Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fined in London, clamped in Southampton! Fine: £460


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4687 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I am desperate for some urgent advice! My brother was fined in October for going into a one way road in London! He never recieved the fine until now!

 

His car was identified in Southampton by one of those CCTV Smart cars and immediately clamped! According to people who clamped his car, he was sent a fine in London as well as door visits and letters, which he received none! There was no home visit either, well at least none that we are aware of!

 

I would like to know what his rights are. He always paid his fines within 14 days period. Now his car is clamped in Southampton, and they given him till Friday to pay £460 fine which also includes charges for home visit and letters sent! If he doesn't pay the fine by Friday, his car will be towed away.

 

Can you guys point me in a direction and guide me on what to do? He doesn't have any money, ge is fine with paying them fine as long as it is proved but how about the charges for home visit and clamping?

 

Many Thanks...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the process for moving traffic violations, but I think they are essentially the same as parking PCNs - which means, the case has remained unpaid and a bailiff warrant has been issued.

 

This can be challenged by filing an out of time statutory declaration/witness statement.

 

You'll have to read around the exact process, unless someone on here can tell you what to do.

 

In any case, you'll need to act fast, and keep all parties completely in the loop as to what you're doing,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just bet a pound to a pinch that when the vehicle was clamped the bailiff concerned was not in possession of the warrant. However, the clamp is now in place. Visit bailiffadviceonline as a matter of urgency for detailed guidance. I am not - for the record - in anyway connected with that site just aware of their knowledge and good standing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your responds guys, i really appreciate it.

 

Green and mean, i dont think it is possible to remove the clamp and would probably get fined for doing so, dont you think?

 

Jamberson and OldSnowy;

 

I checked the bailifadviceonline website and it was advising to fill out Out of Time Statutory Declaration. It also says that bailiff should remove the clamp if its not towed away. After our phone call to the guy who clamped the car, he said he wont remove it!

 

Does that mean that we have to pay the fee and than challenge them afterwards? Or can we demand they remove the clamp?

 

Many Thanks...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your responds guys, i really appreciate it.

 

Green and mean, i dont think it is possible to remove the clamp and would probably get fined for doing so, dont you think?

 

 

Only removing DVLA (untaxed cars) clamps is an offence provided you do not steal the clamp which is why I said return it, its not going to get you into trouble to remove the baliffs clamp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only removing DVLA (untaxed cars) clamps is an offence provided you do not steal the clamp which is why I said return it, its not going to get you into trouble to remove the baliffs clamp.

 

Unless you damage it. However, if you break the lock off and replace it, take it to a police station as 'lost property' you should be ok.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you guys, but the problem is, I dont think i know how to remove a clamp nor know anyone who can do it!

 

Can anyone tell me if the clamper obliged to remove the clamp once he is told that out of statutory declaration is filed? What if you dont have money to pay for the fine to remove the clamp and you need your car?

 

He needs to travel back to London as he finished uni now and he has to move out of his flat by wednesday and he needs his car!

 

Any ideas?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Filing Statutory declaration and sending it to TEC stops all the process that very moment. You should do it asap and inform the bailiff about it. Just read on CAG guidance to filing it as they are very often rejected. Cant even posts a link so you have to search.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your responds guys, i really appreciate it.

 

Green and mean, i dont think it is possible to remove the clamp and would probably get fined for doing so, dont you think?

 

Jamberson and OldSnowy;

 

I checked the bailifadviceonline website and it was advising to fill out Out of Time Statutory Declaration. It also says that bailiff should remove the clamp if its not towed away. After our phone call to the guy who clamped the car, he said he wont remove it!

 

Does that mean that we have to pay the fee and than challenge them afterwards? Or can we demand they remove the clamp?

 

Many Thanks...

 

If you had not received any statutory notices then you can indeed file an Out of Time Statutory Declaration and this is what I advised on my website.

 

BEFORE, submitting the form ring TEC first thing in the morning on 08457 045 007 and provide them with the PCN number and ask them to confirm the PRECISE address of the warrant.

 

Most times, you will need the forms TE7 &TE9 and NOT PE2 & PE3.

 

If you can get the application to TEC by email by around 10.30, then TEC should have time to advised the local authority by around 3-4 pm and in MOST cases the bailiff will return to remove the clamp. All enforcement is then on hold for approx 6 weeks for the LA to consider your application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...