Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A key member of the US central bank, Raphael Bostic, tells the BBC rates might only ease "at the end of 2024".View the full article
    • A key member of the US central bank, Raphael Bostic, tells the BBC rates might only ease "at the end of 2024".View the full article
    • OK, thanks, I won't wait for them. On a side note, some of the posts on here are a bit frustrating, I read through five pages or so of someone going through the court process rooting for them as I'm reading, then nothing, not heard of again. Left here wondering what the outcome was, lol!
    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because there was still £69 owing, I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle. However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account ......... has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4680 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Baililffs from the Sheriffs Office who had not previously gained peaceful entry and had no walking possession forced their way through my back door yesterday. They used considerable force as the bolt was broken off (I've photographed all of the damage) and, as we never use this door, I had stacked a considerable number of books in front of it which were all over the place. I reported the matter to the police last night who said it was a civil matter. I was sure that this sort of action wasn't allowed so am unsure of how to proceed

 

The debt, £613 was from a business we ran which failed (a debt for magazine advertising). I don't deny the debt, but we are unable to pay at the moment but will be able to pay the £600 in around 1 month. The fees from the bailiff are an additional £1340. The bailiffs forced entry at our home address, this company have left a few letters in the past and I have sent letters to them but at no time have I met one of their bailiffs face to face and definatly at no time have I ever let a bailiff into the house.

 

They also entered an outdoor toilet room which has no access to the main body of the house (the childrens bikes are stored in there - its baisically a brick shed attached to the house) would this constitute walking posession

 

They now claim walking possession giving 5 days to respond.

A friend of mine saw the bailiff at our house and said he was wearing body armour - was this for protection or intimidation?

 

Many thanks in advance for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site.

Firstly can you confirm that you are in the UK or Scotland ?

What exactly is the outstanding amount for -is it goods/services or unpaid commercial rent ?

 

When does it relate to-and has there been any action in the Courts ?

Is this a firm of Bailiffs or a High Court Enforcement officer ?

Have you had a breakdown of the £1340 fees ?

And do you agree that the £613 is the correct figure due ?

Would maybe help if you could name the firm involved.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the reply

Yes, we're in the UK (England)

The outstanding sum is for a service (advertising space) for a buisiness we started that soon failed.

I agree that I owe a sum but I need to go through my records to confirm the amount. I did question the amount with the creditor.

A CCJ was obtained, a couple of letters were left at the door by the collection agents and I wrote to them outlining that I was aware of my rights and would not allow entry to the property.

the breakdown is;

Judgment debt - £613

Judgement costs - £60

Execution costs - £50

Intrest - £30

Sheriff's Fees - £1010

VAT - £190

 

the firm is Sheriffs High Court Enforcement Ltd

 

Interestingly I checked the name of the enforcement officer on both the Certified Bailiffs register and the HCEO register and he appears on neather.

 

Missing from the paperwork they left behind was the first sheet of the walking possession details ie that which included the list of good seized, but page 2 with the enforcement officers name, signiature and contact number was.

 

He entered a small sun room, but not through the actual back door of the house.

 

Hope this helps and once again many thanks for your interest in this

Link to post
Share on other sites

This sounds pretty suspect. Do they not need both a signed court warrant AND police attendance to force entry??

 

Not only that, but no walking possession and the sheriffs fee's don't seem right either.

Hope you get some answers on this one........

 

Seems the police are also talking their usual rubbish as well.

If the bailiffs have not followed correct procedure, then this is a criminal matter, as it's breaking and entering.

Edited by hatesdebt
Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for the reply

Yes, we're in the UK (England)

The outstanding sum is for a service (advertising space) for a buisiness we started that soon failed.

I agree that I owe a sum but I need to go through my records to confirm the amount. I did question the amount with the creditor.

A CCJ was obtained, a couple of letters were left at the door by the collection agents and I wrote to them outlining that I was aware of my rights and would not allow entry to the property.

the breakdown is;

Judgment debt - £613

Judgement costs - £60

Execution costs - £50

Intrest - £30

Sheriff's Fees - £1010

VAT - £190

 

the firm is Sheriffs High Court Enforcement Ltd

 

Interestingly I checked the name of the enforcement officer on both the Certified Bailiffs register and the HCEO register and he appears on neather. They do not appear because the attending person is not a Certificated Bailiff nor are they the named HCEO on the Writ. Most nominated HCEOs delegate their work for others to do.

 

Missing from the paperwork they left behind was the first sheet of the walking possession details ie that which included the list of good seized, but page 2 with the enforcement officers name, signiature and contact number was.

 

He entered a small sun room, but not through the actual back door of the house. Was there an unlocked door or window?

 

Hope this helps and once again many thanks for your interest in this

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for thanks for getting in touch

 

"He entered a small sun room, but not through the actual back door of the house. Was there an unlocked door or window? "- All windows were closed and secured but not locked - I've tried and they can't open from the outside, the door had a sliding bolt arrangement, the bolt end had been damaged and the bit the bolt slides into had come away having being forced. I fitted the bolt when I first ran into finantial difficulties and had a visit from the bailiff and have always kept it locked as we very rarely used it, indeed several hundred books were stacked in front of this door and these were scattered all over the floor. I photographed everything, including the damaged bolt and did a video of the room.

 

"Interestingly I checked the name of the enforcement officer on both the Certified Bailiffs register and the HCEO register and he appears on neather. They do not appear because the attending person is not a certificated Bailiff nor are they the named HCEO on the Writ. Most nominated HCEOs delegate their work for others to do." - many thanks for this - it would seem logical that if they are nominated individuals they shouldn't have the same powers, particularly for trying to gain entry (fair enough I suppose if they are just delivering paperwork) do you know of where I can search for the details of the regulation or implications of delecation of powers and who needs to authorise or supervise it?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.hceoa.org.uk/ - look under the Regulatory Information heading.

 

HCEOs must gain peaceful entry to residential premises - same as a Bailiff - but is also allowed to force entry to any detached building within the boundaries - garage, greenhouse, garden shed etc - if he believes it may contain goods to help satisfy the debt. For business premises he is allowed to force entry at any time providing it is not attached to your residential accomodation.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the sunroom is attached to the main body of the house.

The reason I'm interested in the certification part is to have all the info and implications of the action before I approach the police again and/or go down the formal complaint route.

I'm off to court today to submit a form n245 which, from reading about this a bit, would seem to be an immediate course of action, providing a bit of a 'stay of excecution'. As I mentioned in the first post the funds to pay all of our debts will be available in around a month. I intend to pay the creditor directly and not through the bailiff as I'm fairly certain that I am entitled to do this.

Thanks one again for all your input on this

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can upload it in a zip or pdf.

 

How to upload a PDF or ZIP file:

 

Scan the required letters/agreements/sheets as a jpeg picture file.

 

Remove all personal info inc barcodes etc using paint but leave all figures and dates.

 

Use one of the many free online pdf converter websites to convert the image to PDF format or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that, open a new msg box on your thread;

 

click 'go advanced' below the msg box

click 'manage attachments' below that box

click the 'add files' button on the top right

click 'select files',

 

Navigate to your file on your pc

 

click 'upload files'

 

You can set where it goes in the post by hitting 'insert inline'.

 

click the 'reply' button.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm off to court today to submit a form n245 which, from reading about this a bit, would seem to be an immediate course of action, providing a bit of a 'stay of excecution'.

 

A Stay of Execution is applied for on Form N244

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The following are the photo's of the point of entry

 

IMG00198-20110620-1932.jpg

IMG00205-20110621-0642.jpg

IMG00201-20110621-0640.jpg

IMG00198-20110620-1932.jpg

 

Four different views - one of the bolt, one looking towards the door (it's only a half size door - morelike an access hatch!), one looking away from the position of the door showing the scattering of the books and one looking from above at the door. Bear in mind that this room is regularly used to access the washing machine, and when we tried to get into it after the HCEO visit we couldn't open our back door to get into the washing machine room without much pushing to get past the displaced books.

IMG00207-20110621-0642.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's some help for your N244

 

N244 Form:

 

Name of Court - where CCJ was awarded

Claim No - CCJ number

Warrant No - leave blank

Claimants Name - name of Claimant as entered on CCJ

Defendants Name - name of Defendant as entered on CCJ

Date - when you filled this in

Q1 - put your name in here

Q2 - tick relevant box

Q3 - a brief description - you are applying for Set Aside because you never knew you had a CCJ until a High Court Enforcement Officer arrived. If applicable ask for case to be transferred to local Court. If necessary also ask for Stay of Execution

Q4 - tick No

Q5 - tick at a hearing

Q6 - leave blank

Q7 - leave blank unless relevant

Q8 - District Judge

Q9 - Claimant & Defendant

Q10 - needs expansion of Q3 - better done on sheet(s) of paper with each point bulletted. Remember to copy of Statement of Truth on to last sheet & sign + date. Tick statement of case on form and again sign + date

Q11 - fill your details in

 

Send form to Court where CCJ was awarded with appropriate fee.

 

Claimant is entitled to oppose your application but in most cases this can be disregarded.

 

The only other thing to bear in mind here is that the Stay is the most important application to make. In many cases it is easier to take the forms to Court personally & preferably on a morning. Explain the urgency of the Stay application and usually a "spare" Judge can be found who will be able to hear your Stay application immediately. If successfull you must then inform the HCEO company ASAP giving Court name, Judge & date. When the paperwork comes through you should then send them a copy ASAP. In my view you are better informing all parties yourself rather than relying on others.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for all of that advice, very much appreciated.

I've printed off the N244 and I'm gathering together all documentation that I can find which may have a bearing on the case ready to take to the court, which will now have to be first thing in the morning when I can arrange childcare and transport.

As well as details of this warrent and debt, I can include evidence of imminent availabilty of funds (waiting for completion on our house which has now sold with a little equity - hugh sigh of relief etc etc!)

Do you think that I should take along a copy of the photo's that I have posted here or will that have no bearing on the case?

Do I need to include additional personal facts eg partner currently 6 months pregnant & naturally very distressed.

All of your advice has been really valuable, thank's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

re post 17

"Q3 - a brief description - you are applying for Set Aside because you never knew you had a CCJ until a High Court Enforcement Officer arrived. If applicable ask for case to be transferred to local Court. If necessary also ask for Stay of Execution"

I knew there was a CCJ and acknowledged the debt in writing, but have been unable to pay any of it through really pressing hardship over the last year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

re post 17

"Q3 - a brief description - you are applying for Set Aside because you never knew you had a CCJ until a High Court Enforcement Officer arrived. If applicable ask for case to be transferred to local Court. If necessary also ask for Stay of Execution"

I knew there was a CCJ and acknowledged the debt in writing, but have been unable to pay any of it through really pressing hardship over the last year.

 

OK scrap that bit, and just apply for the Stay but you do need grounds for this. Most usually because you cannot afford the fees charged or pending determination of another application. The only other application you can probably make would be for a Variation Order where you can ask to pay in instalments - this is done on Form N245 and you have to submit I & E but is generally a simple process. However you have to remember you will have 2 Court fees to pay unless you are on a low wage or certain Benefits in which case you will need Form EX160 for Fee Remission.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this has been moved up from County Court to High Court for enforcement is there not a different procedure for asking for the warrant to be suspended. Might be worth ringing the court and asking.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this has been moved up from County Court to High Court for enforcement is there not a different procedure for asking for the warrant to be suspended. Might be worth ringing the court and asking.

 

Only Enforcement has been moved up to the High Court any applications and/or other queries are still dealt with in the County Court so Form N244 still applies.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for raising the point Ell-enn, and for answering ot Ploddertom. I've just checked and confirmed that this is correct. I think I'll take both n244 and n245 along ready filled in tomorrow so both avenues are covered and either one submitted.

Am I correct in my belief that once one of the above forms has been submitted that pending bailiff action must be put on hold.?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you use the N245 (application to suspend warrant) it will cost £40 - this will suspend bailiff action until the judge has looked at your application and made a decision - if you send appropriate proof that you will have the funds to clear the debt then you shouldn't have any trouble in getting the warrant suspended. l if you use the N244 (application for a hearing) it will be £80 and you will have to attend a hearing.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you use the N245 (application to suspend warrant) it will cost £40 - this will suspend bailiff action until the judge has looked at your application and made a decision - if you send appropriate proof that you will have the funds to clear the debt then you shouldn't have any trouble in getting the warrant suspended. l if you use the N244 (application for a hearing) it will be £80 and you will have to attend a hearing.

 

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news but the N245 only suspends a Warrant of Execution - that issued to the Court Bailiff, for HCEO you need a Stay of Execution and that is done on N244.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...