Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

£1500 stolen from checked baggage: Small Claims?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4691 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

I flew Turkish airlines and on my return my bag was not on the carousel. I reported it missing and collected the PIR form. The next day I received the suitcase and the padlock had been ripped off (including the handles) and around £1500 worth of personal items (included a couple of electronic items) had been stolen from my luggage.

 

I submitted a written claim to Turkish Airlines for the damaged bag and included receipts for the missing items.

 

Turkish airlines sent a letter back stating that they would offer me $405 (equivalent to around £250) with the following statements:

 

1) The airline's liability is limited by the Montreal Convention.

2) Valuable items including valuable electric equipment (underlined by them) should not be included in the checked baggage.

3) If the carrier offers an excess valuation facility, a declaration can be made prior to the flight and applicable charges can be paid. As this was not done in my case, my missing electrical items will not be taken into consideration.

4) If I accept the offer, I have to sign a release saying no further action will be taken and that I cannot claim from my own insurance.

 

I've read a couple of online articles that says the Montreal convention does not make any distinctions for valuable items - "Airlines may try to say that they are not liable for valuable items. But, the legislation makes no exceptions, therefore they are liable for items such as cameras," bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/moneybox/3862749.stm

 

Also this website states that if my claim is not met, then I should consider the Small Claims Court: thetravelinsider.com/travelaccessories/lostbaggagerights.htm and that my chances of winning if I have receipts and the claim is not huge.

 

Turkish Airlines own website states the maximum they will pay according to the Montreal Convention is 1,131 Special Drawing Rights, approximately £1,101 turkishairlines.com/en-INT/services/passenger_services/pursuant.aspx

 

Is my claim for the full amount £1,101 valid and can anyone suggest the best way to write back to them and try to persuade them to pay out the maximum amount?

 

If not, could anyone tell me the best way to go about a Small Claims Court action? Can I have any input on the the venue and the timings? Are there any draft Letter Before Action letters I could read?

 

Thanks everyone

 

(PS, anyone posting that I should not have placed electrical items in checked baggage will be ignored. Kicked myself enough over this.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. You may have answered your own question about the electrical items, but others here know more than I do. In case it helps, did the flight leave from the UK?

 

Were you insured for this trip please?

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe an obvious question but did you have travel insurance? If not then your household contents insurance usually covers you for items removed from the house temporarily. Also certain credit cards give you free travel insurance.

If none of the above applies then one of the other more knowledgeable CAGGERS will be along shortly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes I do have travel insurance through HSBC Premier but have not tried to claim through them yet as I thought I would inform the Manchester Airport police first and get a crime reference number and then to get Turkish Airlines Manchester office to begin an investigation.

 

My letters have been to the Manchester office of Turkish Airlines and their General Manager responded with the £250 offer. I am pretty sure that this is a deliberately low offer to try and get rid of me so will write to them again, but wanted some advice off here first about my rights and how to draft a Letter Before Action (and whether I can go the Small Claims Court or MoneyClaim Online route?)

 

If they pay me the full amount according to the Montreal Convention (£1100) then I may write the rest off to experience.

 

The inbound flight was from Jeddah-Istanbul-Manchester and upon arrival at Manchester the bag was missing. Outbound was the reverse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have insurance then why are you wasting your time with the airline. You have a crime number from the police so claim on your insurance and then claim off the airline for any excess the insurance policy has.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Instead of setting up the airline as an adversary, I would concentrate on solving the crime. There should then be a common purpose.

 

What do the police have to say? There should not have been an enormous number of individuals with access to the luggage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...