Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1 Date of the infringement 31 March 2024   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 8 April 2024   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 15 April 2024   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Y   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Y   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Y   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Y   7 Who is the parking company? Horizon   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Iceland Chester   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Horizon parking Horizon Iceland Chester.pdf
    • Part of a settlement agreement.   concerbs over her nane online we’re raised and I was blamed for bad mouthing. I explained I put nothing up myself.  cannot discuss details of the case as per agreement.  
    • The sticky thread is locked because it's just a template thread. We need to see the invoice you're disputing. And for you to answer the questions below (I'm guessing this is an ANPR capture, the vast majority of tickets are) -   For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident)   Please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement Give answer here   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Give answer here   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received Give answer here   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Give answer here   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Give answer here   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here   7 Who is the parking company? Give answer here   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Give answer here   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Give answer here   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions... …….... In either case scan up both sides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY
    • Perfect, thanks Dave.   You're right, a whole dodo storm this has been. As sons of first-generation immigrant parents, whenever something like this happens the old man panics. There was a whole "appeal this now" because my dad paid for the parking as he was with the hirer at the time and he isn't as tech-savvy as my brother so he ended up doing what he did and because I don't live there anymore it came all the way down to this.  But yes, we'll do this SAR and see what comes of it.  Will keep posting here with the hopes that it may benefit someone in the future.  Thanks again, everyone. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ingeus


Raven1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2451 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi lemonnews,

 

Feel free to put in a complaint, by rights there is rigorous complaints process but it is rarely followed. What should happen is that your complaint should be followed up by a Lead Advisor or PDM.

 

Though it should not be overlooked - Ingeus are going through difficult times at the moment. Only 2 weeks ago a huge restructure had been announced - with many redundancies highlighted. Though it concerns non-essential staff (mainly Admin, GFs and PDMs) staff are running round like headless chickens at the moment.

 

Good luck though! Poor service should never be ignored.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Though it should not be overlooked - Ingeus are going through difficult times at the moment. Only 2 weeks ago a huge restructure had been announced - with many redundancies highlighted. Though it concerns non-essential staff (mainly Admin, GFs and PDMs) staff are running round like headless chickens at the moment.

 

Interesting, I wonder if the restructuring is down to squeezing out the last bit of profit there is to be had in anticipation of the contract not being renewed when it ends as far as I know sometime next year, probably wishful thinking but savings have to been gained from somewhere and by all accounts the scheme is not very cost effective at the moment for either party.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats the best way to complain about an Ingeus adviser and your bad experiences in general with the company i general?.

 

starting a job next Monday so finally free and to boot its a job i found myself!.

 

i`m signing on for the last time on Friday so shall i have a word with the adviser i see?.

 

You should have been informed of their internal complaints procedure when you first started. If you were not given the documentation (or have binned it), there is nothing to stop you from asking for it again. For an overview, there is the DWP issued guidance on the subject: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/394690/wp-pg-chapter-16.pdf

 

In your shoes, I would say nothing to either Ingeus or the JCP about your new job. When you come to sign off, just state "personal reasons" if asked. However, be prepared for harassment from Ingeus in their attempts to elicit employer details. Feel free to express yourself in what ever manner you deem appropriate when they call :madgrin:

 

Ingeus are going through difficult times at the moment. Only 2 weeks ago a huge restructure had been announced - with many redundancies highlighted.

 

An ideal opportunity to give them some advice on job hunting and living on £73.10 per week.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that's true, the Work Programme did get a 1 year extension and is due to currently end in early 2017, though there have been rumours from management that very soon it could be extended further.

 

But the facts can't be ignored. Last year in England referrals to Ingeus averaged at approx 10000 per month. So far this year it's around 3000. Advisors are experiencing falling caseloads from around 100-150 to numbers more like 40-50.

 

There are extreme costcutting measures being installed and my concern is the poor service some of you are already receiving will get worse. Clients are being assessed in payment groups on a more regular basis, as opposed to identifying true and accurate support.

 

Management feel Ingeus will have to shift focus away from JSA claimants as there are not enough of them currently. There has been a significant increase in ESA claimants but the numbers JCP are talking about have yet to be referred to WP.

 

The next few months will be very interesting as this is round 1 of redundancies and we can expect more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When a business only has a single source of revenue, it is in a vulnerable position. When this source of revenue is dictated by government policy, the business model is subject to the whims of who ever is in power. Now that front line staff are being pressured by management to improve profitability, the clients have to be more proactive in their dealings. My recommendations (as always) are:

 

  • Record ALL conversations & meetings.
  • Challenge every provision, target, or mandated task.
  • Get everything in writing, including all meeting reports.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I cannot see this business model being sustainable for much longer, as stated, the number of referrals have dramatically dropped and they are not paid any more for referrals, so in my opinion the numbers game does not work for them any more, they actually have to spend resources and now will only get paid through earned results.

 

There is a phrase called "parking" where they basically go through the motions with the customer but not provide any real support, concentrating time and effort only on those customers they feel are more able to find work quickly, I think the number of "parked" customers will rise as both the job market and unemployment rate have plateaued which would indicate in my opinion that any scheme would not be cost effective at present unless they reinstate the referral fee.

 

But considering the cuts would the government reinstate the referral fee, could Ingeus survive without it ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I cannot see this business model being sustainable for much longer, as stated, the number of referrals have dramatically dropped and they are not paid any more for referrals, so in my opinion the numbers game does not work for them any more, they actually have to spend resources and now will only get paid through earned results.

 

There is a phrase called "parking" where they basically go through the motions with the customer but not provide any real support, concentrating time and effort only on those customers they feel are more able to find work quickly, I think the number of "parked" customers will rise as both the job market and unemployment rate have plateaued which would indicate in my opinion that any scheme would not be cost effective at present unless they reinstate the referral fee.

 

But considering the cuts would the government reinstate the referral fee, could Ingeus survive without it ?

The Business Model was never sustainable from the outset...in the case of Deloitte-Ingeus (Deloitte entered a joint venture with Ingeus in October 2010 to bid for the Work Programme Contacts {announced December 2010 by the DWP]), bid 70% less than any other party and ended up with 23% of the Prime Contracts), they presumed that all candidates would access employment from the outset and/or become Self Employed vendors for the Acme Corporation (or similar - such as eBay Sellers)) and need not put any effort into the job selection process, and even the Deloitte-Ingeus Employer Services Teams failed to generate any interviews for candidates. In the recent year or so, Deloitte divested itself from the joint venture, and Ingeus sold its stake to a US Private Equity Business Provident Service Corporation (reported on April 1st 2014).

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2c771c22-b9a7-11e3-b74f-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3cfu90KbR

 

 

The term "Parking" can be quite erroneous...the term simply means that Welfare To Work Clerks within Deloitte-Ingeus did not possess a basic level of competence to speak to employers on behalf of candidates. If the candidate in question, whose sole responsibility was to the Job Seekers Agreement and to Job Centre Plus, did not sign the Data Protection Waiver, then there was little incentive for Welfare To Work Clerks within Deloitte-Ingeus to put any effort in.

 

Given that the DWP own research suggested that the Work Programme was less effective than doing nothing, it is not surprising that the Business Model was a flawed extension of the belief system of George Iain Duncan Smith.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The term "Parking" is even more erroneous in the context of the Welfare To Work Sector, irrespective of whether through the Flexible New Deal or successor Work Programme.

The payment-by-results model means 'job-ready' jobseekers are being helped more than those in need, costing more long term

The DWP reported through its own research findings that the Work Programme was less effective than doing nothing,

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/spending-review/10146659/5bn-Work-Programme-worse-than-doing-nothing.html

 

The scheme was never designed to provide any "help" to any unemployed person, but did help the self-serving Welfare To Work Sector, including the likes of A4E, to grow extremely rich at the expense of the taxpayer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The scheme was never designed to provide any "help" to any unemployed person, but did help the self-serving Welfare To Work Sector, including the likes of A4E, to grow extremely rich at the expense of the taxpayer.

 

The tax payer are voyeurs to the sadistic practices reaped upon the less fortunate , I think they getting their moneys worth

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a taxpayer, I object to my taxes being used to inflict misery and suffering on the poor and/or vulnerable. Those in power who are responsible should be held to account and made to suffer in equal measure.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers for the reply tfp,

 

funnily enough my issues are also with a female adviser at Leeds branch of Ingeus.

 

it sounds like we have had similar experience, this women was rude, looked down on you like you were worthless and constant texts about crap jobs. also dismissed any talk of self employment.

 

form beginning to end from letters she didnt send for appointments and trying to insinuate i was lying to putting me forward for jobs which were not even in my options. too many workshops and didnt give a toss about your own job searching and records for the job centre. also she woulnt give me a copy of my ingeus contract which i first signed last year. not even a blank copy of the contract...i just wanted one to know what was expected of me as i`m sure you feel that your very much in the dark at times.

 

it was very hard not to be rude but i always kept my cool. i`m going to go in tomorrow and see her line manager, at least she might get a talking to but how she works with the public on a daily basis with her people skills and demeanour. if its the same women then that will be at least 2 complaints against her.

 

all the best.

 

If anyone is going to the candidate pool preperation workshop anytime soon your in for a treat ha!...still had to attend even though i wont be going into it.

Meeting with her line manager on Friday.

still had to go to all these workshops (green light thinking), (skills assessment) even though i`m starting work in the near future and no there no getting any details.

Is it just me or is Ingeus just a waste of time?/money?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it just me or is Ingeus just a waste of time?/money?.

 

No, it is not just you, nor is it limited to Ingeus.

 

The whole Work Programme is a waste of time and money. Whilst a very small minority of claimants might derive some benefit from this scheme, the majority are there for no other reason than to harass.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it is not just you, nor is it limited to Ingeus.

 

The whole Work Programme is a waste of time and money. Whilst a very small minority of claimants might derive some benefit from this scheme, the majority are there for no other reason than to harass.

 

 

Worse than a waste of money, the entire W2W sector is riddled with corruption. it has gone beyond being unfit for purpose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just curious, does everyone else on here receive text message reminders of their upcoming Ingeus appointments?

 

Anyone else find these annoying, or is it just me? They are usually delivered the night before, as late as 10:30 in the evening. They also contain no method by which you can opt out of receiving such messages.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just curious, does everyone else on here receive text message reminders of their upcoming Ingeus appointments?

[...]

They also contain no method by which you can opt out of receiving such messages.

 

I have never had text messages or emails to remind me of any appointments. But then I don't have a suitable phone, and when asked, always refused to divulge an email address.

 

In your situation, I think it best to write a suitably worded letter to Ingeus insisting that they remove your number from their system. Do not take no for an answer, and if they refuse, ask for a copy of their complaints procedure.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have never had text messages or emails to remind me of any appointments. But then I don't have a suitable phone, and when asked, always refused to divulge an email address.

 

In your situation, I think it best to write a suitably worded letter to Ingeus insisting that they remove your number from their system. Do not take no for an answer, and if they refuse, ask for a copy of their complaints procedure.

 

Yeah, will probably do as you say...never explicitly gave them my phone number, but suspect it was passed on in the initial transfer of data from the DWP. My own fault for letting the DWP have my number!

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the dangers of giving the DWP personal information: Due to the way these Work Programme contracts are worded, the DWP is the 'data controller'. So any information you provide them may be shared with any third party without your express consent.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the dangers of giving the DWP personal information: Due to the way these Work Programme contracts are worded, the DWP is the 'data controller'. So any information you provide them may be shared with any third party without your express consent.

So, the best way to get my number removed from Ingeus'/DWP records altogether (not just the Ingeus SMS reminder system) hmmm..

 

I'm pretty sure requesting that they remove my number altogether will raise some eyebrows, so will probably just inform them I've changed my number (my guess is they will still keep my old one on record though!)

 

I now use a service called disguisemynumber.co.uk whenever I want/need to hand out a number to people I feel may misuse it. It let's you generate a personal number (which you can delete or change at any time) which is forwarded to your real number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could always tell them your mobile is broken and no longer working and as you are on benefits you do not have the money to replace it.They took my mobile number off their system after i told them that.I got fed up with the constant phonecalls especially when they phoned me 5 times in about half an hour just to tell me about a job they wanted to put me forward for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Been reading this for a while and left ingeus a few months ago, I withdrawn consent about a month ago which I sent a letter to ingeus manager but no reply, I handed one in the job centre myself and the guy on the front desk opened the letter then took it to a manager who was nice and said she will sort it out no worries, the guy behind the desk was clueless at first then said 'oh...them? '(Ingeus) then he said ' everyone's complaining about them'. I mentioned my signature forged twice (I'm pretty sure) by the same grouchy advisor. Ingeus isn't help its a punishment sugar coated by deluded ********

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Started a college course not too long ago but these clowns are still convinced I've to met with them etc even though I have signed off JSA and therefore not part of the "work programme"

 

 

Is there anyway in which they can be politely told to eff off so I don't get any silly appointments or letters from them ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Started a college course not too long ago but these clowns are still convinced I've to met with them etc even though I have signed off JSA and therefore not part of the "work programme"

 

 

Is there anyway in which they can be politely told to eff off so I don't get any silly appointments or letters from them ?

 

Why be polite? Just tell them you are no longer on benefits so they have no reason to keep contacting you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...