Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ingeus


Raven1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

yep its a wonderful corrupt system that has been created..where only the fittest survive....darwinism in action....the rich at the top of the heap doing exactly what they want..whilst the rest of us scramble around for the crumbs.....labour arent going to save us...they are simply conservatives in sheeps clothing and osdset is exactly as usual spot on...it was them that started this welfare reform....the tory's have just carried it on...we still would have had a similar situation if brown had managed to win.....so where do we go? I'm lucky fast heading towards 60 so I am not going to be around to see the future...but by god it looks bleak for my kids and grandkids....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Lets not forget that Labour instigated the Remploy Closure Programme in 2008 .... the justification for closing then as now is that the subsidy per job through Remploy (£25,000) is considerably greater than the subsidy per job through the then Flexible New Deal and Work Programme.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets also not forget that the taxpayer subsidy for the Commons catering service rose to £5.8 million last year, for every £10 an MP spent on food and drink, the taxpayer added a top-up of £7.60.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets also not forget that the taxpayer subsidy for the Commons catering service rose to £5.8 million last year, for every £10 an MP spent on food and drink, the taxpayer added a top-up of £7.60.

ah yes....but you have to remember these people need this service and more..they work incredibly hard for their constituents and country...excuse me whilst i choke....

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have them working in our office, they have to get a full check etc, then do jobs such as analysing the staff survey, organising the lean boards etc.

Its not good, they have no chance of a job at the end of it, and look bored to tears most of the time or walk around in a huddle.

They have no access to any systems.

They seem young, very young and its very sad...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sat there watching the jubilee celebrations and our Queen. It was good, but i couldn't get out of my mind those poor kids out in the cold with only a plastic poncho, t shirt and combat trousers. That could have been my grandson as he has been out of work and comes from one of the areas the slaves.. whoops, volunteers came from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

puts me in mind of my dear old Mum. She wrote to various governments and MPs demanding to kno0w when her "Post War Credits" would be paid.

They were eventually though, of course, in much devalued currency.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reminds me of my dear old Mum.

Had a bee in her bonnet abouit post war credits and wrote to many MPs demanding that they keep their promise to refund these voluntary loans soon after WW2.

Eventually they were repaid but in much devalued 60s currency.

never trust a politician eh?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It brilliant that one of the pimp Companys have been caught with their trousers down - sorry no pun meant in this case - intended as the old fashioned comment - It at last has been brought into the open only one of the many types of abuse these Providers are using, anyone official that believes that it was - Only an accident Sir - should take off their official blinkers. :mad2:

 

This Company should have their Licence to provide Security at the Olympics withdrawn - perhaps this would give the Big Frequent Offenders a boot up the rear to clean up their activities. Well we can but hope. Perhaps hell will freeze over before the "Investigation" even gets under way. :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting to note that all the job seekers were coached in from Bristol, Bath, and Portsmouth, none were from London. These people were offered the carrot of a job Stewarding at the Olympics which is being held in London, was the 'camping' experience a lead up to what they could expect if getting a place? Camping out for the duration of the placement?

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That did cross my mind osdset that none were Locals - are Tomorrows People only Coastal or do they cover Home Counties and Outer London. If they cover more Local Areas why bus people so far.

 

Late on Wed night on TV the Tomorrows People Boss said the People had been booked into a Camp Site with Facilities etc. if that was the case why were they dumped under a Bridge and I remember one of the people said they could'nt put tents on concrete - so that possibly WAS the Camp Site - Someone is lying - It doesn't take many guesses who ! :evil:

 

When I looked at the Link that showed the Company Finances it looked to me that they would be very lucky to last untill the Olympics - Perhaps that is why they are bringing in people from distances in order to collect a Handout for giving them work and then the people wont be able to claim the Job Start for another 6 months because there has been a break in their JSA - more money saved for DWP

 

I would love to know with a FOI Question "How many Jobs are waiting for these people and the Olympics Stewards local to where they live? "

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that there was at least one camp site situated in a park in West Ham, which is about a mile from Stratford in East London.

 

Stratford is part of Newham which is one of the poorest boroughs in London, there are currently nine job seekers for every vacancy almost twice the national average.

 

Newham has more than enough of it's own unemployed available to fill any vacancy at the Olympic games many times over, I would like to know why priority is not being given to local job seekers, this is a double blow to the area as when the Olympic site was under construction most of the workforce were imported from virtually every area except Newham.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The (excellent) Huffington Post has an article here: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/06/05/kerry-mccarthy-mp-jubilee-workfare-unemployed_n_1570067.html?ref=mostpopular

and an open letter to Ed Milliband from backbench MPEoin Clarke:

http://eoin-clarke.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/open-letter-to-ed-miliband.html?spref=tw

 

I can't help thinking how ironic it would be if the bastion of right wing toryism (the monarchy) was inadvertently responsible for the destruction of the Tory's flagship policy. Long way to go yet though. "Eating Elepahants is easy - one bite at a time" is one of the many silly, supposedly motivational slogans stuck to the wall of my local A4e prison - may be true in this case. Keep chipping away.

Edited by Bakatcha
spelling stupid!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm! Just noticed that this page has a pop up advert for A4e's/Enemma Harrison's "Money Advice" company. Bit dubious that.

 

I wonder if they can advise how to acquire for personal use £8.6 million of taxpayer's dosh?

Edited by Bakatcha
Didn't like "scam"
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I would love to know with a FOI Question "How many Jobs are waiting for these people and the Olympics Stewards local to where they live? "

if this was a 'genuine' opportunity then i also wonder how many who had to undergo this degrading spectacle were offered permanent employment with this wonderful company......my guess ZERO.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

On your JSA agreement, (JSAg) it tells you how far you're expected to travel to look for work. Depending on how many weeks you've been claiming for, this can be 60 or 90 minutes. So, how could they get away with sending people 4 hours away?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't trust 'Close Protection UK' to guard a bag of spuds after reading that. Rather a grand company name for such a seemingly poor looking outfit. Dumping bus loads of unemployed people under a bridge and asking them to pitch tents on concrete, making them freeze because the bus driver was 2 hours early (why not wait on the bus for 2 hours!), giving them nowhere to change etc etc Does not give the impression of an elite organisation.

 

I wonder if Close Protection UK are going to be responsible for guarding any of the surface to air missile sites that will be scattered around London during the Olympics.

 

Well I guess it beats paying for security!

 

WELL DONE W2W!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...