Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

First Trust Bank (AIB) ruining my credit record


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4688 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Sorry guys if this is the wrong place for this.

 

Basically - longwinded story but the short version is i have i loan with First Trust which they are repeatedly reporting to credit reference agencies is in arrears (every month), despite the fact i haven't missed a payment and they acknowledge this! They refuse to stop doing this until the loan is settled, which is 9k, and this will mean years of crap credit despite always paying.

 

Understandably its ruining my plans and is deeply unfair but the longwinded version might help someone give me some advice.

 

I moved from Northern Ireland to Liverpool due to business. At the time i had two small personal loans with First Trust (Northern Ireland branch of Allied Irish Bank i think). I also had a current account which previous wages went into and then serviced the loans.

 

When i moved i found it impossible to deal with First Trust. No local branches, so couldn;t get stuff done face to face etc. They refused to change my address and wouldn't accept COA by post. I wasn't going to fly over to Belfast just to change a bank account, so this saga went on. Numerous letters were sent but they always denied receiving them or told me i'd be best coming in to a branch (Arrgh!).

 

I started using Halifax for personal accounts so income never went to First Trust. This created the problem of servicing the loans. I had to post Standing Order multiple times but they denied receiving them. I fell in arrears because i thought they had it sorted, and what with going abroad, it got screwed up. When i knew, i settled by phone and complained. Eventually i got contacted by some credit control guy and after much arguing it turned out that they were sending letters to my prior address (since they refused to change it despite lots of letters) - and had decided to convert the two perosnal loans into a consolidation loan, and set that up with my new Halifax account. He ASSURED me that there would be no effect on my credit and he would ensure that past missed payments would not impact my credit report.

 

All good so far. Fast forward a year and i apply for credit. They knock me back because i am in arrears. I never had a record of the guy i sorted things with. I write twice to complain, eventually get short reply saying that i am considered in default due to missed payments on the PREVIOUS loans, but they acknowledged i was up to date with the consolidation loans. I ring to clarify this, and they are adamant that they are within their rights to keep reporting that i am in arrears, every month, "until i settle the loan" . That would be 4 years at the current rate. In the meantime lots of things i am trying to do, including in my business life, are being affected by this.

 

Now bear in mind i am asking them - what do i need to pay for previous missed payments in the other loans, were they not settled by the consolidation??? no i am up to date, but if i have a problem i should settle the loan...

 

I tried to read on this site for advice, and in the end hit them with a complaint letter and a SAR. In the SAR request i made it quite clear i wanted copies of correspondence, call logs, notes made on the system etc. They sent me two letters. One from some muppet saying they were investigating my complaint (6 weeks on no news), and a big pile of statements in response to the SAR. Statements only nothing else.

 

All i wantfrom them is:

 

  1. stop reporting me being in arrears when i am paying you every month and you tell me i owe nothing!
  2. contact experian and get them to remove the 12mths worth of unfair and incorrect default notices
  3. let me pay the balance of the loan in peace without ruining my credit (and my business plans)

 

What should i do next? i am exasperated with them and feeling a bit powerless as to my next step. I hope someone has had the patience to bear with me and read this, and has some guidance for me!

 

Thanks for listening!

 

Yours

Frustrated Ulsterman:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

All i wantfrom them is: 1. stop reporting me being in arrears when i am paying you every month and you tell me i owe nothing! 2. contact experian and get them to remove the 12mths worth of unfair and incorrect default notices 3. let me pay the balance of the loan in peace without ruining my credit Ask them nicely. If they don't comply, a quicker way to get them to reconsider might be a small claim for damaged credit reputation. Good luck.

Edited by Durkin
Spacing
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you cerberusalert and durkin

 

Do i have a right to ask for decision makers email addresses? its just that they repeatedly deny receiving my letters and at least with an email and a recoreded delivery letter, i might have more proof.

 

I think i might send them one more letter/email, and if no luck, complain to the ICO. I have no idea about making a legal claim against a bank for damaged credit reputation. I never heard of that. Surely it is very costly and a bank would just delay it and delay it? But i'll search on here to see what thats about.

 

Should i also complain to the ICO they only sent me statement copies? do i not have a right to all the other communications (copies of calls logs, internal messages, letters to me, etc)? if i did it might help me prove my point. Statements don't really help as they don't tell the full story.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Do i have a right to ask for decision makers email addresses?.

 

 

Unsure if you have a right but it seems reasonable to ask.

I have no idea about making a legal claim against a bank for damaged credit reputation. I never heard of that. Surely it is very costly and a bank would just delay it and delay it? But i'll search on here to see what thats about?.

The court will help you with a small claim. You can claim £5K in the small claims court for damage to credit reputation. Once the maximum limit rises to £15K folk can claim an easy £8K.

 

The court may actually be quicker than the ICO. My experience is that the ICO are a waste of time and space.

 

Legal action should make them think. My case has snowballed into a £500K action being helped through to the UK Suoreme Court through charity.They'll probably not want a similar action to develop.

 

For less than £40 it could be worth a try. You can quote Kpohraror v woolwich 1996 and to a certain extent my case: Durkin v DSG & HFC

 

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...