Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

inherited debts from deceased with only estate my home!!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4703 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have a complex situation....

 

My Mum died In 2008 (when I was 21yo) she left a huge amount of debt and a small completely run down house.

 

As he next of kin I got probate, i contacted all known creditors and most when i explained i lived in the house wrote off the debt - great....

 

Except RBS who had been chasing me for her £3500 credit card debt...

 

By the time my mum was cremated I owed 10k for funerals administration costs and a loan which I took out to make the house habitable... (at 21)

 

I'm now being told The estate I.E my home (becuase there was not anyhting else) still owe's this money and RBS demand payment.

 

I have been told I have 3 options ....

 

Pay the full amount in a lump sum.... Immpossible

Sign a payment plan for an agreed amount untill it's paid off....

of they will put a charging order on the house ... which I understand means when the house is sold RBS get their peice of the pie.... Great I am planning to live here for the rest of my life so take what you want when I'm dead....however I dont claim to understand the full scale of a charging order and what that means (any further info would be greatly appreciated)

 

I want to know .. can they add interest to a charging order - or do they just get 3500 whenever I sell it.. or does this add extra costs of any kind ?

 

Obviously RBS are trying to convince me that it's best to offer to pay the debt through a monthy agreement , but I can't help but feel that some "advisor " at RBS is up for a big bonus if they can convince me to pay a debt they have been chasing for 10 years - even though legally I may not have to pay any thing, by agreeing to something the debt does become mine because I have entered the agreement.

 

Does any one have any suggestions how to sort this mess out?

 

I'm more than happy to pay them when the house is sold ... athough I don't plan to sell it for like 30 years - so just don't want to find interest has turned 3500 in to 35,000 .....

 

( also there is an option to make them and offer of what i'm willing to pay - any ideas what the least amount they are likely to accept would be ? baring in mind they have not had a payment on it since 2001)..

 

Can I just tell them to keep on chasing I aint paying ? and what else can they do to try to force payment ....?

 

surely no judge will allow a forced sale for 3500? I WOULD BE HOMELESS!

 

They have given my 2 weeks to seek advice before they expect my responce PLEASE HELP!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying there has been no payment on this debt for 10 years ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, who exactly is asking for this and how... ? Has this gone legal at all at the moment? Have they put these threats in writing or just by telephone.

 

I'm no expert but if that was your mums estate and she owed the money then yes I believe the estate still owes the debt although in the circumstances you'd expect them to write off such a small value debt.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did a solicitor adminster the probate or did you do everything yourself to wind the estate up ? Have RBS proved the debt statements payments etc ? and did they make a claim, also did you put a notice in the local paper and london Gazette inviting creditors to contact the estate if they had a claim.

 

If they cannot prove the debt the estate owes them nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ell-en - as far as I know no, there has been no payments since 2001 when mum took out the card in the first place .... until she died in 2008. I was under the impression they accepted the death certificate and wrote off the debt... they have been sending post to the wrong address trying to chase me i've therefore i've obly just realised they had been chasing it!

 

The shadow - I've spoken to RBS , no legal stuff has happened yet , They had wrote to me but My Dad got the post at his house and we have not been in touch for years .... They have discussed my "options over the phone " but I've not seen the letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I am surprised that RBS are putting you through tis stress.It was your Mums debt I don't believe that there is alot they can enforce.

Just to put your mind at rest. IMO I am convinced that you have no chance whatsoever of any forced sale of your property.There attitude is appalling, if it was me I ignore them.

All the best

Cad

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a Statute Barred debt and they cannot take any enforcement, send them this; http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?408-Letter-sent-when-debt-is-statute-barred

 

The onus is on them to prove it is not statute barred & the only way they can do that is by showing that a payment has been made within a six year period or a written admission of the debt has been made by your mother.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rondodriver - I did the probate my self I couldnt afford a solicitor, I sifted through all the documents I could find and contacted all the companies myself to tell them the situation... they all said send the documents including RBS and suggested they would not need to contact me any further .... I was 21 nieve and skint (still am) I had to take out loans to pay for the funeral ..... and neadless to say I had 2 weeks to sort this lot out after my Mum died before I had to return to work!

Link to post
Share on other sites

cerberusalert - Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, we suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to CPUTR2008

 

We await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

"Is this the case if they have been senting letters demanding payment throughout the period ? I know nothing has been paid on it in at least 6 years. however I have requested all the statements for the 5 years before she died to be sent to me by post. Because I also want to see how much she actually spent and how much of it is interest and charges ...... my mum *god rest her soal was a illiterate unemployed alcoholic so there will be no written accounts from her...

 

Personally I think the lending was wholly irresponcible in the first place considering she had no income ! who gives a credit card to an unemployed alcoholic who is already tied up with debts of over 20k not including morgages!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all ever so much for your advice so far .... I'm not stupid by any most standards but I can't help feeling that because I don' t have in depth knowledge of the legal rights surrounding the case that RBS are just hoping to railroad me into something to scratch back some minor amount so some call centre phone jockey can meet their repayments target at my expence!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the real world of the finance industry. They are not content with the tax payer bailing them out, awarding themselves millions in bonuses but they also want to screw the last penny out of the little people as well.

 

As you have experienced, they want their cake and they want to eat it as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From now on do not speak to them on the 'phone, if they contact you tell them you will only communicate in writing. In that way it leaves a nice paper trail which they cannot deny & they certainly won't commit to paper what they'll say on a 'phone.

 

Once they receive the letter in post #8 they must produce evidence of an enforceable debt, if they try to pursue otherwise they'll be in breach of OFT guidelines & you could sue for harassment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

cerberusalert - wow thank you, this might just be the thing.... So if there were no payments between June 06 and now and she has never sent them a letter accepting the debt I don't have to pay it! AND they have to stop hassling me! so IF I demand a copy of any correspondance my mother sent and the statements - I should be able to prove the debt is Statute Barred ... so if .. and I'm not expecting there are but if she has paid within the past 6 years could I just hold out until the 6 year has passed then it is statute ? Also I had to sent them birth certificate and probate letters explaining that she had died ... would this count as me admittin gto the debt? or did it have to be me Mum who sent a letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

RBS will know perfectly well that this debt is stature barred! while the fact that it's SB doesn't stop them from chasing the debt, they cannot take any legal action to recover the money. Looks like they are relying on your ignorance of the law to get you to agree to pay this off when you have no obligation to. Disgusting behaviour from RBS !

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all ever so much for your advice so far .... I'm not stupid by any most standards but I can't help feeling that because I don' t have in depth knowledge of the legal rights surrounding the case that RBS are just hoping to railroad me into something to scratch back some minor amount so some call centre phone jockey can meet their repayments target at my expence!

 

This is why I asked if they'd put it down on paper... these firms are happy to leech of the lives of people and threaten all and everything over the phone, much less likely to put something in writing that wont stand up in court, its not unheard of but unlikely.

 

If they phone you just tell them you are recording the call for your protection and evidence purposes, this also seems to put them on the back foot :-D

 

Hopefully the letter re: SB should be all that is required

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose It doesnt make things any worse for me is I sent them the SB letter and It's wrong though right? I'll look stupid but It's worth a try right? -Thanks to you all . If this works and I don't have to pay it I will certainly make the biggest donation I possibly can and recommend the site to anybody who has these types of problems and suggest they do the same !!!!

 

I'll keep my fingers crossed the statements dont show any payments for mum !

Link to post
Share on other sites

The advice you have received is great, but just as a back-up, make sure the house been put into your name with Land Registry. If it's in your name I'm sure this would benefit you further and they would never be able to get a charging order on the property (as I said, just as a back-up).

Link to post
Share on other sites

:whoo:

 

I can't believe this site and the amazing people on it have given me more sane advise in 1 evening than days of scouring the internet and complimentary initial consultations with solicitors.

 

My sincerest thanks to you all. Cerberusalert especially I may actually sleep tonight thanks to you.....:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats what we are here for

 

just to reassure you

 

both my parents died in quick order

 

i did the whole thing myself and even with debts within 6yrs no-one got anything.

 

there is absolutely no way any financial institute will go anywhere near a court unless the old debts are more than a few £1000

 

they will never want the bad publicity.

 

sleep tight

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...