Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

lt4waf v HSBC PPI - Need assistance with how much to claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4707 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello :-)

 

I love this place, and i can usually dig out the information i need in order to assist me with my questions. I'm having a lot of trouble getting my head around the interest i should be adding to my PPI claim however.

 

I have downloaded the CAG PPI Calculator excel sheet (attached), and i think i've filled it out right, though i cannot be certain. If there is anyone out there that would be so generous as to have a wee peek at my figures and results below from the calculator and comment i'd be very grateful.

 

Some background....

 

I'm actually about to claim for 2 unsecured loans which stiffed me for PPI. One with HSBC and one with Halifax. I'll concentrate on HSBC here and apply any knowledge shared or gained to the Halifax claim as they are the exact same type of loan for the same principle amount.

 

HSBC

--------

 

Date of Loan: 3/11/1998 (I have the original loan agreement.)

-------------------

Principal Loan

-------------------

Loan: £10,000

Total Charge for Credit: £2864

APR: 10.9%

Total Amount Payable: £12,864

 

60 Monthly Payments: £214.40

------------------------------------------

Credit Protection Insurance Loan

------------------------------------------

Loan: £1825.40

Total Charge for Credit: £521.25

APR: 10.9%

Total Amount Payable: £2341.25

 

Initial Payment: £38.48

59 Monthly Payments: £39.03

-------------------------------------------

Total Initial Monthly Payment: £252.88

59 Monthly Payments: £253.43

 

I am seeking restitution to include the return of all my monies paid for the PPI, and additionally around 13 years interest from the first payment until the date the matter is settled either by the bank or the court.

 

My first hurdle is do i claim simple interest at the statutory amount of 8%?

 

Or do i claim for compounded contractual interest, and if so how on earth do i find out what figure to apply to every interest calculation?

 

After filling out the CAG PPI Calculate Spreadsheet the results are as follows, i must confess to not having any understanding of how this works and the results it shows:-

 

Loan Details

-----------------

PPI Premium: £2341.25

APR: 10%

Monthly Int %: 0.870

Monthly PPI Int: £20.37 (automatically worked out by spreadsheet)

 

For statutory interest from the first payment until now the sheet throws up:-

 

Total Paid: £3563.45

Total Interest: £3345.29

Total Refund Required: £6908.74

 

For compounded contractual interest from the first payment and using the APR of 10.9% as that's all i have to go on the sheet throws up:-

 

Total Paid: £3563.45

Total Interest: £9387.93

Total Refund Required: £12,951.38

 

Is the refund required in addition to PPI total of £2431.25?

 

Do the above refunds seem valid enough?

 

I want to be sure of what i am claiming for and that my claim is valid incase i have to take everything to court.

 

I welcome anyones's thoughts good or bad, thanks for reading and sorry it turned out to be so long winded, i really hope i haven't made my situation worse by confusing you all....lol

 

Thanks :-)

CAG PPI Calculator1.xls

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO you should follow the info on the FOS website

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

You only need a simple interest calculator for your loans.....use this one

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/Spreadsheets/England/Simple-charges-calc.xls

 

I looked at your spreadsheet and it is incorrect because for loan 1 you have entered the amount of loan as being £12,864....it should be £10,000. Didn't look further as this alone is enough to throw the calculations.

 

You don't claim compound interest on a loan...you claim the amount of each ppi payment including the interest charged by the bank per the agreement + 8% stat int from the date of each of those payments.

 

So for loan 1, the first payment was £38.48 and subsequent payments were £39.03. You enter these figures in the spreadsheet I have linked to together with the dates thay were paid and it calculates the 8% interest for you.

 

Also have a read of the fos stuff that dx has pointed you to.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you DX and IMS for taking the time to help me out.

 

The spreadsheet you attached has made things very easy to work out thank you.

 

I've filled it out and have the total for the 60 months which concluded in Oct 2003 and is £4,229.92

 

It is now 2011, am i allowed to claim the interest on £4,229.92 between Oct 2003 and now at 8% also?

 

If this money was in the bank or invested it would have grown since 2003.

 

Thanks again, you've been a big help in getting me to understand where i stand.

 

lt4waf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you DX and IMS for taking the time to help me out.

 

The spreadsheet you attached has made things very easy to work out thank you.

 

I've filled it out and have the total for the 60 months which concluded in Oct 2003 and is £4,229.92

 

It is now 2011, am i allowed to claim the interest on £4,229.92 between Oct 2003 and now at 8% also?

 

If this money was in the bank or invested it would have grown since 2003.

 

Thanks again, you've been a big help in getting me to understand where i stand.

 

lt4waf

 

 

Hi

 

Yes you do claim the 8% right up to date. You will find that the spreadsheet has done it for you. If you put the cursor in a cell in the interest column you will see that it contains a reference in the formula to NOW(). This is the current date so your interest has been calculated right up to now.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

blimey the old vampiress spreadsheet

not seen that in years!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...