Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I would guess so dx which is why I've asked the OP to upload the original invoice.
    • ps i doubt the PCN says macdonalds?? MET dont operate a reverse trespass car park for mc'd's parkers going to starbucks...(occupants left vehicle claim) they only do that for the starbucks part  i bet you parked in the starbuck side and walked to MCd's? dx    
    • it is NOT A FINE.....this is an extremely important point to understand no-one bar a magistrate in a magistrates criminal court can ever fine anyone for anything. Private Parking Tickets (speculative invoices) are NOT a criminal matter, merely a speculative contractual Civil matter hence they can only try a speculative monetary claim via the civil county court system (which is no more a legal powers matter than what any member of Joe Public can do). Until/unless they do raise a county court claim a CCJ and win, there are not ANY enforcement powers they can undertake other than using a DCA, whom are legally powerless and are not BAILIFFS. Penalty Charge Notices issued by local authorities etc were decriminalised years ago - meaning they no longer can progress a claim to the magistrates court to enforce, but go directly to legal enforcement via a real BAILIFF themselves. 10'000 of people waste £m's paying private parking companies because they think they are FINES...and the media do not help either. the more people read the above the less income this shark industry get. where your post said fine it now says charge .............. please fill out the Q&A ASAP. dx  
    • Well done on reading the other threads. If ECP haven't got the guts to do court then there is no reason to pay them. From other threads there is a 35-minute free stay after which you need to pay, with the signs hidden where no-one will read them.  Which probably explains why ECP threaten this & threaten that, but in the end daren't do court. As for your employer - well you can out yourself as the driver to ECP so the hamster bedding will arrive at yours.  Get your employer to do that using the e-mail address under Appeals and Transfer Of Liability.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Taking someone to court in Scotland


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4699 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All- I am hoping to get some guidance on an issue where someone owes me about £4800. We had a contractual agreement where they agreed to terms and conditions over the email and promised to sign and return the documents, but besides my efforts the signed form was never forwarded but I do have emails confirming. I am owed £4800 for a lot of hard work.

 

I am not sure but there are certain restrictions of how much money can I retrieve through small claims court. It is my understanding that the amount is £3k which can be claimed through small claims, which is the cheapest route as I will know the costs up front. The downside being that I will have to let go £1800 of rightfully owed sums.

 

What are my options? Any thoughts.

 

Appreciate the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I used Summary Cause actions agains a couple of Banks, limits are between £3,000 and £5,000, forms are almost identical the only extra cost is having to pay Sheriff Officers to serve your court papers,

I would think this would cost you no more than £30.

 

The only down side, if you were to lose you would have to pay the other sides costs.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input. In my case, I will be representing myself and I am almost certain that the other party will be represented by a solicitor. I am confident I will prevail, but the probability of failure always stands given that solicitor will have more "legal" experience despite whatever the facts may be.

 

Having said that, what do you think about this situation? Take the risk of representing myself and facing a solicitor whose costs can be quite a bit, if I were to loose my case. Is there an upper limit as to how much can I end up paying in their legal costs, if I were to loose?

 

Can I just decide to minimize my risk and take the small claims court route and let go of £1800.

 

Any thoughts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'll try to get someone else to have a look at this and advise if possible, as a general rule, court expenses are awarded to the person who succeeds in the case.

These expenses must then be paid by the unsuccessful party.

 

Expenses are normally calculated at the end of the case by the sheriff clerk, who then has his or her calculation approved by the sheriff.

 

Sorry I'm not sure if there's a limit to this, I'll have a look around.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be great. I just want to make sure that if it goes against me then is it better to let go of £1800 at the outset or take a chance of getting hit with a big legal bill. Better to be prepared so I know I won't get stuck with thousands of pounds of counter party legal bills.

 

Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no limit as such with summary or ordianry cause actions but they have to be approved by the court.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

I recently took 2 people to summary cause court and won and we represented ourselves on both occasions. On one of those occasions the Defender hired a very expensive lawyer. I sympathize with your uncertainty, as you are taking a risk, but for me it was all about the preparation and, of course being very certain of your case. The costs are decided on by the court, so although if we had lost we would have been liable to pay towards his legal fees, I had to assume that we wouldn't have to pay every penny of them as he didn't have to have a £250 an hour lawyer! But the rules appear to be a bit muddy.

 

If you have your evidence to support your case; are reasonably articulate then I would give it a go. You can withdraw at any stage if the other side pull a rabbit out of the hat and you would hopefully limit your losses if the worst happens. £1800 is a lot to loose, but only you can make that call. Happy to help with more specific queries if I can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...