Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi HB,  I have been using it - freedom pass for a long time, this is why i am worried, my memory fails me!  there is no way of checking on the freedom pass usage according my partner.  see my question on your comments: Paragraph 1 a short explanation of why you used the card on the day you were caught worry: as i said i have no excuse other than to save some money  Paragraph 2 you know you made a mistake and you regret it worry: yes i will admit that it is my fault and apologise profusely - will see other template Paragraph 3 you understand how what you did is wrong and the effect it has on TfL worry: yes will do, borrowing words from other template Paragraph 4 you have taken action - tell them what - to ensure that this doesn't happen again worry: i have an oyster PAYG which i use for my journey in to work -ranging 2-3 days a week;  so i can't say that i will buy a season ticket which is more expensive?? Paragraph 5 you ask if they would allow you to pay the outstanding fare and their administrative costs to resolve this worry: i will do that. QuestIon: will they inform my employer?     
    • So they seem to be deliberately fouling Britain - not 'just negligently Need to be in jail alongside the PO crims, and rabidly corrupt MPs
    • Well, we know it seems that the poops and others just use there MP position mainly to generate funds from their 'outside' lol interests Lets hope labor BAN second jobs for Mps - all second jobs - then create a truly independent expenses 'police' with real powers Tip of the iceberg: "A cohort of Conservative MPs standing down before the next election have netted jobs worth millions of pounds and have taken dozens of all-expenses-paid trips funded by foreign governments and lobbyists, the Observer can reveal." so far - "top of the list was former justice secretary Brandon Lewis, who has taken on five new part-time roles worth £410,000 a year alongside his commitments as an MP.   Outgoing Tory MPs take lucrative second jobs and ‘swan off on jollies’ | Conservatives | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Sixty four Tories and four independent MPs who lost party whip plan to stand down from the Commons amid dire polling for Conservatives  
    • The first thing you need to do is for your father to send Argos customer services an email saying he wishes to return the item within the 14 day cooling-off period under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. This is important because he needs simple proof to back up his request, as they are being stubborn. Enclose a copy of receipt details so they can locate the sale, Distant selling regulations will apply as he made the contract online with the retailer and they took the payment. The contract is between your father and ARGOS. He has to cancel the contract and receive a refund back to his debit card. You cannot act on his behalf (Privity) as a third party and they have every right to refuse to deal with you if they so wish. Data Protection the number one issue. How you received the goods is irrelevant. A retailer's terms and conditions cannot derogate statutory obligation.
    • TfL take abuse of staff passes very seriously. If the pass has been confiscated I imagine they will write to them and it could result in the card being suspended for a time, as I understand it. I hope you've told them about the card being confiscated and why? We need to know how many times you used the pass please - how many weeks at 2-3 days a week. Later I would expect TfL to write to you as well, possibly with a schedule of journeys made with the card, to ask you to tell them which journeys were you. They will ask for your side of the story. We can help you to refine a letter to send once they write but you need to start it off because you're the only one who knows the full story. I suggest something like this. Paragraph 1 a short explanation of why you used the card on the day you were caught Paragraph 2 you know you made a mistake and you regret it Paragraph 3 you understand how what you did is wrong and the effect it has on TfL Paragraph 4 you have taken action - tell them what - to ensure that this doesn't happen again Paragraph 5 you ask if they would allow you to pay the outstanding fare and their administrative costs to resolve this Please don't copy and paste what I've said, use your own words. HB NB This is a suggested reply, don't send it before they write to you because we need to see what they say.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Skyline v NatWest


r33skyline
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6313 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Afternoon all

 

I am trying to list my unfair bank charges

 

Can i claim Debit Interest ?

 

I also have a

 

CASH OUT - BRANCH £4906 @ £0.57p per £100 = £27.96,

 

PAYMENT OUT - MANUAL 18 @ £0.67 EACH =£12.06

 

ARE THESE DEEMED FAIR OR UNFAIR ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afternoon all

 

I am trying to list my unfair bank charges

 

Can i claim Debit Interest ?

 

I also have a

 

CASH OUT - BRANCH £4906 @ £0.57p per £100 = £27.96,

 

PAYMENT OUT - MANUAL 18 @ £0.67 EACH =£12.06

 

ARE THESE DEEMED FAIR OR UNFAIR ?

 

please can you explain

debit interest?

 

cash out and payment out no sorry.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

L Lad

 

The debit interest

 

I have no explanation and its only £1.00 i shall ignore for the moment

 

thankyou for the help .

 

 

hi you cant claim it. only charges eg unpaid DD/SO CHEQUE referal Overlimit and missed payment. trhe FAQs help to guide you through the process:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes its a penalty for being overdrawn at £3.50 per day

 

from natweststaffmember

 

Originally Posted by natweststaffmember

Have amended the thread so that Uarranged borrowing fee formerly called excess borrowing is now there so YES you can claim them back

 

Hope that helps

 

 

NWSM

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have completed my spreadsheet with five years of charges

 

I have been looking for a suitable letter template to use to send with my spreadsheet asking for these unfair charges to be refunded to me

 

Does such a template exist ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

This is the correct letter.

 

Not sure i like this letter if its the right one

 

If you don't like it then write your own, but our letters are tried and tested and have been used successfully thousands of times.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I sent the spread sheet and prelim letter to NatWest and thet have written back to say their charges are fair ,reasonable and transparent

 

I claimed on the spread sheet

 

Excess Borrowing

Paid Referal Fee

Unpaid Items

Referal Charge

 

Copy of letter received fron Nat West

 

Dear Mr xxxxx

 

Thankyou for your letterof 16th September 2006 recieived at my office on the 3rd October 2006 about the charges you incurred over the last six years .I am sorry youwere unhappy with the service you received but grateful that you took time to write to explain why.

 

we believe that our charges are fair , reasonable and transparent.We considerthat the amounts debited to your account have been applied strictly in accordance with your agreement with us and our published tariff,which we are satisfied,complies with all applicable laws and regulations.We are also committed to ensuring the transparency of the information that we give to our customers about the operation and products.

 

In case you wish to take this matter further i have enclosed a leafletexplaining the options available to you.I hope you will not find it nesessary,and if there is still anything that you consider unresolved do call me on 02380273428 and i will be happy to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Just a little advice I found helpful.

Have a read of other people's threads (especially those who are quite a bit further down the track) as you will find that a lot of letters others have recieved from the bank are very similar and you can compare those you receive to them.

It gives you a lot more confidence when you know others are getting the same standard letters as yourself and winning their money back.

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A copy of my claim through Money Claim as of today ...£ 120 court fee was a little expensive i thought .Trust i will be refunded if i win .

 

 

. The Claimant has an account 157XXXXX with the Defendant, opened 1990 2. Since 30/11/2000 the Defendant debited charges and interest in respect of purported breaches of contract. 3. Defendant is aware of all details as a list of charges has already been supplied. Another copy will be sent. 4. Claimant contends: (a) The charges exceed the Defendant's losses caused by the breaches; (b) The Term permitting the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and at Common Law. 5. Claimant claims: (a) return of the amounts debited of £1455.50; (b) Interest per S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% - £301.96 continuing at 8% until judgment or settlement at a daily rate of £0.32; 6. Alternatively, if the charges are a fee for a service, then they must be reasonable under S.15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. 7. Costs allowed by the Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

jane641

 

I have recieved this from Moneyclaim,where does this leave me ?

 

Nat West Bank

spacer.gif********

Defence

You are unable to take any further action online on this claim.

 

The Defendant disputes the whole amount you have claimed. Your claim cannot proceed online and will be transferred to the appropriate court for continuation. You will receive confirmation to where the claim has been transferred to shortly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...