Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi dx It's with Step Change. Yes that is the balance outstanding plus interest.
    • Hi All, I don't want to keep asking unnecessary and daft questions but as I read up on on stuff to prepare my defence and tthink about my witness statement, I am perusing the following: The BPA Code of practice states under 13. Consideration and Grace Periods: 13.1 The driver must have the chance to consider the Terms and Conditions before entering into the ‘parking contract’ with you. If, having had that opportunity, the driver decides not to park but chooses to leave the car park, you must provide them with a reasonable consideration period to leave, before the driver can be bound by your parking contract. The amount of time in these instances will vary dependant on site size and type but it must be a minimum of 5 minutes. 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place.   Let's say a motorist spends a minimum of 5 minutes to decide, then decides to park, that 5 minutes now doesn't apply? That doesn't make sense to me. So now that a motorist has parked after consideration, thus commencing the parking period, the decision time doesn't apply and parking time commenced when? .... on entry to the car park? This, as far as I can see is not stated in the [Withdrawn] Government document which says: The Code also makes clear that the consideration period ends at the point when the driver has parked and is therefore considered to have accepted the terms and conditions, which could be within the five-minute allowance. Doesn't say anything about it not applying if a parking event takes place.   [Withdrawn] Private Parking Code of Practice: explanatory document – how was it developed and what will it change? - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK So, according to the BPA, if a motorist inadvertently overstayed by 12 minutes for example, they have the 10 minute grace period but because they decided to park, they don't have the 5 minute consideration period because they decided to park and have overstayed by 2 minutes? Sorry if there's something I'm missing here.  
    • there are several threads here already whereby the judge in such cases only made an order to pay the required sum, the registering of a criminal record is at their discretion or not. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

NUmber of Credit Accounts has doubled on Experian Credit Report


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4706 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Got a text from Experian today saying changes had been made to my Credit File. I logged on when I got home to see my balance owing total had risen bu over £4,000 and the number of credit accounts (including those settled) had doubled to 46.

 

Checked my Credit Report to see that nearly all of my accounts had been duplicated on my Credit Report, including 2 defaults for the same account and two satisfied defaults for another account.

 

Have emailed them asking them to remove all of the duplicated entries. Will let you know how I get on.

 

Has anybody else encountered this before?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's worth sending a complaint by snail mail to,I have emails take longer to get action.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I had the exact same thing happen to me, I emailed them and they blamed me, something about there being two addresses linked to my file - when in fact they were one and the same! Some rubbish story I think to cover up the fact that something had gone wrong with their system.

 

Anyway they cleared it up quickly - within about 3 days (over a weekend) and my credit file looked far more healthy without all the duplicate accounts.

 

Lottieapple

Edited by lottieapple
rubbish spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Mines got duplicated x3 which made for interesting but very confusing reading, i emailed them and they sorted it out within a few days. They claimed it wouldn't affect a credit report in any way but surely having 12 defaults is worse than 4.

Have £20k+ in debt, seriously want to be debt free, currently in temporary accomodation and having business problems.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah, I wondered what had happened. Which CRA was this.. mine was CallCredit.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's worth sending a complaint by snail mail to,I have emails take longer to get action.

 

my experience with the CRAs is that letters do indeed get treated with more gravity and speed than emails, yes. It may be a waste of money but if they are sent recorded they see you mean business and will follow up any non-response.

 

ps my o/h had 35+ 'aliases' on her file. why? because she got married and had a maiden name 10+ years ago which she hasn't used once since. What did Exqueerian do about it? Nuffin, not y email anayway. That changed when put pen to paper; but, even now there are 20 entries and of these 15 are by the same lender. Bleedin disgrace. They tell us it makes no difference to a credit score but how can it otherwise?

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is an unrecorded search it has no impact, \i use all 3 CRA's in my other life and have

never seen such data.when carrying out searches.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is an unrecorded search it has no impact, \i use all 3 CRA's in my other life and have

never seen such data.when carrying out searches.

 

i too had a problem with credit expert. got my rating to 999 after a long time. checked it 3 months later to find it had dropped to 466!

checked my report and found to my horror that every institution i was involved with was shown in triplicate!

my debts had risen from £18000 to £58000.

 

i contacted credit expert by email, and recieved a reply stating that it was because my name and address had been inserted twice (not by me). they would correct the input and all should be well.

 

3weeks later and its done. back to normal, but its cost me £20+ to check! a nice little earner for the cra's me thinks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DS,

I have four so called alias entries 1 as Mr. 1 as Dr. (Ph.D.) and 1 with Rank 1 with no title all:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you told them to put that right? To my mind it has to look as if a consumer is trying to obtain credit by deception if there are 30+ aliases on her credit file. it doesn't look good whichever way you look at it. I remember sitting behind counsel on a criminal fraud case many years back as a junior clerk and the defendants were a couple who got credit and businness loans by changing their names slightly and odd little differences in their potsal address which computers weren't picking up on. So, on one hand while I can see where the CRAs are coming from, on the other hand it makes decent, hardworking ordinary people look like bleedin fraudsters when all they have done is got married and reported their maiden name on credit applications.

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i too had a problem with credit expert. got my rating to 999 after a long time. checked it 3 months later to find it had dropped to 466!

checked my report and found to my horror that every institution i was involved with was shown in triplicate!

my debts had risen from £18000 to £58000.

 

i contacted credit expert by email, and recieved a reply stating that it was because my name and address had been inserted twice (not by me). they would correct the input and all should be well.

 

3weeks later and its done. back to normal, but its cost me £20+ to check! a nice little earner for the cra's me thinks.

 

I honestly think bad data is a bigger problem than they let on. Its so damaging as well. In my opinion they should suffer some form of litigation to get themselves in gear. All issues affect the consumer not them! they still get their bureau fees from the lenders irrespective of whether the consumers data is of bad or good quality. Try and get the costs refunded as a minimum. threaten legal action (obvioulsy you will have to back this up + also write to the data protection officer). The credit expert thing is a con as well - £8 pe rmonth for your data!!!! shocking the only thing it does is give you an idea of how your crdit file is interpretted by lenders, and there are some free apps that can do that. If you have an iphone i found icreditscore to be really helpful, you can take data off your credit file and it gives you a score and tells you where you would probably lose points and its free!if you choose any litigtion good luck!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GMJ, I agree with much of what you say but as to credit reports from ''other CRA'S users should be aware

that the data even from the 3rd. largest CRA used in the UK is often misleading and out of date

and may give you a totally different picture from that seen by potential lenders on the 2 main CRA's.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

IIf you have an iphone i found icreditscore to be really helpful, you can take data off your credit file and it gives you a score and tells you where you would probably lose points and its free!

 

any more information on this mate? is it available on-line?

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe that there are 2 new ''reference agencies '' advertising at the moment the one mentioned above and

creditcondidential.com which it would seem is a call credit spin off.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

a cruel credit spin off? fookin ell, that must be really c-rap

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've taken a free trial will post up the results:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you think phil james works there now? lol

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...