Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3639 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I am just starting to get my life in order after years of being in massive debt. This site has been invaluable but this is my first post so please be gentle with me.

 

About 3 years ago I took out a £200 loan with provident (yes I know how stupid that was) and over the next few years I borrowed more and more. I have now started to get back on my feet due and have been trying to pay off all my debts. I asked my agent for an early balance settlement and was told it was just under £3k (Yes I know I was stupid to take it out in the first place) but now I'm in a better position and my credit rating has improved I was able to take a loan out with a sensible apr with my bank and I paid the balance off in full with a cheque. I was finally free of provident!

 

However, and this is where it gets complicated, about three weeks before I settled my balance I had an issue with my bank because I changed name and address and for some reason they froze my account as they thought there was fraudulent activity and I had a couple of items returned etc including a cheque payable to provident. I asked my agent at the time if it was the only one returned unpaid as the problems with my bank continued for over a week but she said it was just the one cheque. That was back in March. My balance was settled in April. Yesterday I had a letter pushed through my door asking me to phone my local provident office regarding monies owed. I rang them this afternoon and they told me that one of the other cheques I made in March had been returned because the signature didn't match records or something. This meant that my accounts had been reopened and as I haven't paid since April I owe a lot. She said if I pay by tomorrow the full balance it is just under £400 but it I can't pay tomorrow then I'll have to go back to weekly payments and will eventually pay £1300ish.

 

I am devastated by this as I simply do not have £400 spare. I said I was more than willing to pay for the amount the cheque was (£70) and even a small admin charge but she told me I obviously don't understand and that she would come out to me as I would have to pay. I explained that they must have known the cheque had bounced weeks before they gave me a settlement figure but she said that the cheque has only just come back (I know barclays take a while to process cheques but 8 weeks seems a bit excessive).

 

She is coming to see me tomorrow or Monday. I'm not trying to get out of what I actually owe and will pay the amount on the cheque but does anyone have any ideas as to what I should say about the rest?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems very unfair, I will try and find some help for you.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your first port of call is to make a complaint to Barclays. If the incorrect information was givenyou by phone they should have (might have) a record of it on your file.

Steven

 

Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here

 

Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial

My Wins

 GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007

NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007

Brighthouse Won unconditionally August 2007

Goldfish Won unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra)

Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.

 

Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the cheque bouncing aside, I'd be looking for a full SAR request to check all unlawful charges on this account!

 

I would then be reclaiming all of them with CI and Stat Interest!

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

on a bank account....

 

i think it rather cheeky for provi to do this

they fleece people blind with int rate.

 

IMHO you should only pay them what you owe [bounced cheque value]

 

regardless to the 'agent' coming around

 

you do realise they have NO LEGAL POWERS to demand payment off you.

 

nor hike up their rates ...

 

call their bluff.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...