Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help Needed Claiming PPI from piccadilly Finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4687 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

I have taken a fewPPI policies out with piccadilly finance over the last 10 yrs, I believe they have all been mis sold, My problem is that Piccadilly Finance appear to have gone out of business, I contacted southern pacific who the loan was with and they said that they did not sell me the policy.

Who do I make the claims to.

 

Any advice will be much appreciated.

 

 

Andrew

Link to post
Share on other sites

fire the FOS complaint form [PPI] offto whom ever you were paying your PCM to in the first instance.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX

I have already written to Southern Pacific,( Now acenden). They say that I need to make the complaint to the broker. I am unable to do this as Piccadilly finance are no longer trading.

It was picadilly finance who sold the policies, but southern pacific who provided the finance, for the premium.

The premium was paid via a loan attatched to the original loan(what a mug I was).

 

Where do I go from here

:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taximan,

 

Matters not who sold the policy, your claim is with whoever you were making your monthly repayments to.

 

Personally I would write back to Southern Pacific asking them to reconsider and if they still believe they are not liable to issue this in writing as their final response so you may refer the case to the Financial ombudsman service.

 

Good luck

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Their latter states the following

"Our investigation has identified that London personal loans was not party to any discussion concerning the sale of the loan or PPI.

The responsibility of the sale rests with the company who introduced you tp london personal loans. we must therefore refer you back to the broker. please note the brokeris not an agent of london personal loans, we are sorry but we are not able to uphold your complaint, if we have not heard from you within 21 days we will close your file."

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have not said anything about their final offer and therefore you must write back asking them to reconsider or confirm this as their final offer.

 

Until you have it in writing that this is their final offer, you cannot refer your case to the FOS.

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

It seems there is nothing to suggest that this is their final offer, so I will do as you said and write asking for confirmation of this.

When i receive a final offer is the FOS the best way to go about things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is only you can decide which route to take.

 

Your choices are fos which does not cost you anything but will likely take several months due to the number of cases they are handling, or the small claims court provided the amount you are claiming is less than £5,000.

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...