Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC PPi claim advice needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4323 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Forum,

 

My first post so please be gentle ;)

 

I'm in the process of claiming PPI applied to personal loan taken in 2005.

 

SAR request send to bank (HSBC) on the 21/04 and in the meantime I phoned the bank to complain about mis-sold policy. Bank replied to my complain last Friday in writing stating they will look into the matter and requested to fill attached questionnaire and send it back to them.

 

This is where I need your advice...

 

Do I now wait for them to 'investigate' or do I send the letter to the bank together with the questionnaire requesting full refund and if yes are there any template letters I could use?

 

Secondly I expect the bank to tell me get lost after sending the prem letter so can I find any guidance on preparing the Court papers on forum pages?

 

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks,

Greg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Welcome to CAG.:welcome:

 

The questionnaire is part of their internal investigation. Fill it in and send it off to them with a simple letter stating why you think you were mis-sold and requesting a full refund.

 

You never know, you might be lucky and they cough up.

 

If not, the SAR will give you all the information to prepare your claim.

 

In the meantime, have a look around the ppi forum and the rest of the site. Do a lot of reading. There is a great deal of info here which will help you.

 

Keep your thread updated and you will get help when you need it.

 

Good luck with your claim

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd actually download and fill in the one on the FOS website

as well as read some of the very imformative PDF's there.

 

fire that off and then HSBC will know you mean business.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Quick question i don't want to put my phone numbers down as i removed them from their systems when i was having trouble with them do i have to fill those in cos i don't want them passing my numbers on they can have my email addy would that be okay???

Link to post
Share on other sites

only fill in what you want too

 

its not compulsory.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

advice needed please...

 

I was just about to send 'letter before action' when a letter from HSBC arrived stating they are working on resolving the issue and will get back to me in the next 16 weeks.

 

should I wait or proceed with lba?

 

please advice.

 

thanks,

g

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

16 weeks is the amount of time the FSA has given to look at PPI complaints before they can be referred to fos. If you are going the fos route, they won't accept your case until the 16 weeks has passed and/or you have the final decision from the bank.

 

If you are going the court route then you can set your own timescales.

 

Have a look at the ppi successes and the wins in court Stickies as this may help you with your decision.

 

What is the amount of your claim?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi greg

 

Ok so you can do a prelim letter demanding refund in 14 days. They of course won't pay (unless they break with tradition) and will give you the 16 week tosh.

 

After 14 days its 14 day lba and then if still no payment issue in court.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

prem letter was sent to them on 09/06, lba now in the post

 

knowing the way they operate I'll be surprised to see any positive response before I go the court route; but I hope they will surprise me :)

 

thanks very much for all your help so far

g

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't expect a quick response from HSBC, my claim has been with them since October 2010 and they are still 'investigating' it.

 

Hi Derwent

 

What is the value of your claim?

 

Have you considered taking them to court?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its for £2,870 plus interest. I don't want to take them to court for the simple reason that I have some arrears on a credit card with them and they may reciprocate !

 

And I take it you still want that card? If its in arrears are they still allowing you to use it then?

 

If there are arrears on the card I guess there will be late payment fees on that which could come back to you.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

hi,

 

looks like hsbc is gearing up to defend my case

 

attached is the scan of the letter I've received today

 

can someone PLEASE advise me the best way to proceed/respond

 

my points in relation to the letter...

 

1) both loans and ppi's arranged over the phone long time ago so no names in my memory; in a way I was hoping that SAR and CD that arrived with it will contain those conversations but no joy, only few recent calls related to everyday banking

 

2) apart from going over the application process I was told that my application will not be successfully unless PPI was purchased (ground for my claim)

 

3) I've been given 'Personal and Graduate Loan Protection Plan' - information pack and 'Personal and Graduate Loan Protection Plan' - policy document and finally 'Demands, Needs and Recommendations: Personal Lending Protection' where you tick number of boxes and sign at the end

 

4) I did

 

5) there was no other way, if I didn't check a box I wouldn't get a loan, simple

 

Please can you help.

 

g

ppi-scan.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

it will all be in my POC sir

 

bugger off no peeking till you get it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it will all be in my POC sir

 

bugger off no peeking till you get it.

 

dx

 

Yep I agree

 

Don't play your hand in advance.

 

Methinks you have them verily on the back foot

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for coming back to me folks!

 

just checked my MCOL claim status and HSBC issued a defence on 19/08/2011 with transfer to my local court

 

what do I do now, wait? and how about their request for my calculation? Shall I respond to their last letter in any way?

 

gotta say I'm getting a bit nervous :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

received bank defence today, and here are the main points (quite few in fact)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

1) the POC are lacking in particularity and incomplete

 

2) the claimant has failed to identify in any proper detail all the matters relating to the loan agreements or PPI policies he alleges give rise to this claim

 

3) further, and without limitation, the claimant has failed to identify: a) the precise duties he alleges he was owed b) any or any proper details of how it is alleged that the defendant breached those duties c) how the sum claimed has been calculated

 

4) The defendant intends to defend the claim.

 

5) furthermore, in connection to loan agreements, it is admitted that the claimant purchased PPI at the time he entered into them. in so far as it is relevant, it is averred that the PPI policies provided to the Claimant was optional and the claimant was free to enter into policies or not. the application form for the loans included a section to be signed by the customer to indicate whether or not they wished to purchase PPI. it is further averred that the Defendant would not not have provided the Claimant with optional PPI cover unless he had signed that section. It is specifically denied that the Defendant, it's employees or agents would ever indicate to customers that PPI was a compulsory product. This allegation is incorrect and misguided notwithstanding the lack of particularisation. The Defendant avers that it had strict rules and procedures in place for arranging personal loans and it's terms and conditions were clear, fair and not misleading.

 

6) in so far it is relevant to his claim, the Claimant is put to strict proof to show he did not sign for PPI and that he did not consent to purchase it. In any event, he was entitled to cancel coverage during a 30 day cooling off period. he did not do so and continued to pay for it under loans were completed

 

7) The Defendant will rely on the full force and the effect of the terms and conditions of the Agreements and the optional PPI that Claimant opted to purchase.

 

8) the Defendant will say that at the time of entering into the Agreements the Claimant would have been provided with all relevant terms and conditions of his loans and the respective optional payment protection policy

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

I still have the will to fight this claim but I really need your help now...

 

should I now respond to last letter received from the bank?

can I add more details to POC and send it together with the Allocation Questionnaire?

can my calculation be attached to AQ?

and what about points 5, 6, 7 and 8

 

anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I've made a fundamental mistake of providing my POC using MCOL website and not in full with N1 form :(

 

I have until 05/09 to fill and return my AQ.

 

Is there any way I can at this stage apply for amendment to POC and if yes, how do I go about that?

 

please advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The legals are outside my experience but if you hit the black triangle and report your post you can leave the team a message asking for one of the more legal minded to have a look at this for you.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...