Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MBNA and Arrow Global - claim form received - bal prob all unlawful charges ***Struck Out With Costs***


MrHat
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3947 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Letters usually gather dust at the bottom of the DJ,s in tray its normally N244,s that are dealt with briskly maybe due to the fee?

By all means try a letter but considering you are requesting judgment in your favour and your PT 20 claim and costs maybe £40 would be worthwhile.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 614
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

One more q.

 

Should the other side have responded to the cc? I.e defending it?

 

I never got a aq for the cc.

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they have 14 days to respond to your claim,I think it may be appropriate MR H to find out what exactly is the status of you PT 20 claim, why no AQ?

If its been lost in the system perhaps request a refund and go with plan B as discussed above.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi ANdy. I want to fire this off and see if it works. Is it ok as is? I haven't put together a schedule of costs yet and was hoping to do that once (and if) the judge goes ahead and strikes out. Or do I need to do it all in one go? Thoughts?

 

 

It is noted that the Claimant has now failed to file in court their Allocation Questionnaire despite being ordered to do so by 20th February 2012

 

The Claimant has had every opportunity to file an Allocation Questionnaire and considering the size of the organisation, it is not unreasonable for them to have filed such documentation on time at the first opportunity. They have since been given a final chance to file the document (by 19th April 2012) and they appear to have ignored the Honourable Judge’s orders and have failed to comply as directed.

I would therefore request that pursuant to the directions given given by the Honourable Judge, that the claim is struck out and judgement awarded to the Defendant and that the Claimant be ordered to pay the Defendant’s costs to be assessed on the standard basis and pursuant to the provisions of The Litigants in Person (Costs and Expenses) Act 1975.

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I cant see anything wrong with your proposal, don't worry about your schedule of costs for now as you have it covered within your request.Is this going in a letter or an application?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

well the Court keep telling me that it does not need an application or a fee. I can see their point as you'd think it is covered by my recent N244 application for a strike out which triggered the judge to write to the Claaimant to give them another chance. But then again, they could be wrong!!!

 

My thought is to try this and if it doesn't work, I will follow up with yet another application.

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My letter is with the judge apparently. It may take up to 10 days to hear back. All fingers and toes crossed here....

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm....just rang the court for an update -and apparently there was an unless order issued on the 11th may saying that unless they file their AQ by 23rd May, the case will be struck out...so this means that they have been given yet another chance!!!!! and I didn't receive a copy of this.

 

If this had been the other way round, I am convinced that i would have a CCJ by now. It seems the court system is loathed to find in favour of the defendant when a creditor has started legal proceedings.

 

How can it be that a judge can write to the claimant and say that they need to file AQ by 19th April or the case will be struck out, and then when they fail to do so, all that happens is another extension???

 

FUMING!

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Over a month late and still leniency unbelievable.4.00pm tomorrow Mr on the phone and demand it be struck out.In all honesty I'm sure that's what the Claimants wants then they don't have to discontinue.

How can you be 2month and 3 days late and the Court still issues "unless Orders"?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was originally due in February Andy!

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was originally due in February Andy!
:!:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE: Decided to give the court a call as the deadline was 4pm on the 23rd. They have NOT received AQ (but if it was sent in just before the deadline, it may take a few days to show up on the system so not counting my chickens yet).

 

I never received a copy of the unless order which was issued on 11th May. The cpurt lady is popping one in the post to me. I got her to read it to me and it said the following (roughly):

 

Unless the claimant completes and files an AQ by 4pm on the 23rd May, the case will be automatically struck out without further order of the court and the claimant shall pay the defendant's costs in line with LIP rules blah blah etc.

 

Off on a business trip early next week so will ring and check if they did file in time next Thurs. Tick tock........

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds promising but we've been here before. :roll:

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE - Called the court and the order has not been complied with. This will apparently trigger the civil team to confirm that the claim is struck out and and confirmation will be sent to both claimant and me soon. (One thing he did say is that, as with all orders, they can appeal but would have to provide a good reason as to why they haven't complied)Sounds pretty positive to me.Will wait for the order before trying for costs.

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent Mr Hat

 

Not before time, let me know once you have received the order and I will amend your thread title to reflect the result.

Keep that Chablis on ice for now though.:wink:

 

Well done and kind regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mr Hat

 

Well done for standing up to these people. I have received a supposed N of A from them saying they had been assigned HSBC debt from Phoenix Recoveries and to send payment to Largo - who I had been paying from 2007 and had settled a F and F in 2010 on an unenforceable debt. Have sent CCA's again to both Arrow and Largo and repeated above. Anyway again, well done for fighting your corner and good luck with the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks Andy and Pixie. As Andy says, Le Chablis is on ice for now, will wait for confirmations to arrive and appeal time to expire. Happy that we have got this far :-)

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmmm, spoke to the court to chase things up and spoke to a more clued up sounding member of staff. The follwoing seems apparent1. The Claimant's slaim has been struck out. The order was an 'unless order' and said that the case would be struck out without further direction. The AQ has not been filed and it would have shown on the system by now if they had submitted on thime. I never received the unless order so have asked for a copy for my files.2. I can now write to the judge to claim costs as per the order - *****question for you guys - does this need to be via an application?***** 3. My counterclaim is still live and the reason I didn't get a seperate AQ for this is because they have not submitted a defence. I asked if I could then request judgement in my favour for this and she said that I should write to the judge. - *****again, would this be another application, so two seperate applications?*****So....what do you think? The lady said it was very strange as they had solicitors acting for them and they should have filed their AQ. I think the Sols passed the file back to Arrow but never notified me or the court and that this is a key reason for the radio silence.How would you play this and in what order?

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for no paragraphs! I did put them in but my work pc is playing up. Will edit later

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

One application is the way to go, not that I think you should have to, considering the Claimants behaviour in this claim with further expense to yourself.On receipt of the Unless order make application for Judgment and Costs.

 

" The order was an 'unless order' and said that the case would be struck out without further direction. "

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers. Would you bother asking for judgement for the cc or just the original claim for now Andy?

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can only request judgment for your CC as they have not responded with any defence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if I'm being a little thick Andy - but is that a 'yes' i should ask for judgment for my CC? Or would that complicate things? I've been at work all day and brain is a little frazzled so will give it some thought and come back later with a clear mind! :-)

CAG has helped me so much since I joined. Based on what I have learnt from others on here and my own experiences, I try to chip in and help others from time to time. I am not an expert and give my opinion only. Always check with the more experienced CAG members before making important decisions.

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...