Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help just lost in court to CL Finance/Howard Cohen


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4638 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Oh dear, I wish I could help you further but I'm afraid I'm not a great expert.From the documents you have posted it looks to me like a Tomlin Order was in place which would have dicatated your monthly payments. From the application HC are making, they appear to be suggesting that you have not kept up with the payments under the Tomlin Order, which I think is why you are having the hearing today. Is that correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi CM yes that is correct but I did not actually receive any court papers and if you see on the order there are no signatures, they managed to get a payment from me over the phone through constant hasseling. Have I done wrong by paying them some money ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that generally orders from the Court itself aren't signed, however, the Tomlin Order (or consent order) should have been signed by both yourself and the claimaint or the claimant's representative. A fully signed copy of the order should then have been sent to you by the court. we need to see a copy of the actual Tomlin Order you signed please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't quite understand how the court are referring to a Tomlin Order when you haven't signed anything?? Even if the documentation was sent to an old address the Tomlin Order couldn't have been approved without your signing it!How did your telephone hearing go? What was raised by the claimant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well CM what is the point ??? I sent a CCA req, a formal request pursuant to s.77 of the consumer credit act and a formal notice of account in dispute and still CL finance and Howard Cohen have WON. Now I just feel like I have been treated so unfairly and Im gutted. Thanks for looking into things for me:evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just lost my battle with CL Finance/Howard Cohen stitched up to pay joint loan by myself.

I have sent numerous request for CCA and formal req for information pursuant to s.77 and also a formal notice of account in dispute. They have sent me a letter saying they do not have it but still WON in court today. I dont get it PLEASE HELP

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought somebody could be nailed for stating that you signed a Tomlin Order when you didn't. Alas, I am not the person who can assist in appeals and so on, but I have flagged your thread so hopefully someone with the necessary experience will come and have a look shortly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sleepy, can you go through why you lost, I am intrigued. You say in your previous thread that CL Finance made an application to the court as you had failed to maintain payments on a tomlin order. Did they produce that tomlin order in court. As far as you were aware you did not sign any tomlin order. This is really confusing me. What has the judge ordered you to do now.

 

HH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi HH, I am just as confused, they said there was a signed Tomlin order with the court I did not know as I was not sent any of the paperwork before court except the letters I have put on here. The only thing I can remember signing is a direct debit mandate with them. The judge said they had paperwork there saying I had admitted to an amount of money owing, but what I have just been ordered to pay is double that and more. I requested release of any info they hold on me in Oct last year and have only recieved there letter saying they did not hold the paperwork I was asking for on site but they were in the process of retrieving a copy for me. They confimed in that letter that while my request was outstanding enforcement action would not be taken against me. HUH Then all I have recieved is my court date yesterday and on that I have lost. I was not able to defend what they were saying about me as I did not have the paperwork that the judge and Howard Cohens were referring too.???? HELP

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the looks of your thread you already have a judgment against you for payment by instalments. Is this correct. I cant see why the claimants would need a tomlin order if they have judgment. You need to get a copy of that from the court office.

 

You say you did not receive the original court papers as you had moved but you did receive the judgment ordering you to pay by instalments. Did you speak to the court about this.

 

Can anyone else help here I am totally confused.

 

From what I can gather, original court papers never received because OP had moved but does receive judgment to pay by instalments. OP ignores this and keeps pressing for original paperwork which in my opinion was too late as judgment already received.

 

Nothing happens for a couple of months and then obviously Howard Cohen apply for what ? I dont know really know as they already have judgment. OP has a telephone hearing in which the judge orders the OP to pay by instalments why - there is already an instalment order in place.

 

I think that is the gist of it.

 

OP can I ask why did you not query the original judgment if you have not received the original court papers.

 

Sorry to ask questions but I find this totally confusing

 

HH

 

HH

Edited by hammyhound
Link to post
Share on other sites

By the looks of your thread you already have a judgment against you for payment by instalments. Is this correct. I cant see why the claimants would need a tomlin order if they have judgment. You need to get a copy of that from the court office.

 

You say you did not receive the original court papers as you had moved but you did receive the judgment ordering you to pay by instalments. Did you speak to the court about this.

 

Can anyone else help here I am totally confused.

 

From what I can gather, original court papers never received because OP had moved but does receive judgment to pay by instalments. OP ignores this and keeps pressing for original paperwork which in my opinion was too late as judgment already received.

 

Nothing happens for a couple of months and then obviously Howard Cohen apply for what ? I dont know really know as they already have judgment. OP has a telephone hearing in which the judge orders the OP to pay by instalments why - there is already an instalment order in place.

 

I think that is the gist of it.

 

OP can I ask why did you not query the original judgment if you have not received the original court papers.

 

Sorry to ask questions but I find this totally confusing

 

HH

 

HH

 

 

We need to see the Tomlin Order/Consent Order as I imagine that it says that the claim be stayed etc and no judgment entered whilst the OP is paying £XX.XX.

 

Once the OP breached Tomlin Order/Consent Order the Claimant had to apply to lift the stay and enter judgment.

 

The Court have lifted the stay and entered judgment so the OP now has a CCJ for £XX.XX per month.

 

If the OP now defaults on the CCJ the Claimant can enforce, whereas they couldn't before as there was no CCJ to enforce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Gannymede. I was totally confused. I thought the OP said they had received an order to pay so much a month but ignored it. I didn't realise it was the tomlin order I thought it was judgment.

 

Op get to the court office and get a copy of the Tomlin Order and post on here.

 

This is crucial.

 

HH

Link to post
Share on other sites

This was all I received before yesterdays hearing Many Thanks for taking a look for me

 

 

No wonder the DJ knock back the Claimant's application, that is not the correct way to lift the stay and enter judgment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...