Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Paul v Accord


paulpb123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4656 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sometimes walking away is harder than staying to fight, your doing the right thing Paul.

 

Thank you for all your help and advice and Good luck!

09.12.2006 B&W LBA sent

 

22.11.2006 B&W prelim letter sent asking £5500.32

 

23.11.2006 TMB S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 175
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Zoot, Gizmo, Dolly, Alisonf, Ellielou, Jmorgan, MF, UK, Biffa, Les, Charbyd (and anyone I've forgotten),

Accord have agreed to no costs if we withdraw the claim. Thank you all, my lovelies, for all your help. I still think this forum is the friendliest. When I get B/Card and N/West to cough up I'll send money to you Jmorgan and MF and Charbydis. Could you open Paypal accounts? All good wishes,

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing ventured nothing gained eh Paul?

I think you've made the right decision.

Glad you've managed to get out of it without having to foot thier costs.

Halifax 1

WON - £1,355.49 21/07/06

MINT

WON - £273.81 14/09/06

First Direct

WON - £913.50 01/09/06

Capital One

WON - £130.13 03/11/06

Halifax 2

WON - £188.03 01/12/06

 

Kensington Mortgages ERC

MCOL for £6,204.39 Discontinued

Halifax Mortgage Admin fee

WON - £10.00

Direct Line Mortgage Redemption Fee

WON - £99.00

Halifax 3

MCOL for £109.01 reg 07/03/07

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/redemptionfees/

Please sign this petition x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks as usual to everyone for the great support here. Although Accord were very quick to send the Consent Order regarding no costs and the claim being withdrawn...we have not signed anything yet. I'm getting the impression, from what Zoot has said on a few threads, that these ERC cases are NOT without merit after all. We're very reluctant to pull out. Zoot, I know you've been working hard on the ERC question and looking at case histories etc. So, is it still the advice that we should just pull out? Or are things changing?

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its always going to be too risky in Fast Track Paul.

 

Much will come down to the circumstances of individual cases, how well you can argue your case and how sympathetic the judge is. The judge is always going to be mindful of the implications of a win so it may be that no matter how forceful the arguments the judge will say no.

 

Had it been small claims I would love to tell you to carry on and ultimately the decision is yours. But if it was me I wouldn't continue.

 

All the best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mochamoo,

We tried negotiating but by that time it was too late and they'd obviously got wind. They said Accord are not prepared to negotiate. So we sent a simple email to their solicitors saying we'd withdraw the claim on the understanding that we would not incur any of their costs. They agreed and sent us a Consent Order to sign and send to the court. It had 2 conditions: 1) The claim is herewith dismissed 2) Each party to bear their own costs.

Better times to come!

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paul,

 

Like all of us who spent DAYS not hours working on these cases, we've not lost anything - this is just the beginning of the road to change.

 

Thank you for your help previously - by sticking together, we'll make the Mortgage companies sit up and listen over time.

 

:D

--------------------------------------------------------------

HSBC

Settled in FULL on 8/8/06 - £3619.53

:D

CAPITAL ONE

Settled in Full on 6/9/06 - £84.76

:D

ABBEY NATIONAL (Old N&P Mortgage)

Settled In Full on 2/3/07 - £307.13

:D

SPML

*Court Case Withdrawn - family illness*

MORTGAGES PLC

*Court Case Withdrawn - family illness*

Link to post
Share on other sites

We will regroup and fight again soon. We have learnt a lot from the other cases.

 

Uk

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paul

 

I'm another victim of Accord with an ERC of £7344, Arrangement Fee of £695 and an Admin Fee of £50. Do you think there a chance of getting any of this back?

4/10/06 - Claim settled in full+costs+interest.

6/10/06 - court hearing date.

Allocation questionaire returned to the court-18/7/06 deadline 25/7/06

Allocation Questionaire rec'd dated- 6/7/06

Acknowledgment of Service rec'd full defence- 15/6/06

Reply from solicitors want more info.-14/6/06

Money claim filed £1653 - 7/6/06

Reply rec'd to LBA-27/5/06

LBA sent - 19/5/06

Reply from LLoyds TSB a big fat NO - 12/5/06

1st request for payment sent - 09/05/06

Statements Rec'd - 21/4/06

Data Protection Act request sent to Lloyds - 22/3/06

previously known as VIKKI ARDA

 

Forum InfoContact

Link to post
Share on other sites

waiting is the name of the game ....but it is only a matter of time.

We owe such a lot to Morgy, Marroonfox, et al for the opportunity to forge a secure path at their expense.

 

Can't wait for pay back time...

 

lel

2006 RatNest - Personal a/c:

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim, Oct Settled in full £7,000

 

2006 RatNest - Ltd Co a/c

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim, Oct Settled in full £8,000

 

2006 RatNest - Hub's a/c

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim,Sept Settled in full £1,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks, just hought I would let you know that I spoke with a District Judge today about ERC and guess what it's happened to him to. He said how can they possibly justify these charges. He said the matter seriously needs looking into from a legal point of view. He said if a case is brought before him he would certainly not rule in the favour of the mortgage comapny. He said he is certain other Judges feel the same as he is sure a lot of them like him have or want to pay off thier mortages early. He advised me to read up on this and prepare my case thoroughly, he the the Financial Times have articles relating to this subject on the internet. Incidentally he is looking at getting his daughters Bank charges back. I think they may pay up quickly with letters signed in the name of

Judge ---- . I can't mention his name or location for obvious reasons.

But hell I think this is good news.

4/10/06 - Claim settled in full+costs+interest.

6/10/06 - court hearing date.

Allocation questionaire returned to the court-18/7/06 deadline 25/7/06

Allocation Questionaire rec'd dated- 6/7/06

Acknowledgment of Service rec'd full defence- 15/6/06

Reply from solicitors want more info.-14/6/06

Money claim filed £1653 - 7/6/06

Reply rec'd to LBA-27/5/06

LBA sent - 19/5/06

Reply from LLoyds TSB a big fat NO - 12/5/06

1st request for payment sent - 09/05/06

Statements Rec'd - 21/4/06

Data Protection Act request sent to Lloyds - 22/3/06

previously known as VIKKI ARDA

 

Forum InfoContact

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Paul

 

Glad you managed to withdraw without getting stung for costs. I was waiting on your result before going in with daughter's £6k as mentioned earlier in your thread. I take it that you will review your position in the future and have a another go if possible.

 

If it helps I have a letter from Accord that states:-

 

"The Early Repayment Charge is a penalty for redeeming the mortgage account whilst been (sic) on the x.xx% Fixed until [date] which you were on. The Early Repayment Charges for the above product were worked out at 5% of the total balance outstanding."

 

They have stated it was a penalty. Haven't started a claim for ERC but did question their maths which is what generated this response.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

IANAL - Opinions offered are just my personal views and are not guaranteed to be correct. I have been known to be wrong (once or twice).

Claims in progress against:

Eldest - First Direct - Part Offer received - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/first-direct/79619-eldest-fd.html

Eldest - Halifax - Cheque Received Full amount - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/66254-here-we-go-eldest.html

Youngest - Halifax x 3 - Request for refund sent - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/79617-youngest-halifax.html

Eldest - unnamed Mortgage Provider for Charges and incorrect maths.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Half Ax I,

The way I see it is that we need to find a way around the argument that there was no breach of contract. At the moment, as far as I can see, when we redeem early, this is not a breach but merely the exercising of a right under the terms of the contract. It clearly states in our contract with Accord that we CAN redeem early BUT there will be a charge of 6% in yr 1 and so on. It certainly seems very unfair and none of the mortgage companies have been prepared to justify these charges. But they don't need to...yet. And even if Accord are calling it a penalty, it makes no difference unless there has been a breach. I still feel optimistic that things are going to change. What I don't understand is why the OFT are getting tough on mortgage exit fees (which are a few hundred pounds) and ignoring ERCs (which are, as we all know, thousands). Let's hope they get on the case. Until something changes the wait goes on...It might help if everyone signs the petition in Zoot's sig.

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Good evening,

 

Sorry if I hijack this post. But I think is most relevant to post here with all the experts around!

 

We are going to pay Accord an £5900 ERC on Friday. We only have 2 months on the deal left. We have tried everything from porting the mortgage to moving it to another property but all Accord see is an easy £6k.

 

Do you think it could work if offer to pay them all the interest till the deal ends in return for my ERC? The 2months interest will be around £1000 and I think that will be a fair deal? Or could I take them to the small claim court for £5900 minus the interest which will make bring total under £5k?

 

Thanks for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Koos

 

You would be better starting your own thread under the http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mortgage-companies/ forum. Why not copy & paste your question into a new one and we can reply there. Send me a PM when you have your own thread and I will visit. I'm sure Paul will too.

 

S

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

IANAL - Opinions offered are just my personal views and are not guaranteed to be correct. I have been known to be wrong (once or twice).

Claims in progress against:

Eldest - First Direct - Part Offer received - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/first-direct/79619-eldest-fd.html

Eldest - Halifax - Cheque Received Full amount - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/66254-here-we-go-eldest.html

Youngest - Halifax x 3 - Request for refund sent - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/79617-youngest-halifax.html

Eldest - unnamed Mortgage Provider for Charges and incorrect maths.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...