Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lloyds tsb debt - every dca has had this alleged debt - when will it stop! - help


tc5712
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2812 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

To cut a very long story short I have an alleged outstanding personal loan from LloydsTSB.

Was passed to Moorcroft Aug 2010.

CCA request sent, they couldn't get one so default of CCA sent Sept 2010.

Oct 2010 recieved notice from Moorcroft CCA unavailable.

Dec 2010 contacted by Apex, sent account in dispute letter.

Jan 2011 Apex accepted account was in dispute and went away.

Now just a few days ago (May 2011) I get a letter from Robinson Day Ltd requesting full payment.

Should I send account in dispute letter again?

Many thanks in advance,

TC

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 191
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

In a nutshell, yes

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who currently owns the account Lloyds? or did they sell it on?

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No DCA I have dealt with so far has been willing to divulge that specificly.

 

But they do always say 'we are acting on behalf of LloydsTSB'?

 

Not sure if that makes it any clearer or they are BSing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

look at your cra file

that will tell you who owns it

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, With Dx your CRA should shed some light.

 

Dx - Sorry for my rude word in my other post about paypal, i didn't realize yourself or another mod had edited, thought it had be filtered out by word filters and the note was automatically put their because id only just posted it like 5 secs before the words appeared. You were quick i give you that. lol

Please note that this advice is given informally, without liability and without prejudice. Always seek the advice of an insured qualified professional. All my legal and nonlegal knowledge comes from either here (CAG),my own personal research and experience and/or as the result of necessity as an Employer and Businessman.

 

By using my advice in any form, you agreed to waive all rights to hold myself or any persons representing myself of any liability.

 

If you PM me, make sure to include a link to your thread as I don't give out advice in private. All PMs that are sent in missuse (including but not limited to phinishing, spam) of the PM application and/or PMs that are threatening or abusive will be reported to the Site Team and if necessary to the police and/or relevant Authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wasn't me!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If their letters say they are acting on behalf of their clients, then LTSB will still own it, your CRF will/should show you the name of the circus outfit whose been given the lemon to hold.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If their letters say they are acting on behalf of their clients, then LTSB will still own it, your CRF will/should show you the name of the circus outfit whose been given the lemon to hold.

 

Have already sent the account in dispute letter and was delivered on 6/5/11.

 

Is it still worth getting hold of the CRF before they respond?

 

TIA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well now you know, your next task will be to cancel your free trial in time before they take your money!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well now you know, your next task will be to cancel your free trial in time before they take your money!

 

Yep, done that.

 

So just sit tight and wait for a response from Robinson Day then?

 

TIA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes wait for robbersway to grace you with their presence. Then continue to ignore their puerile letters, just file them away and make a new complaint each and every time they contact you.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got this letter today from Robinson Way.

 

No acknowledgment of my ‘Serious account in dispute’ letter whatsoever!

 

I know they received it as I sent it recorded and was signed for on the 5/5/11.

 

I’m quite happy to ignore this latest letter but is there something else I should send as they have blatantly ignored the letter I sent them?

 

TIA

 

TC

RD120511 edit.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote the OFT 664 debt collection guidance sheet titled "Final guidance on unfair business practices"

 

Physical / Psychological harrassment -

 

2.6

h. ignoring and / or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment

Link to post
Share on other sites

YOUR ADDRESS

 

 

 

DATE

 

THEIR REFERENCE

 

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Thank you for your recent letter(s) dated,……………………………. The contents of which have been noted.

 

On the (date of letter) I sent a letter to your company informing you that this account is in dispute.

 

You received this letter on the (date of recorded confirmation) but have since commenced collection activity against myself regarding this matter despite the fact that I have made quite clear that this account is in dispute.

 

I would like to take this opportunity to draw your attention to the CPUTR 2008 and the OFT guidelines on debt collection which state under the title Deceptive and / or unfair methods:

 

Examples of unfair practices are as follows – 2.8

 

(i)- ‘failing to investigate and / or provide details as appropriate, when a debt is queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wrongfully pursued.’

 

(k)- ‘not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt.’

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

 

You have 21 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I look forward to hearing from you. I request that all contact should be made in writing only and to the address above. I have no wish to correspond by telephone or via personal visits and as such any attempt to contact me by either of these methods shall be deemed as harassment and reported to the appropriate regulatory authorities.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

Printed Name

Edited by bernardski
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Your welcome, i just wish Dx or BB were online as they are very clued up on all this, This is part of the Account in dispute letter i sent recently but as yet have heard nothing back so hopefully that means it relays to them that you wont put up with being bullied anymore!!

 

Any mods online available to offer any advice here please?

 

B

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again bernardski, made a few minor edits to reflect my individual situation. Unless I hear any different this will be winging it's way off tomorrow:

 

 

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

Thank you for your recent letter dated xxxxxx The contents of which have been noted.

 

On the xxxxxx I sent a letter to your company informing you that this account is in dispute.

 

You signed for this letter on the xxxxxx but have since continued collection activity against myself regarding this matter despite the fact that I have made it quite clear that this account is in dispute.

 

I would like to take this opportunity to draw your attention to the CPUTR act 2008 and the OFT guidelines on debt collection which state under the title ‘Deceptive and/or unfair methods’:

 

Examples of unfair practices are as follows – 2.8

 

(i)- ‘failing to investigate and / or provide details as appropriate, when a debt is queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wrongfully pursued.’

 

(k)- ‘not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt.’

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

 

You have 21 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I look forward to hearing from you. I furthermore request that all contact should be made in writing and only to the address above. I have no wish to correspond by telephone or via personal visits and as such any attempt to contact me by either of these methods shall be deemed as harassment and reported to the appropriate regulatory authorities.

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO I would simply ignore that letter robbersway sent, it is simply the computer printing off the next threatogramme in it's weekly cycle, there will have been NO human input to that apart from the postie pushing it through your letterbox.

 

They have received your letter disputing the account, they just failed to tell the computer to stop sending out it's petty deforestation, if they persist in a few weeks of receiving your dispute letter, then send them this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?425-Letter-to-solicitors-threatening-legal-action-in-default-of-agreement-request

 

But it will need editing to suit, where it refers to 'your client' enter robbersway' name.

Alternatively ignore them completely and just continue making complaints about them to the OFT, TS, FOS, your local MP and the Media.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...