Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with early settlement please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4725 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please help me!!!!!!

 

I have a current car loan with welcome, no PPI. However I want to settle my agreement with them. They say that my outstanding balance is £4242. I am currently 38 monthly payments into a 60 month payment plan. They offered me a settlement of £4027. Is this a joke?????? I am paying 21 months in advance and all they want to give me is this measly amount off.

 

Anyway I have spoken to local branch, complaints dept an they are all saying no chance of reducing this figure any further.

 

What else can I do????

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have moved your post to its own thread as you have posted on quite an old thread.

 

Can you tell me what your monthly payment is, please, so that I can check the statutory rebate.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The details are as follows

Total loan - £12,120.00

Total repayments made to date. 39 payments of £202.00 = £7878

 

Total they say outstanding £4242.00.

 

Total they are willing to settle on is £4026.22

 

Apr charged at 7.6%

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked for a sttlement figure on my car loan , i owe £5046 and they offered me.......£5046

 

will not take a penny less as have had a directive from up high to get the maximum

 

bloody cheek when questioned further as to why other creditors have taken offers he just replied that they were unsecured loans not car loans??????? Does that make any sense to anyone else?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are effectively paying off the loan early then there is a statutory rebate they have to apply. I can work out what it is if you give me the original loan amount, the monthly repayments, how many there were and how many you have made

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Those figures don't stack up - 60*202 = 12120 - there is no interest, ie the APR is 0% (the same applies to numbers sickofwelcome gave me)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was the total loan amount including any charges, interest, insurances and anything else they scammed

Me out of.

 

My agreement says the following -

Total amount of credit for the goods £8250

Amount of credit for the insurances £850

Amount of credit for goods and insurances £9100

Amount for re financing £1000

 

Total £10100

 

Duration of agreement 60 months

 

Total amount payable for goods £9900 (this is apparently the cost of £8250 from above and another £1650 which states charge for credit or goods)

 

Total amount payable for the insurances £1020 ( this is the £850 figure from above and a further £170 which states charge for credit for insurances)

 

Total amount payable for re financing £1200 ( this is the £1000 charge from above with an additional £200 for charge for credit for re financing)

 

There is a 7.6% APR on this

 

There is also a statement below that states the following -

Interest, calculated on the amount if credit and acceptance fee outstanding from time to time throughout the duration of the agreement, taking into account the payments above, makes up the finance charges for goods and the charges for credit for the insurance and re financing, which will be paid by you for part of each payment.

 

If it's easier I can email you a copy of this and you can see for yourself as it's a bit complicated and what I have realised a complete [problem] and rip off. Basically I feel barging me for things and adding on costs left right and centre.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it was a rewrite of a car loan and was put on 0%, does that matter?
It deosn't matter but it means you are not entited to any rebate (of ineterest - for obvious reasons)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Steven - does this include me too?

 

Surly there is interest, they are not going to just give you it for nothing. They have hidden it by the seems of things. What about the paragraph at te bottom of the agreement saying about the interest. The one I added above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...