Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Recommended Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm on a Covid run all this week, for some reason I thought it would be quite easy, starts in St Andrews then Dundee, Perth, Stirling, Cumbernauld then Glasgow over 200 miles. I drop of empty Test boxes and collect the ones that are ready to go to the Labs for results.   Every Testing Station today said they had not been very busy over the weekend, it was quite nice weather over the weekend which is more than likely the reason for the lack of numbers.
    • Credit file: One account(showing balance of £0 due) for main line showing missed payments from December 2020 (when the contract itself was terminated in August 2020). One account(showing loan of £204 due) for second line showing as being in default since November 2020. As a result of these my credit score has gone down-this is due directly to these two accounts which showed on my credit report as a 'negative factor'   Credit disadvantage: When my Virgin contract ended, I attempted to take up a new contract with another company. I was prevented from doing so at Vodafone as they required a deposit of £150, plus I would not be entitled to the free handset, but would have had to pay £179 for it and the monthly payments would be increasd. I was able to take out a handset at Three, but again instead of being entitled to it free, I had to pay £189 for it.   I will check carefully to estimate the amount of time involved-I have queries going back to October 2019 attempting to deal with this.   I have also received from Virgin another letter giving me the password to unlock the files they sent me(shame it doesn't actually work) and a second email again confirming they will erase my data unless they have to keep it.   I'm wondering if they're planning to use that email as their response for the ICO where he gave them until March 11 to either tell me what they are going to do to put things right or explain why they believe they have met their data protection obligations'?      
    • “We want to get Amigo back to life again” – CEO’s statement as lender posts £87m loss View the full article
    • My case is adjourned to this Month. I'm about to send out my Supplementary Witness Statement. Could someone please check if the following is efficient? My court cost is now over £1000 as it was adjourned 3 times  Thanks!   Supplementary Witness Statement to address the new case exhibits introduced at the hearing on 10 November 2020   VCS v Ward  1.       This case is often quoted by the claimant as assisting their case. However in this instance it actually assists mine. It is contended that the act of stopping a vehicle does not amount to parking. This predatory operation pays no regard to the byelaws at all. It is likely that this Claimant may try to rely upon two 'trophy case' wins, namely VCS v Crutchley and/or VCS v Ward, neither of which were at an Airport location. Both involve flawed reasoning and the Courts were wrongly steered by this Claimant's representative; there are worrying errors in law within those cases, such as an irrelevant reliance upon the completely different Supreme Court case. These are certainly not the persuasive decisions that this Claimant may suggest.  Semark-Jullien Case  2.       Whilst it is known that another case that was struck out on the same basis was appealed to Salisbury Court (the Semark-Jullien case), the parking industry did not get any finding one way or the other about the illegality of adding the same costs twice. The Appeal Judge merely pointed out that he felt that insufficient information was known about the Semark-Jullien facts of the case (the Defendant had not engaged with the process and no evidence was in play, unlike in the Crosby case) and so the Judge listed it for a hearing and felt that case (alone) should not have been summarily struck out due to a lack of any facts and evidence.  3.       The Judge at Salisbury correctly identified as an aside, that costs were not added in the Beavis case. That is because this had already been addressed in ParkingEye's earlier claim, the pre-Beavis High Court (endorsed by the Court of Appeal) case ParkingEye v Somerfield  a. (ref para 419): https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2011/4023.html  ''It seems to me that, in the present case, it would be difficult for ParkingEye to justify, as against any motorist, a claim for payment of the enhanced sum of £135 if the motorist took the point that the additional £60 over and above the original figure of £75 constituted a penalty. It might be possible for ParkingEye to show that the additional administrative costs involved were substantial, though I very much doubt whether they would be able to justify this very large increase on that basis. On the face of it, it seems to me that the predominant contractual function of this additional payment must have been to deter the motorist from breaking his contractual obligation to pay the basic charge of £75 within the time specified, rather than to compensate ParkingEye for late payment. Applying the formula adopted by Colman J. in the Lordsvale case, therefore, the additional £60 would appear to be penal in nature; and it is well established that, in those circumstances, it cannot be recovered, though the other party would have at least a theoretical right to damages for breach of the primary obligation.''  
    • I'm ready to reject Hermes offer and issue the letter before claim. I've registered on the MCOL website and filled in my claim with the below particulars.   Should I tick the box to send the particulars directly to the defendant?   Should I also tick the box for the right to claim interest. If so do what date would I put for when the money became owed,  what is daily rate of interest up to the date of judgment?    Thanks again      
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Interesting Development In Lowell/Vanquis Debacle


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3583 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Greets Caggers!

 

Getting repeated phone calls from these vermin and then the phone goes dead.

 

The first number was 0113 ?????? and all the rest have been PRIVATE ID withheld.

 

Can anyone tell me what number to add to my block list?

 

Thanks!

 

RI

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Cartaphilus
Getting repeated phone callslink3.gif from these vermin and then the phone goes dead.

 

If you are sure it's them, you may already know this but what they are doing is silent calls which also comes under harassment. In any other instance or circumstance it would be treated as such anyway. Particularly where witholding their number and doing it is concerned as well. Always thought they weren't allowed to phone debtors from a witheld number but there again ... As it's unfair means of contacting you without disclosing who they are or using a normally recognizable number. Maybe they need reminding of this via the proper channels. ;)

 

Anyway, what I am saying is report them for this. A very well known creditor was fined a while ago (on two occasions) for making a very high volume of calls exactly like yours to people in debt. Same MO. In some cases dozens of calls were made per day. Naturally, it all got blamed on the autodialler. They still do it, though, even after the slap on the wrists. Nothing new there, then.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It maybe this number: 0113 308 6044

 

Its probably an autodialer, and assists telemarketing companies by being able to automatically call substantial databases of telephone numbers letting the next available sales agent to pick up their next call without having to actually dial the phone number on their own. Maybe why its dead as the deadbeat on the other end has gone for a break.

Some useful links.

FAQ's

Making Posts

Letter Template Library

Bank Contact Details

AQ Guide to Completion

Court Fees

Data Protection non Compliance

Witness Statements for Court Bundle

Banking Code Website

Limitations Act

Fast Track Costs

A-Z Index

Mis-Claim Tutorial

Step By Step Instructions

 

Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs-The Titanic by professionals.

 

Please click my scales if you find my advice helpful !

 

If your claim is successful, please donate 5% so that it can continue to help others.

 

Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, please seek qualified professional legal Help.

 

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

 

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

YOU CAN NOW COMPLAIN TO THE OFT ABOUT THEIR CONDUCT UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION FROM UNFAIR TRADING REGULATIONS 2008.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowells autodialler dials upwards of a hundred numbers at a time. If anyone is foolish enough to answer them then the call is passed to one of their free call centre monkeys. If however all highly skilled professional sympathetic operators are busy helping other alleged debtors then you receive the dead line.

 

They have numerous numbers available including 0800 numbers and the only effective way of blocking them is by the purchase of a truecall telephone answering system

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Lowell CRT

Hi RoyalIrish

 

I have just seen your post about Lowell and am very sorry to learn of the difficulties you have experienced with regards to phone calls you are receiving.

 

We would like the opportunity to deal with your concerns through our dedicated Complaints Resolution Team. The Complaints Resolution Team is entirely independent to our Collections Department. Our sole aim is to deal with customer’s specific concerns.

 

We appreciate you may have some reservations about contacting us, but please let me assure you we are here to help.

 

To ensure your enquiry reaches one of our trained Complaints Resolution Officers, please use our direct email [email protected].

 

As soon as we hear from you we will be able to place your account on hold, stopping any collections activity, whilst we deal with your enquiry.

 

 

We hope to be in contact with you soon.

 

 

 

James

 

Lowell Complaints Resolution Team

Link to post
Share on other sites

James

 

I thought you would have worked out by now that you are not welcome here. Until your company learns to behave in a civilised way, I suggest that you go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi RoyalIrish

 

I have just seen your post about Lowell and am very sorry to learn of the difficulties you have experienced with regards to phone calls you are receiving. difficulties?:mad::mad::mad:

 

We would like the opportunity to deal with your concerns through our dedicated Complaints Resolution Team. The Complaints Resolution Team is entirely independent to our Collections Department. Our sole aim is to deal with customer’s specific concerns. not concerns.

 

We appreciate you may have some reservations about contacting us, but please let me assure you we are here to help.

 

To ensure your enquiry reaches one of our trained Complaints Resolution Officers, please use our direct email [email protected].

 

As soon as we hear from you we will be able to place your account on hold, stopping any collections activity, whilst we deal with your enquiry.

 

 

We hope to be in contact with you soon.

 

 

 

James

 

Lowell Complaints Resolution Team

 

6th post and STILL not got the message.

6th post and STILL NO HELP:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:

 

YOU CLAIM

that you can not openly post on the forum,that you need a reference to look into a complaint(sorry enquiry)WHY?

WHY can you not comment?

 

I have a complaint for you the one that you ignored on another post.

do you still choose to not comment.

this cagger has nothing to hide and has given me her permission to act on her behalf.

 

We are ready to post her complaint in full again on here.

will you answer it if we supply the reference?

 

will you show us how dedicated you are?

how concerned you are?

or continue to skulk in the background for another few weeks?

 

valid even if not understood by you,because it will be read and ignored will it not.

 

samandra

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER.

 

SO PROUD OF MY AVATAR,THAT TOOK ME WEEKS TO WORK OUT HOW TO GET ONE.:lol:

 

PLZ CLICK MY SCALES IF YOU LIKE WHAT I SAY.

OR IF I HAVE HELPED IN ANY WAY.:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

James I suggest you answer sone of the question put to you about the outfit you work for before offering '"help" to anyone else. For instance why do Lowells need to use three different sets of headed paper to chase people for the same debt. Lowell Financial, Red Debt and the hilarious Hampton Legal. What is the point if not designed to intimidate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

james seems to have logged off.

maybe he is manning the phone line today?

 

or one of the 5 guests:D

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER.

 

SO PROUD OF MY AVATAR,THAT TOOK ME WEEKS TO WORK OUT HOW TO GET ONE.:lol:

 

PLZ CLICK MY SCALES IF YOU LIKE WHAT I SAY.

OR IF I HAVE HELPED IN ANY WAY.:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Lowell CRT

Hi Sam614

 

We will be more than happy to investigate the complaint, if you send me the full details to the attached email address and then I can provide a specific response.

[email protected]

 

Thanks.

 

James

 

Lowell Complaints Resolution Team

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER.

 

SO PROUD OF MY AVATAR,THAT TOOK ME WEEKS TO WORK OUT HOW TO GET ONE.:lol:

 

PLZ CLICK MY SCALES IF YOU LIKE WHAT I SAY.

OR IF I HAVE HELPED IN ANY WAY.:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is he still on here touting for business?

 

Ignore him, Lowlifes have zero interest in any complaints, the people you should be making a complaint to is Consumer Direct, who pass on the details of your complaint to the OFT and TS, Lowlifes must be getting really desperate, absolutely pathetic.

 

Word of the day is 'Plonker'.

Courtesy of Cerburusalert

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Greets Caggers!

 

Getting repeated phone calls from these vermin and then the phone goes dead.

 

The first number was 0113 ?????? and all the rest have been PRIVATE ID withheld.

 

Can anyone tell me what number to add to my block list?

 

Thanks!

 

RI

 

Lowell CRT are not very good at their jobs, are they?

 

RoyalIrish, only wanted their telephone numbers, in order to block them!

 

Here are some:

0844 844 4716;

0844 844 3742;

0844 844 4717;

0844 844 4730;

0113 308 6044;

0845 300 9416.

 

AC

X

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant AC, all added to my TrueCall...:D

C'mon lowlifes, you must have bought my un-enforceable debt by now?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like to poke the nest with my stick occasionally....:D

 

Does that sound wrong to you?:confused:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anthrax alert at debt collectors caused by box of doughnuts

 

Make sure you do not post anything which identifies you. Although we can remove certain things from the site unless it's done in a timely manner everything you post will appear in Google cache & we do not have any control over that.

 

Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

17 Port & Maritime Regiment RCT

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi RoyalIrish

 

I have just seen your post about Lowell and am very sorry to learn of the difficulties you have experienced with regards to phone calls you are receiving.

 

We would like the opportunity to deal with your concerns through our dedicated Complaints Resolution Team. The Complaints Resolution Team is entirely independent to our Collections Department. Our sole aim is to deal with customer’s specific concerns.

 

We appreciate you may have some reservations about contacting us, but please let me assure you we are here to help.

 

To ensure your enquiry reaches one of our trained Complaints Resolution Officers, please use our direct email [email protected].

 

As soon as we hear from you we will be able to place your account on hold, stopping any collections activity, whilst we deal with your enquiry.

 

 

We hope to be in contact with you soon.

 

 

 

James

 

Lowell Complaints Resolution Team

 

James!

 

Do one mate!

 

I know Lowell's and you are the **** of the earth!

 

Why are you calling me from a withheld number?

 

(I know it is you because I called you back see).

 

No amount of, 'please ring us, we are here to help you' crap is gonna change this!

 

You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear!

 

Thanks for the help guys!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a handy site for DCA 'phone no.s Fighting Debt

Anthrax alert at debt collectors caused by box of doughnuts

 

Make sure you do not post anything which identifies you. Although we can remove certain things from the site unless it's done in a timely manner everything you post will appear in Google cache & we do not have any control over that.

 

Vir prudens non contra ventum mingit

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

17 Port & Maritime Regiment RCT

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...