Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

#Employment Problems


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4748 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I was wondering if someone had any advice regarding my employment problems outlined below (short of consulting a solicitor)?

 

On the 3rd of March 2011 I was offered a permanent job as a Web Developer. I had also applied for another job (unrelated that mentioned FULL training). The same day that I had received the first job offer I contacted the other employer regarding the status of my application. I was informed that I would most likely be offered a "trial" by the end of the week. I proceeded to ask a number of questions regarding the job, specifically how long the trial would last (all communication by email). I was informed that the trial would be from 8th March 2011 to 8th April 2011 and "all being well between both parties" I would be offered a full time position after this.

 

I then accepted the trial (declining the other position, which the other company knew about). I proceeded to completed some training for the new position. On the 24th March 2011 I was informed that the "trial" was to be extended to the end of April 2011. Obviously I wasn't too please but I was willing to accept it (I did make my feelings known, in a diplomatic manner). I also specifically asked whether the trial would be extended further come the end of April, to which I was informed "The trial will not be in anyway extended beyond April 30th".

 

I then proceeded to work the days that I was scheduled to do (11 in total). After the 6th day of working I was informed by email that, after conversations with other members of staff that I had worked with the that they had received some "not so positive" comments but mostly positive and they are going to extent the trial to the end of May 2011. I then asked what these where and what I was told I didn't agree with at all, it appears as though they are making excuses to extend the trial and keep me hanging on. I then sent a reply stating this with examples on the 21st of April 2011 and I am still awaiting a reply. I was in no way informed of these "not so positive" comments when they occurred, nor was I informed that I wasn't performing as well as expected at the time so I assumed all was well.

 

I had been out of work for a few months so I am in a bit of debt and all this prolonging of the "trial" is causing me a lot of problems as I expected to be in full time employment from the 8th April and then the 30th April. A company vehicle was promised when full time employment is offered but during the "trial" I am expected to make travel arrangements (which involve travelling to numerous locations that could be up to 3 hours away (expenses paid in arrears)) thus delaying the offer of employment means me having to arrange transport as I don't own my own vehicle.

 

I have not signed or received a contract of employment but I have received a payslip for this months pay (having sent a p45)(including an employee number/being taxed etc so I must be on their PAYE scheme).

 

My question is, what, if anything, can I do? Just send a formal grievance or is there anything else I could do as they are basically taking the mick out of me? Since I haven't been given a formal employment contract (as it is casual, paid per day during the "trial"), would the answers to my questions that I previously been sent form the terms of my employment?

 

Obviously I don't want to rub them up the wrong way but I would like to know my rights.

 

Many thanks in advance.

 

Mr H (anonymous name for obvious reasons)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mr H and Welcome

 

Your rights, in short, are basically nil. I realise that this isn't what you want to hear, but it is a fact. A trial can be extended for as long as they want it to continue and providing that you are paid for any work that you do, there is not much more that you can do.

 

For what it is worth, I am inclined to agree that they are keeping you hanging on, and it sounds as though they are well aware that you will only start to accrue the most important employment rights, particularly to be able to take a case of Unfair Dismissal to an Employment Tribunal, once you have worked there for 12 months. I may be wrong, and I hope so, but this sounds like a classic case of a trial (or probationary period) being extended until just before a year's service has elapsed and then being told that you are not suitable after all.

 

You could indeed raise a grievance, which might tell you one way or the other exactly what their intentions are towards your continued employment, or you could just try and keep your head down until you have been there a year and keep under the radar, so to speak. Alternatively you could keep your options open and start to look at alternatives, perhaps where you might be better appreciated, but be warned that the 1 year rule rule (the Government intend to make this two years believe it or not!) will apply wherever you go, and in the current economic climate, no one place is much safer than another.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the prompt reply Sidewinder.

 

I was afraid that would be the case. I have read other cases of probationary periods and feared that my situation would be the same.

 

The thing that annoys me is that I have been promised that the extension(s) would not occur and it has due to some small (and rather pathetic) reasons during, only, the first 6 days of working there. But as you say they are under no obligation to employ me or not extend the trial, I just thought that as I was on their payroll I might be entitled to some protection.

 

On another note (as I am an employee now and not a contractor), would I be entitled to any paid holiday (will work 11 days in April as an employee)? How is it worked out?

 

I have already started looking elsewhere, but I have not had much look recently so I want to keep hold of this probationary work just to see me by.

 

I know that I am perfect for the job (as said by an employee and numerous of the companies clients and partners) and I would be a great asset to the company (which I am sure they know as I can offer web/software development (which they are look at) which would cost them considerably more compared to the salary they are offering! as well as having a lot of experience of the products/services that they sell). If I had an alternative source of income then I would give them an ultimatum (offer me a contract of I walk!) but sadly I don't.

 

I will see what they come back with in response to my latest email pleading my case and then decide on whether to lodge a grievance (but I imagine it will probably do more harm than good). I may write to the organ grinder himself stating the situation, what I can offer etc and express my disappointment.

 

On the other hand, any fuss that I kick up will most probably hinder my chances of being offered the position so until I find something else I will most probably keep my head down and try and stick it out.

 

We'll see!

 

Thank you for taking the time to respond to my questions.

 

Mr H

Link to post
Share on other sites

You most certainly will be entitled to holiday pay.

 

Have a look here for details http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Employment/Employees/Timeoffandholidays/DG_10029788

 

If it were me, without actually raising a grievance as such, I would be asking for a meeting with the employer to ask frank questions about my 'performance' and any pointers as to what more they would like to see me doing. You have made a couple of very eloquent statements above about your suitability and the value that you can bring to the business, and perhaps the right ears need to hear those comments?

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye.

There'll be a chap called Teaboy along in a bit who'll tell ya that they're in breach of contract and ya can sue em for every penny they've got.

Ignore him.

 

Now Now! :peace:

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Sidewinder.

 

I'll wait until I hear back from them (might have to chase it up tomorrow/Tues) and if I am not happy with what they say then I will ask for a meeting with the powers that be (although that may be difficult as I have been dealing with a senior member of staff at the moment and the next highest person is the chairman who is chairman of numerous other companies (this is a smallish company), but I will try :-)).

 

Thanks again. I will post how I get on!

 

Mr H

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...