Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks everyone for all your help, but unfortunately my case was dismissed. This is the 2nd time I've had this happen now so I doubt ill be taking on any parking firms in future sadly. The judge said I lost it on the grounds that the sign said I had 28 days to declare who the owner of the vehicle was, and said I should have complied with this.  My costs are Judgment for the claimant £133.33 Issue fee Hearing fee Solicitors costs - total £265 grand total £398.33 Do those costs look about right?
    • In that case I don't think you'd have any grounds for a claim against the receiver, short of anything actually criminal. The receiver was appointed by the lender so any claim you make should be aginst them. How much equity do you reckon there was when they took possession? Realistic value less outstanding balance (including arrears).  This messing around makes me wonder even more if the property was wildly over valued. Normally a lender would sell and not really care if they got the best price so long as they covered the balance plus their costs. 
    • Hey @lookinforinfo I'm not sure, I don't believe he told them he's the driver. He must have selected an option saying that he's appealing on behalf of the driver or something of the sort. In more news, however, these wannabe thugs are back at it again. Honestly, what a joke. In the letter they sent before this it said they had made "2 attempts" and in this letter they said "4 attempts", I wonder what happened to the "3rd attempt" lol.  WhatsApp Image 2024-04-18 at 14.06.07_44abc9c8.pdf
    • Hi all, I purchased a car in January from Big Motoring World Leeds. At the time of sale I was shown a tab on the salespersons computer marked 'service history' and I was able to take comfort knowing that the car had been serviced on 3 occasions as the date, mileage and company was there on screen. Being a 3 and a bit year old car that, in my mind, constituted full service history 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, collected the car a week later. Once home I settled down to through the book pack etc. Opened the service history booklet and it was completely blank. In addition there were no invoices detailing that any services had been done. I duly contacted BMW and asked them to supply me with proof of service history. They responded saying that on their 'vehicle documentation checklist' I had ticked and then signed to the fact that I had seen the service history and that I was happy with it. I dug out this checklist and what it actually states is 'seen service history online' which I had in the showroom. BMW seem to think that this satisfies their responsibility in providing service history. The reality is that I don't have any proof that the vehicle has ever been serviced! For my own peace of mind I ended up paying for a service that satisfied the manufacturers maintenance schedule to the tune of £330. I even complained to the finance company that the vehicle contravenes the Sale of Goods act 2015 as l, in effect, ot is not as described. Amazingly they weren't interested and instead I just got an email stating that it's not illegal to sell a vehicle without service history and that servicing costs were part and parcel of vehicle ownership. I've since complained to the ombudsman and am awaiting to see if they can help. I have no issue with the car but the treatment and customer service has been the worst I've ever experienced. I don't really know what to do next as I really do feel aggrieved that I've had to pay to service a car that should have already been serviced. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? 🙏
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Chased by UDS for Eon 'debt' of four-years ago


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4734 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

I hope someone can help me.

 

Utility Debt Services (UDS) have out of the blue started calling and texting me several times a week on my mobile regarding an 'outstanding' electricity bill for £215. The bill is in my name and the name of the person I was living with four years ago and with whom I am no longer in contact.

 

As far as I remember, we settled our bill with Eon when we left the property. What concerns me is that I no longer have any records regarding that period and can't prove we settled the bill and I can't dispute whatever meter number they give me since it is so long ago. It feels like their word against mine. I haven't given UDS or Eon my new address or contact details. I have also since married and changed my name - I didn't give them this information either. The only way they can contact me is via my mobile number - which miraculously is still the same as four years ago. They say they have sent me a letter to my old address of four years ago to recoup the money I supposedly owe them.

 

Given I can't prove I settled with them when I left and can no longer contact the person I used to live with to half the bill, should I ignore UDS's texts and calls and wait another two years until, according to the OFT, the six-year deadline for persuing bills lapses? Or should I try to settle with them in case they manage to track me down! Obviously this would grate as I feel like they would be tricking money out of me.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're sure you settled up when you moved out then why the worry? A cynic may suspect debt evasion, where you know there was money owing and now they've caught up you don't want to know - but, being CAG users, we give the benefit of the doubt and offer to help if we can.

 

The thing to do is ask them to prove that you owe any money. There is a letter in the templates library that should suit (top of page, look in brown menu bar for green 'Library' and follow the links). Quite simply, they have to show that you owe them money. They can't just say 'here is a bill, pay it' - it's quite possible your name was left on the account after you moved out, which happens a lot.

 

You would know when you left the property and they should have notes on you settling the bill at that time. It may be a case of sending a SAR, which will cost you £10, to get a copy of their records. You should then be able to go over that information and satisfy yourself that it is correct, or not as the case may be.

 

Ignoring them for another 2 years is not really on if you're sure you settled the bill, it achieves nothing taking that route. You either face up to them and sort it out or they'll continue to chase you.

  • Confused 1

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with British Gas. Ironically, I was with Eon for a short spell a year ago. They never mentioned anything then.

 

Btw, thanks Hillards for the advice and details of letter link. One further quick question, if it isn't a mistake and monies are owing, am I liable for the whole amount even though it was a joint bill with my former flat-mate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if it isn't a mistake and monies are owing, am I liable for the whole amount even though it was a joint bill with my former flat-mate?

It would be up to you to sort that out, the DCA won't care who pays as long as they get the money owing - or you can come to a deal with them.

 

Quite often they will settle for less than the full amount, but make sure you get a proper 'full and final' agreement out of that, so another DCA can't chase you again for the same bill - it happens!

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the time period a utility company has to contact you about a bill a lot less than 6 years?

 

Yes it is 12 months.

Which is why I asked who you were now with, as if you were still with E-on then they wouldn't have a leg to stand on, their argument could now be that they had to trace you to your current address, therefore that 12 month window won't apply, BUT, I am inclined to think that this won't be the case, they knew where you were all along, and they have now decided that they will attempt at fleecing you out of money you don't owe.

 

I'm not too sure whether their is a company rep on here from E-on or not? Actually no, come to think of it is Scottish power.

 

DCA's should be ignored, your agreement and contract is not with them., deal direct with E-on, the sooner people refuse to pay third party clown outfits, the sooner there will be no need for them.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Petersham2011

 

I'm sorry it's taken so long to contact you about your former property.

 

When you left the property 4 years ago, did you contact us with a leaving date and meter readings?

 

If you did, your account will have been closed down to this information and a final bill sent. Did you receive this? If you did, was this the account you settled 4 years ago?

 

Don't worry if you no longer have access to this bill. After 4 years, it's quite understandable if you no longer have it. Give us a call and ask for a copy of the bill we are basing our demands on. We'll be happy to send you this.

 

We will also have a record of the payments you made so will be able to tell you this.

 

Make sure the charges relate to your time in the property. Tell us if they don't and let us know the dates of your occupancy. We will need to amend the charges to reflect these dates although we may ask for proof like a Tenancy Agreement or mortgage documents.

 

Also, don't worry if you didn't give us meter readings at the time. We can estimate these from the history of your usage whilst you lived at the property.

 

Again, sorry it's taken so long to contact you but hope this is useful. Let me know if you need any more info as will be happy to help.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Malc! Welcome aboard, thank you for your time and assistance, I hope you will be just as good as the SSP rep and Vodafone rep.

Over to you.....:thumb:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks to everyone who helped me on the site. I did contact Eon directly, asked to speak to a manager and emailed him using the template in the library. He investiaged my complaint and this was his reply from yesterday:

 

I have now investigated this account further and found that the cause for you receiving a statement for energy usage in 2008 is due to the meter details for this property being crossed with another property. The resolution of this issue caused you to receive an amended statement. I have submitted this information to our billing code (also referred to as Back Billing Code) team who are investigating in more detail and will be contacting me within 10 working days with a report confirming their findings.

Once I have received this report I will contact you via email straight away to confirm our next actions. I would like to apologise to you for receiving this bill and I hope this hasn’t caused any stress or worry. I would also like to reassure you that you will receive no follow up regarding this until you are happy with the resolution of your complaint.

I hope that this will be the end of the issue - but it does show mistakes can occur and it was actually very stressful to receive calls from a debt collection agency for something I knew wasn't my fault.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being a former customer of E.On, I can tell you from experiance that they will do anything to try and fleece money out of customers who have left them. I still get them and UDS sending threatograms demanding money I don't owe them! They believe the regulations put in place to protect the consumer from their cowboy ways is just a technicality for consumers to hide behind and they can ignore them. E.On is one of the worst for this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the Ombudsman involved and they lied to him over all the facts. They were then told to provide me with certain information and I'm still waiting five years on. So whenever they or any DCA get in touch demanding money I just tell them to go and play with themselves.

Edited by cerberusalert
Link to post
Share on other sites

Must admit I used them for one month last year, never again! Still you live and learn..

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks to everyone who helped me on the site. I did contact Eon directly, asked to speak to a manager and emailed him using the template in the library. He investiaged my complaint and this was his reply from yesterday:

 

I have now investigated this account further and found that the cause for you receiving a statement for energy usage in 2008 is due to the meter details for this property being crossed with another property. The resolution of this issue caused you to receive an amended statement. I have submitted this information to our billing code (also referred to as Back Billing Code) team who are investigating in more detail and will be contacting me within 10 working days with a report confirming their findings.

Once I have received this report I will contact you via email straight away to confirm our next actions. I would like to apologise to you for receiving this bill and I hope this hasn’t caused any stress or worry. I would also like to reassure you that you will receive no follow up regarding this until you are happy with the resolution of your complaint.

 

I hope that this will be the end of the issue - but it does show mistakes can occur and it was actually very stressful to receive calls from a debt collection agency for something I knew wasn't my fault.

 

Hi Petersham2011

 

Crossed meters do occur in the energy industry and can cause considerable problems, particularly where there are multiple properties involved.

 

I have to say, it happens quite a lot with new builds where the developers give us the wrong details when advising of a change of responsibility. I'm not saying this is the case with your old place but it's something that does happen. To be frank, these can take a while to sort out.

 

However, now it's been recognised as a crossed meter and a manager is handling your complaint, this should reduce the time taken to sort it out. He's also involved the Billing Code Team which is a positive step.

 

Also, as he says, there will be no follow up whilst there's an open complaint on the account.

 

I'm sorry you've had to suffer all this Petersham but glad it's now in the right area and is being sorted. Give me a shout if you need any more info from me as will be happy to help.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...