Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

NEMO loan #PPI & Central Trust plc


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4119 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

A family friend undertook a huge loan with Nemo for 44k in 2007 and had 12k:jaw: of ppi front ended to it!! So they are investigating the chances of clawing back the ppi and received a letter from Nemo stating the following:

 

"I confirm after checking our records that the loan and ppi was arranged by a broker with Nemo acting as the lender. Central Capital made the arrangements, responsibility for investigating the complaint rests with them and I have forwarded your complaint to them at this address:

 

Central Trust plc, St Crispin House, Duke St, Norwich, NR3 1PD

 

I sort of get the feeling that they are passing the buck here. Has anyone out there in forum land had any dealings with either Nemo or Central Trust:???:. This looks like being a battle which could end up at the door of the FOS.

 

Your thoughts and guidance would be appreciated here please ... Thanks vm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

Wondering if you have a copy of the letter that was 1st sent to nemo as i am just starting out on trying to reclaim my PPI from them.

 

Many thanks

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rob,

 

I just used a template from one of the many that are around , not sure if i should say another site on here !!, Filled in the blanks and sent it off , Be warned buy plenty of stamps !!, they will also telephone you , do not talk about claim on phone ,(they will record it and try to trick you) tell them to put it in writing ,

 

Good luck ,i will let the forum know the outcome of my claim

 

Regards

 

Beer

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 6 months later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 9 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...