Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Repossesion Set For 11am 6th April Any Help Please.


sponderela
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4734 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well of course!! you have to explain to the judge what the objections are. You have to show the judge the FSA rulings and their decisions. You have to explain to the judge why he should accept that they have broken the law in the way that they have dealt with your business.

 

Did you think that you were going there for a chat and a cup of tea?

 

Thanks that made me laugh, i have attatched that info ect to the application what i meant was shall i tell Kensington this when i fax them a letter might it make them back off a bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes, why not. Keep it short but tell them that you are going to see the judge because that it has come to your attention that they have breached their statutory duty to act fairly. Tell them also that you have discovered that they have already been fined for exactly the same behaviour by the FSA in April 2010.

 

Here is a link http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/kensington.pdf

 

download this and read it carefully.

 

Show it to the judge and tell him that it is clear that Kensington have already been in trouble for this and have been fined £1.75 millions and yet it seems that they are still doing it. (Have you received this level of charges since April 2010???).

 

Explain to the judge that it is partly because of this that you have been unable to cope and to keep your promises. That you have only just now found out about the FSA regs and Kensington's previous record for this and that I would not be in the interests of justice to allow Kensington to benefit from their breach of the law and that you need the stay in order to put in an SAR - 40 days and then to analyse the data disclosure and to prepare your arguments.

 

The judge may just end up giving you a couple of weeks for a hearing to take place - and then you'll be able to put your case for a full stay of two months.

 

You had better not put your head in the sand again on this - or if you do, don't come back here.

 

I think that with the FSA decision already against Kensington, you have a fair chance of success.

 

Go and do all your homework and be completely familiar with all of the cases and the arguments and your figures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court will have already faxed your N244 and statement to the lender as soon as you lodged it at court. They have to give them the opportunity to send a representative.

 

In your statement did you detail what you are offering to pay and quote the Norgan case law?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In your statement did you detail what you are offering to pay and quote the Norgan case law?

 

What is Norgan case law sorry ?

 

This is the info i put on my statement plus i attatched the FSA ruling and info plus statments with at least £1500 of charges on them.

 

I am asking for the court to postpone the eviction dated 06/03/11 for 2 months because i believe the arrears are substantually less than what they are asking. This is because the charges and administration fees should have been levied at cost price and have been levied at an excessive rate and exceeded administrative costs therefore they are unlawful. Also they have been adding the charges to the balance and levying interest on the charges, this is unlawful and breaches their FSA statutory duty i would request a further 2 months stay to obtain all of my data and work out the true arrears cost and have another hearing. I can make the standard monthly payment while this goes on. I have attatched details of a small qty of charges totalling £1500 plus FSA details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck for today. Your emphasis should also be on the unfair treatment of you by them and the fact that it is clear that they are acting in breach of FSA rules.

 

You have had all of your chances. The FSA breaches are the only new thing that you have to offer the judge. Make sure that he sees the Kensington judgment.

 

If he is minded to give you a chance because of Kensington violations, then you will have to use the other material which you have prepared to show him that you are taking the matter seriusly and that if you are given another chance, that you will be able to put together a plan which will get the situation under control

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

Thanks so much for your help. Went to court today i told the judge all the info about the FSA rulings etc. The Kensingtons Rep said we are apposing the eviction being postponed. The judge asked him for my statements, he said he did not have any detailed information about my account. The Judge postponed for 2 weeks for them to send all my statements etc to the court and to me and then have another hearing to determin the true arrears. Kensingtons Rep told him this case has been going on for 5 years, 2 weeks may not be enough because it will be a substantial document so the judge said he would give them 21 days to deliver the information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could now get the printout from the OFT and FSA where they fined Kensington for overstating charges and check to see if any of the mentioned charges are on your account, that is unless you have alread had them refunded.... I bet they have charged for Advisors visits and lots and lots of solicitors charges (you really need the invoices for these charges as they like to claim fees, charges, file fees etc etc at least twice on each occasion). I think I have the Kensington ruling on my old PC...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done. You have pulled off a miracle.

 

The advice which SG1 has given you is correct. However, begin by sending Kensington an SAR. Do it now. Send it recorded with a cheque or payment which you are sure will not bounce.

Keep copies of everything.

 

Get all of your info together as SG1 has suggested and come here for advice.

 

Your attack is two-pronged.

 

Show that Kensington have acted unfairly in breach of FSA regs in the way that they have conducted your business and in the charges they levied against you and the way those charges have been applied.

 

Show that once things are properly calculated and the true position is revealed, that you will be able to propose a scheme of payments which deals with everything correctly and brings your mortgage back on track reasonably quickly.

 

You could also ask for a declaration form the court that Kensington have breached their statutory obligations. This would help Kensington to take things seriously themselves and to stop bullying.

 

No. 1 is to send the SAR NOW.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure that your SAR says that you want everything in whatever form including notes, screennotes, statements, external and internal correspondence, invoices from legal representatives, counsellor visits - and anything else that they may hold on you.

 

Get very tough with Kensington. Make sure that they understand that any trouble form them will be reported to the OFT and to the FSA.

 

Once again, if you are not going to follow this through then let us know now so that we don't waste our time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done. You have pulled off a miracle.

 

.

You certainly have - and it's thanks to Bankfodder for giving you such sound advice re the charges. I fully expected the judge to order the eviction. I really do hope you fully understand just how lucky you were this morning!

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've only helped you with roughing up kensington a little.

You will have to follow the advice from Ell-en and Lea for the long term solution.

Be realistic. If you think that you can't handle the mortgage then use the extra to plan the most advantageous exit you can.

If you can start making any payments now to reduce the debt as well as to show willing, you should so.

 

 

From my phone

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate to rain on anyone's parade, but this is just a short stop on the likely route to eviction. The judge would not order the eviction to go ahead when the arrears are in dispute. It is still enough to warrant eviction once all the charges are taken off the arrears figure.

 

The reason the judge asked for the documentation is so that he can see if the arrears by themselves warrant eviction - had the other side prepared themselves properly with the right statements of account, the warrant would not have been adjourned.

 

Justice demands the correct figures are used.

 

All the OP now has is a three week breathing space - unless he clears the arrears that aren't in dispute, or substantially reduces them - the mortgage company will get their warrant approved.

Edited by Lea_HTH
mixed up another poster's situation
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that is definitely raining on the parade - but I expect that you are probably right.

 

The only long shot would be to show the judge that had the payments been levied fairly and applied fairly that the present situation might not have arisen. That and a substantial reduction, as you say

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that is definitely raining on the parade - but I expect that you are probably right.

 

The only long shot would be to show the judge that had the payments been levied fairly and applied fairly that the present situation might not have arisen. That and a substantial reduction, as you say

 

I'm a realist, and I think it's better to let people know that their worst outcome could still be a possibility, particularly in a case like this where multiple stays have already been allowed.

 

The arrears are very high - that's the problem - even with the charges removed (and I suspect some of those charges are litigation charges, which are perfectly legal).

 

If the OP is proactive (there's been no prior evidence that he is), then he may be able to resolve this to the point where he is able to stay in the property - but it's clearly going to take a lot of effort on his part to do all the necessary checking, obtaining of information and so forth.

 

I wish him good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make sure that your SAR says that you want everything in whatever form including notes, screennotes, statements, external and internal correspondence, invoices from legal representatives, counsellor visits - and anything else that they may hold on you.

 

Get very tough with Kensington. Make sure that they understand that any trouble form them will be reported to the OFT and to the FSA.

 

Once again, if you are not going to follow this through then let us know now so that we don't waste our time.

 

Hi Again,

 

Sorry to bother you all again, on the ico website Kensington is listed twice,as kensington mortgage group limited and kensington mortgages both have the same address which should i put on the SAR ?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kensington

Gateway House

Gargrave House

Skipton

North Yorkshire

BD23 2HL

 

Hope this helps.

 

But it has to be sent to the address registered with the data commisioner and this is not the registered address of either

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phone them and ask them the name and address of the data controller.

Frankly if you send it to their reg office then that will be fine.

 

You need to get it off today. Should have been done yesterday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that if you send an SAR to that address it will be responded to, but Bankfodder is correct, it will ensure it gets to the right person if you get the name and address of their data gatherer and dont forget use at least recorded delivery as method of postage! Please also remember that Kensington will then have 40 days to send you info.

 

DCAHELP - I think a few lenders use this address, I know Mortgage Express do aswell!!!!! It must be a home for crooks LOL!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will use the address on the bottom of the letter they sent me that is registered with the data people. It was a nightmare trying to get information when i called and asked for the data controller information, they said they did not know what i was talking about. One of the operators gave me this number 0207 5974000 which was answered investec bank when i asked is that Kensington she said well yes ??. Never heard of them before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Make a note of that conversation. This is an example of the kind of obstructive behaviour you are experiencing in your effort to find out the full extent of their unfair treatment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update, new court date is 5th May, Kensington must Serve and file a statment showing an accurate history of the arrears and how they are calculated by 4pm on 20th April. Thanks again everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...