Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Supposed call from sky


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4513 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Phone rings and man says he is ringing from sky and that as nearly had the equipment as on end of june for a year I could insure it. I asked him when was the free 12 months viewing form sky up and it only ran from agreement of sattisfied with offer with second tear complaints and asked him could he give me the date.

 

He said oh, you would have to contact customer services up for that and I added as the box has just been replaced I assume there is a guarantee on it still.

 

Anyhow he then said, chaged his tune that he was ringing up on behalf of sky and I said you are not sky so why say you are. He said on behalf of sky, so I said you should make that clear in the first breath of the call, not later as I am aware of [problem] insurance companies ringing.

 

Tells me they are domestic and general and if I check the sky site they are able to contact us with details from sky and I think this is disgusting as this is not the first time they have called, plus I am aware from these sites that they can be techy where they got the phone number from when questioned why indicate they are sky.

 

I feel sky are responsible as there are enough people saying similar calls from people saying they are sky, to prove it is not random. Sky therefore are putting us at risk of handing over phone details to who we think we can trust as it was only when I asked details on when my insurance ran out due to the free viewing and replaced box and he got stuck with his sales pitch.

 

SKY STOP PASSING DETAILS TO COMPANIES WHO SAY THEY ARE YOU. We also get the companies who are not related to sky but yet get the same details as domestic and general, sky say it is not them who pass the details on, so I suspect at a guess that there is a chance for abuse, if a company cannot ring and straight away admit they are who they are, then it is possible our details could be sold on when of no value to the legit insurance company.

 

Only a guess of course, but someone passes our numbers to these other charletons and sky say it is not them:!:

 

I also dont remember saying to sky at any point you can pass my details onto your friends or that gone 19.30 is an appropriate time for call from sales relating to my sky account or box, I always click no sales or details to be passed around.

 

Also sky after the 12 months of free viewing is up and I have to decided wether to reknew I will have to consider wether I am happy with you passing my details on, I mean they must pay you for these?

 

He even asked me how happy I was with the service of sky so far, hence me saying fine when given the free 12 months viewing due to problems. So I feel even the legit insurer if they are that have some reps clearly interpreting their promoted as the skys choice of insurer as we call ourselves sky!!!!! Or are we to assume any commision paid for our details is worth them being prepared to answer to deal with us ringing and depending on who you speak to you get either we give your details to no one. or yes we endorse domestic and general.

 

I suspect SKY know very well what they do, so why after years of reading such threads is it still going on?

 

Disgusting as I was just starting to feel happy with sky once more after the trauma of them having problems with taking over my broadband account by letting my line go dead due to faulty take over and not helping and then slamming the line when contract cancelled.

 

Please behave sky:-( I dont need the hastle.

Edited by watchinginvestigation2011
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

I have been a sky customer on and off now for 8 years and until yesterday I had never received a call for Sky regarding set top box insurance. Long story short, my minimum contractual obligation lapsed some time ago and as I am happy with my package and the price I have remained with sky but not bought into a new contract. When I spoke to the gent yesterday who claimed to be from Sky he wanted to know why I didn’t my two HD boxes insured against failure or accidental damage, I simply explained that the £200 per year was an unnecessary expense and if anything happened to the boxes I would simply buy a replacement off ebay. He said nothing, when I say he said nothing I mean he hung up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately a lot of big companies out source telemarketing now. Eg Npower use RESQ contact services Ltd and they call you up stating they are infact Npower when they are not. The following week the same company will call you up claiming to be Eon.

 

This is clearly a misleading practise and should be complained about as per CPUT regs 2008.

 

Unfortunately your data is probably splurged all over the place because of your dealings with Sky. Perhaps send Sky a Section 10 notice. ( Data Protection Act)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tps...

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't stop them!

 

We have had a few calls about insuring our Sky box, they don't seem to want to take no for an answer either!

Makes it illegal to call though, so you can report them.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Makes it illegal to call though, so you can report them.

 

Does it?

 

I thought the TPS was to stop unwanted cold marketing calls, but at some point you would have given the go ahead to Sky to give out your details? I.e. you've given them permission for them to call you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it?

 

I thought the TPS was to stop unwanted cold marketing calls, but at some point you would have given the go ahead to Sky to give out your details? I.e. you've given them permission for them to call you?

For Sky, yes. But not for another company.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...