Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Robinson Way hassling mum on dead dad's 1998/99 joint loan with Lloyds TSB


nish40
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4543 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks Brigadier And Kurvface.

 

Kurv, yes it was a CCA request, and in the letter I did state I wanted all signed documents, letters, phone transcripts, statements etc regarding the account. I asked for every shred.

We got a letter 1 month after the request to say they did not get the £10, so we got proof from the PO they had cashed it through their banking system. Then they said they had credited the account by mistake so they would send the SAR. After another 2 months passed they wrote back asking again what information I wanted, so again I told them the same as before. I kept both letters.

I have written again now, and asked if what they sent is all they have as its not just agreements missing, on the front page they tell me no PPI details are filed as they do not hold them??????

 

I will follow the advice you both gave and see what happens. They do communicate in writing now and do not phone, I made sure of this as even up to last year, 9 years after my dad passing away, they have been ringing asking for him. They do not ring since I kicked off. Thank you both for the advice, I will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent that letter I mentioned, Lloyds TSB have wrote back.

The letter dated 4th November states that my mum has received ALL outstanding information they hold. If that is the case, as the letter says, there is no agreement, no PPI documents, so they have no connection of this debt onto my mum, am I right?

We always believed that when my dad died, he was the only person responsible on the PPI they had, they decided it was my mums policy.

 

I told her what was strange was that they put my mum as first signator like they said, yet she only worked 16 hrs a week while my dad worked 60+.

My mum was only part time, yet they put her first signator for a loan of 10k.

 

My mum paid Robinson Way £474 in total, with no proof of liability so should I write and ask for a refund?

Also, should I also ask Lloyds TSB for a refund also. Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest the same action on RW send them a SAR

lets see if they have anything at all passed on from the OC.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Guys.

 

Kurv, Lloyds TSB in their reply letter to me asking if they had withheld any agreements or statements etc from the SAR received, they wrote, All outstanding information they hold was included in the SAR.

 

Brig, thanks will send the SAR to Robbers way today, see what they can come back with. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...