Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

stevensdrake just sent court claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4517 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

thanks krios, I'm feeling pretty ****. From what i've been reading it seems that they might be able to try me in this juristaction. But i am curious to know will a judge take into account personal circumstanes or is it just black and white! I'm just starting my own business and my wife is a student and we have two young children, if thus judgement goes against me, it will potentially leave us bankrupt. Any help please......

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

thanks krios, I'm feeling pretty ****. From what i've been reading it seems that they might be able to try me in this juristaction. But i am curious to know will a judge take into account personal circumstanes or is it just black and white! I'm just starting my own business and my wife is a student and we have two young children, if thus judgement goes against me, it will potentially leave us bankrupt. Any help please......

 

If UK debts cannot be enforced in Australia (and this has been proven) - then how can the reverse be allowed? Personally, I think you have excellent defense options - although I'm not a lawyer. Court date is not until June 30, so plenty of time for others more qualified to come along and offer assistance.Best of luck to you - wish I could help in some way.W.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone out there help me with one more thing please, Can i set up a tomlin order or is it too late for me to try negotiate a settlement figure? Do i need to set up a tomlin order through a solicitor? Thanks andy advise appricated. Docker1

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

You need to agree a settlement before you can file a Tomlin Order. A precedent can be found at http://www.cedr.com/library/documents/settlement_agreement.pdf - but there is no point in doing so until you reach an agreement. If they are so confident that they will obtain a summary judgment, then they are unlikely to settle for anything but the full amount claimed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone out there help me with one more thing please, Can i set up a tomlin order or is it too late for me to try negotiate a settlement figure? Do i need to set up a tomlin order through a solicitor? Thanks andy advise appricated. Docker1

 

What's the latest, docker1? Are you trying to negotiate a settlement with them, or will you defend in court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
I wonder if Docker was gagged by Stevens Drake as a condition of a settlement. I have heard that they do this. If true i wonder why? :-)

 

I wouldn't think so. I came to an agrement with them (using a Tomlin order). There were no conditions attached to that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be really interested to hear the results of docker1's situation. I am in the same position, receiving calls and letters from SD on behalf of Credit Corp Services for a large Australian Debt.

 

It is a letter that states they have acquire the debt from St. George bank. They explicitly state they offer offers no payment options except cheque or bank transfer to an Australian or British account for the full amount. It isn't a legal demand or threat to issue court proceedings. The last page of the letter has a paragraph that states:

 

"Notes: If you are unable to make an offer we MAY ask you to complete a form of Personal Financial Statement which comprises of the same information that you would have to supply in legal proceedings".

 

This feels like them taking a punt at getting an offer, but I am reluctant to acknowledge the debt with them in any way.

 

In the case of my debt, I lived in Australia from 2001 to end 2007 - I took Australian citizenship just before I left - and 4 months before I left I was made redundant from my job and informed the bank verbally of that (I had redundancy protection on the loan) - the bank department I spoke to were not interested in this and just wanted to know when the next payment was coming in. I left the country shortly after with my wife and child for work and to live. I passed on our address details to the bank and continued to make payments for a while. My circumstances changed coming back to the UK (50% wage cut) and I had to stop payments but have heard nothing from them for 3 years. I don't have anyway of making an offer on even a fraction of this debt that would be accepted - especially since the interest and exchange rate have doubled it, so I'm in survival mode for my family. When I took the loan out it was about £15k - I repayed over £15k on the loan in Australia and they are now demanding £30k. I'm not proud of the situation, nor have I any debt in the UK.

 

Any further advice from on this issue is appreciated - especially from docker1. I have to say that forums such as this and those that take their time to contribute their advice are an invaluable resource to others and much appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

In the absence of any additional news on the outcome of docker1's case I thought I would keep this thread alive as I am going through the same thing.

 

After being hounded by S&D, I replied stating that I did not recognise the loan attributed to me and requesting they prove it. They sent a snarky letter back but followed up with the loan docs and an NOA 3 months later.

 

The NOA states the loan was acquired within the period that Credit Corp didn't have a license, but I think that is a bit of a dead end reading the forum - perhaps they successfully tested it in court - since they seem to be issuing Court Orders now.

 

I am 100% that I was not sent the NOA - which includes 10k worth of additional interest.

 

My response has been to ask them to prove the NOA was sent and stating that I do not recognise I have a debt with Credit Corp. I had a solicitor look at everything and they confirmed that such debt could be chased from Aus in UK due to reciprocal agreements in law.

 

I am going to contact the original lender though and ask them to confirm that they assigned a debt to a business that had no license to act as a DCA.

 

If it goes to court, I have no assets or cash so it will be a very very long repayment offer anyway. Would love to find out if anyone else has actually gone to court over SD and what the outcome was.

 

One thing I thought was interesting was this from the OFT website:

 

"The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the Act) requires businesses that offer goods or services on credit and/or are involved in activities relating to credit or hire, such as debt collection to be licensed by the OFT. "

 

The register is online at the OFT website (cant post link yet) and a search doesn't turn up anything for Credit Corp or SD. Surely the activity they are engaged in is debt collecting and as such they need to be licensed by the OFT - if they are not then they are in breach of the Consumer Credit Act right?

Edited by monkatron
updating
Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a solicitor look at everything and they confirmed that such debt could be chased from Aus in UK due to reciprocal agreements in law.

 

 

 

Can you please get them to quote which agreement they refer too?. A UK debt is not enforceable in aus (where no judgment exists) as shown in the overseas forum sticky so what agreement alows an Aus debt to be enforced here? Maybe try another solicitor?

Edited by krios
update
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Can you please get them to quote which agreement they refer too?. A UK debt is not enforceable in aus (where no judgment exists) as shown in the overseas forum sticky so what agreement alows an Aus debt to be enforced here? Maybe try another solicitor?

 

Any idea about OZ agreement enforceable in US?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Any idea about OZ agreement enforceable in US?

 

Hi matecall, Couple of things.. the State you live in is going to be important. Statute of Limitations varies from state to state. If the debt is older then the SOL in your state then they can't pursue you for the debt. What they can do in this case is try and get an Aussie judgement against you and then have it registered in your state (the SOL doesnt apply in this case). Its very unlikely they will try this.

 

US law is pretty strong in this area. You are protected, federally by the FDCPA and FCRA. States often have added protection on top of these and they can only enhance not take away from the Federal laws. You need to start researching at once about what you need to do... If your interested I can send you some links that helped me out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello Peteyc,

Please can you send me the links you have? I was reading about statute of limitations since long time, but really having hard time in understanding which SOL apply s ( AUS vs US).

( I am living in US nearly since 6 years, especially in current state (PA) since 3 years. My state SOL is 4 years for contract agreements. When it comes to US states, each state has diffent SOL, but debtor living state's SOL applies normally. This can be changed if debt contract states, which is highly unlikely. )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Peteyc,

Please can you send me the links you have? I was reading about statute of limitations since long time, but really having hard time in understanding which SOL apply s ( AUS vs US).

( I am living in US nearly since 6 years, especially in current state (PA) since 3 years. My state SOL is 4 years for contract agreements. When it comes to US states, each state has diffent SOL, but debtor living state's SOL applies normally. This can be changed if debt contract states, which is highly unlikely. )

 

Here's my take on it... and should not be taken as legal advice..

 

The SOL that will apply if action is taken in PA is 4 years. If they decide to take action in Aus then it would be the Australian SOL. As it's over 4 years they cannot take action in PA. If they took action in Aus, they could then attempt to enforce the Australian judgement in a PA court as a foreign judgement, very unlikely as the SOL is just about up in Aus as well.

 

Here's a few questions...

 

Have you received any calls or letters from a US based debt collection agency or just the Australian creditor.

 

If it's only the Aussie creditor then cease all communication with them. You don't have to talk to them in any way at all. Don't acknowledge the debt. If they continue to call you, you can complain to the relevant Australian authority to get them to cease..

 

If you have been contacted by a US based debt collection agency, the rules change a little. If you let me know if thats happened I can explain what I think you need to do...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's my take on it... and should not be taken as legal advice..

 

The SOL that will apply if action is taken in PA is 4 years. If they decide to take action in Aus then it would be the Australian SOL. As it's over 4 years they cannot take action in PA. If they took action in Aus, they could then attempt to enforce the Australian judgement in a PA court as a foreign judgement, very unlikely as the SOL is just about up in Aus as well.

 

Here's a few questions...

 

Have you received any calls or letters from a US based debt collection agency or just the Australian creditor.

 

If it's only the Aussie creditor then cease all communication with them. You don't have to talk to them in any way at all. Don't acknowledge the debt. If they continue to call you, you can complain to the relevant Australian authority to get them to cease..

 

If you have been contacted by a US based debt collection agency, the rules change a little. If you let me know if thats happened I can explain what I think you need to do...

 

Thanks for information. Now i have understand that, local law always override foreign law in US. Australian DCA contacted and threatened that they have agents in USA. So far their US agents not contacted me.

I recently talked to lawyer. He suggested to cease all communication with them. He will deal with US agents if they contact me.

Finally, i need to find out what would be the contract term with bank regards to litigation.

Any idea, how it would be Australian bank (especially Commonwealth) terms gernerally?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No sorry.. I wouldn't know what the terms are for any particular bank. Btw.. I don't know what part of Australia you where in or where this debt is coming from but the SOL of 6 years in NSW, means that not only can they not attempt to take legal action after 6 years, they have to cease trying to collect the debt all together I believe. This applies to NSW debts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...