Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance : Terms & Conditions (T&C's)


Dibbothe3rd
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3825 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well said pwg! without respect for their customers they are even less likely to receive payment!

I am a consumer just like you, please get a second opinion or investigate yourself on anything I advise as I am in no way legally trained. Everything I know has come from the Mighty CAG and fellow CAGGERS. :cool:

 

If I have helped in any way please click my reputation star and make a donation to CAG to enable us all to continue to help each other :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 147
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

F*ck Em That`s what I say. F*ck Em ALL.

 

I hope their eyes fester and drop out. IMHO They are all two faced [causing problems] little bas***ds. They should all be shot at dawn. Plenty of volunteers for that job?

 

The Company deserves everything that will eventually come to them.

 

The staff appear on here now and again. Telling us how they care and want to help, but they don`t help do they? They all wrap their claw in after two questions and are then never heard from again. The problem is they are like mushrooms...............and fed on bull s**t. They don`t really know enough to help us. They all of a sudden after a few questions from Caggers realise they are working for legalised loan sharks. Some even decide they like the kudos of being a thug like the TW*T who harassed my Wife for so long. The others just fade away and die in shame for having engaged in the endemic, widespread culture of bullying and lying that is Welscums trade description.

 

I enjoyed that as wel.l Thank You all. MARK

Link to post
Share on other sites

bog standard letter everyone that even mentions PPI is getting - I wrote to them as I have an agreement on a PPI refund however they sent me the same stupid questionnaire asking me when i became aware of a complaint etc etc

 

Wow....bog standard letter we received today I think......Havn't seen it yet but says they will have answer re mis-sold ppi by January.......Obviously didnt read our letter properly either as no mention of cancelling within 30 day period.LOL.

 

Will post tomorrow to let you know what it says exactly.

 

Dawnx

Link to post
Share on other sites

well im about to send off my reply letter stating that they have completely ignored my letter and they can see I was not reclaiming mis-sold PPI as I did not take it out.

 

I am also adding in the CCA request letter and the £1 postal order. I will do the SAR at a later date because I first want to see if they have a proper copy of my agreement.

 

lets see how they cope with that heh heh.

 

if they dont reply within the 14 days im putting the account into dispute until I get my insurances refunded as the agreement encompasses both the credit agreement for the insurances and the HP agreement for the car and the monthly repayment figure is one amount therefore the agreement is to be treated as one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dibbothe3rd,

They replied to my letter regarding mis-sold ppi but totally ignored the part about the 30 day clause.!!!!!

 

Have done a letter to send to them on my thread but am also waiting for Postggj to see if he has any different ideas.

 

Good luck with your letters......Keep us updated.

 

Dawnx

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah I read that Dawny, they bloody useless.

 

I think the fact that they will stop getting money from me should kick them into gear, I mean how hard can it be to read a letter??

 

If I ever acting the way they do in my work, I would be sacked immediately.

Edited by Dibbothe3rd
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

ok, im beginning to wonder how far down the pile my CCA request letter has gone now that they are well and truely stuffed.

 

plus, they signed for it on the 10th so in my calcs, that gives them til 4th Jan to reply. doubt they will thought. they prob cant be arsed any more. looks like Mrs Young will be dealing with it herself after all the staff desert the company!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, today I received a letter thanking me for my original letter sent back in October and stating that it is still being investigated! guess they need time to fabricate fake letters and documents etc...

 

anyway, no mention of my CCA request or my letter sent to them a week ago...guess they ignoring this one!

Link to post
Share on other sites

received today a reply to my CCA request. the letter somehow refered to a Subject Access Request so a bit miffed. They did sent a copy of the agreement, which is actually a copy of the one I signed and has been signed by them, they also sent me a statement upto Dec 2009 which is clean and correct.

 

everything seems ok unless im missing something. But they still havent dealt with my insurance claim yet!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Do you think that nearly 80 days is long enough for them to process my request to have my insurances refunded? seems like they are dragging it out. I cant see what the issue is. think I will send them a reminder letter and give them 14 days to resolve it.

 

I know they have other things on their minds but surely how hard can it be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dibbo,

I think 80 days is plenty.

 

I would definitely send them a reminder.After all it's not your fault re the predicament they are in.:rolleyes:

 

They replied to my letter with regards to the PPI mis-selling but totally ignored the 30 day thing.LOL

 

They said they would have a final response by 8th January so am going to wait until then and then remind them again that I was asking for a full refund due to the 30 day rule.

 

I did do a draft on my thread of a letter I thought I would send them..(post 181 on my thread) ....but never did as Poste was doing one for me.(He seems too busy at the moment so will send that letter when 8th Jan is passed.)

 

Good luck and keep us informed.

 

Dawnx

Edited by dawnytrish
Link to post
Share on other sites

60 days is the norm to process any dispute

 

have i seen the agreement

 

Yes you have seen it post. its on the 1st page of this thread. as far as im aware the agreement is ok. But the insurances I feel have been mis sold as not only did I not receive any paperwork for them at the time of purchase, when I asked for them to send me copies, I found that the Mech Breakdown was only for 24 months yet my agreement for the HP is for 48 months. Had I had know this I would of cancelled anyway and found alternative cover.

 

As I only received the copy Insurance documents in October 2009 when I asked for them, I wrote to them to cancel under the 30 day rule.

 

They replied by sending me the questionaire about PPI which is irelevant as I didnt take PPI out. I then wrote to inform them of this and refered them back to my original letter.

 

They then replied to a CCA request with a true signed copy of my agreement which appears to be ok and an up to date statement which is correct.

 

They also mentioned that my previous claim for insurance refund is being investigated and looked at but no definate resolution date put on it.

 

The only thing I havent done is spoke to aviva to see if I do infact have policies with them. I will do this next before writing to welcome to chase up my refund.

 

PS... glad your back post. hows the knee?

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, I sent my chase letter today for my insurance claim. I have given them 14 days from date of letter, dated yesterday, so will add a day on. (shhhh heh heh)

 

anyways if they havent resolved it by XXth Jan as per letter, I will place the whole account into dispute and stop all payments as its a combined credit/hp agreement and they only quoted on repayment figure therefore they treat it as one and so do I. (laws are a guideline)

 

They have had over 70 days now so as per Direct Group insurance T&C, they have gone over their 5 days and 20 day limits by a considerable amount so stuff em.

 

wish me luck!

 

Dibbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Turning Inn

Ill Give A Clue

 

A And M On The Agreement TO START WITH

THEN

 

 

258.59 Times By 48 Gives 12412.32

 

 

Total Amount Payable (f) 12414.40

 

You Also Have The Option Fee But Ill Leave That For Now

 

Ponder On It And Ill See You In The Morning

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes I have noticed all that Post. But it seems that Boxes D,E & F are notional as the amount credited to my account was £12412.32 as per my statement which is the correct amount based on the repayments.

 

but seeing as the agreement does not tell me exactly what I am paying, ie does not show that I am repaying £12412.32, it does not tell me I have to pay and extra £1 on the final payment at the end of the agreement in order to keep the car.

 

all it does tell me is that im paying 48 x £258.59. So how do I know that I am paying the right amount??

 

I assume this means that the agreement has not been correctly executed?? but is there a case over £2?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you bet there is

2 quid does not sound alot but multiply that by the apr over the term of the agreement

 

the apr only has to be out by 1% above or 0.5 below what is stated

 

but i cant answer that question

 

you will need some one to work out the true cost of the apr with the 2 quid difference

 

the total amount payable has been miss quoted:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...