Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi dx, thanks. Yes actually, that is the case with this one! I've taken tomorrow off work, I need to review the whole binder for each of these and I'll refrain from further questions until I do just that. Just on hold for court ref Claim #2
    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CSA non compliance


skiton
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4711 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have had an on going fight with the CSA since September 2004 over arrears of just over £2000. Basically I requested a re-assesment in september 04 as I had changed careers and was on a lower income. Each time I called them I was always put through to someone who could'nt help and was always told someone would call me back to deal with my request, but no-one ever did.

About two years later I got a call from the CSA saying they were returning my call and how could they help. I went balistic and after I had calmed down I explained again about my request, again I was told that they would have to get someone to call me back as that particular person could not help. Any way about a year passed and I received a letter from the CSA saying that they had done a re-assesment and that there would be no change to my payments. I called the CSA and asked where they got the info from in order to carry out a re-assesment. The info they used was over 10yrs old and when I explained the above again, again I was told someone would call me to sort it out. Anyway after many more letters and calls over a 5yr period I get a letter dated 1/4/09 stating that the CSA intend to apply to a Magistrates court for a liability order. So I called the nice people at Bolton to find out what was going on and explained again the situation with my request and was told again someone would call me back.

 

No-one called and in May 09 I received a letter stating a liability order had been granted.

I called Belfast Enforcement and explained the situation yet again and was told that the liability order would be put on hold and someone would call me to sort it out. I have recieved only 2 calls since then from the CSA chasing the arrears, and not to sort out my request. The last call I received was in October 2010, I explained the situation again, and again was told someone would call me back the following week, and guess what! no one has.

Today 14/3/11, I received I letter from Marston enforcement giving me 7 days to pay the arrears or they will visit my home to levy on goods and thereafter remove the goods for public auction. Called the CSA again today and guess what, someone is going to call me back LOL.

 

Where do I stand as to non-compliance to a request for re-assesment. And as far as Marstons are concerned is this a civil debt and can I deal with the bailiffs as a civil debt situation.

Also going to arrange to see a solicitor about the whole thing.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly

1. When was the last time u made payment

2. If your earnings change once you have let them know it's down to them to re assess you on new income

3. R u Still paying?

 

You can combat this by sending sar requesting all communication activity including phone calls and letter responses as this will show you tried to solve this issue

u must do thus asap

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR is in the post, for a next day delivery signed for.

Last payment was made in Sept 04 just before my eldest was 17. CSA was informed over the phone that I would not be making any more payments until re-assesment was made on new income. I had 1 more year to go before my youngest was 17.

 

As mentioned above re assesment was done in Oct 2007 but this was done using info I gave to them in 1988.

Edited by skiton
Link to post
Share on other sites

Why didn't you go to court to attend liability hearing this is why they are hounding you as the court has given csa judgement as you didn't attend!

 

When I recieved the letter about the liability hearing I called the CSA and explained again the situation and it was supposed to be put on hold, I was told someone would call to sort the problem out but no one called.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Called CSA explained situation again to supervisor, told her my intentions with SAR and legal action, and it is now going to be sorted out. Also spoke to Newcastle Legal Enforcement and bailff action is going to be put on hold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if the CSA bailiff contractors can use self employed bailiffs. Regarding my first post, the re-assessment that was done, was done in Oct 2007 using info I gave to the CSA in 1988.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just an update. Still not heard anything from CSA regarding my case. Received my SAR but missing important telephone transcripts, lots of them in there but not the important ones. I have a list of calls I made between 2005 and 2010, the name of the person I spoke to, time and date of call and call duration but none of these appear in the SAR. Also telephone transcript in the SAR from my original call in 2004 but big chunk of it missing, I know this because I have it on tape. Will write to them again asking for the transcipts for these particular calls.

They state several times in the SAR that they have no record of any calls from me between 2004 and 2011. Look forward to see what they come up with.

Have had to call Newcastle Enforcement again to get bailiff action put on hold again.

 

Skiton

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Can anyone help.

Sent Non Compliance letter giving 7 days to provide info and had no reply. Does anyone know of the type of court order I need to get, in order to force the CSA to comply.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...