Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

welcome secured loan sold to coast


carnalpleasureuk
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2108 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok ive done the experian report and its still there under welcome saying we defaulted on 25/1/11, they even have my name wrong!!!

 

As for there being a shortfall thats a definate as we owe more on our mortgage than the house is worth and they have first charge.

 

So thanks for the help so far but what do think should be my course of action now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok then this is what i would do but wait for some more comments

 

contact the official receiver who handled your bankrupcy and confirm he has no interest in the house

 

IF NOT THEN THE HOUSE IS ALL YOURS

 

ANY DEBT UP TO THE BANKRUPCY FROM WELCOME WILL BE IRRELEVANT AND A NO-GOER

 

then send incasso a copy of your bankrupcy and number and tell them to contact the official receiver

 

with the state welcome is in at the moment, you may get a pleasent surprise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ime now going from my brothers own bankruptcy

 

the official receiver made him sell his house but years later various dca etc came out the wood work that were not included in the bankruptcy.

 

The official receiver told him to send a copy of the bankruptcy order to the dca and to contact the receiver if needed.

 

Just because its not listed in the petition does not mean they are not included.

All financial obligations are included as the receiver does a name search to confirm this

 

it will be down to incasso to disprove this, not you

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry sequenci, I dont understand what you mean?

 

Ok post ill contact the receiver on monday to find out update when i know, hopefully you ll be around at some point to advise firther if need be?

Edited by carnalpleasureuk
Link to post
Share on other sites

If Welcome tried to repossess the property any shortfall would disappear due to the bankruptcy. This means that their best interests are to keep things as they are. This is likely to be why they haven't tried to bring proceedings to repossess the property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i understand what you are saying about the shortfall and about why they havent tried to reposess,

 

Where does that leave me now as regards what you think i should do as i havent paid or had any contact with them since the bankcruptcy. So they arent getting anything anyway.

 

Im going to contact the receiver on monday like postggj suggested and report back my findings for further advice. do you think this is best course of action for now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Hope you dont mind me butting in.

Has anyone checked tha agreement yet.

Welcome are notorious for getting there sums wrong in the TCC department.

 

Assuming this is a second charge under 25k of course

 

If it is defective it would release the charge under section 106 not sure how it would effect the debt under the bancrupcy though.

Still worth having a look

 

Peter

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

And no all advice welcome peter.

Its been so long since any contact with welcome(til recently) and cant seem to find the paperwork, so no one has had a chance to check anything.

 

My main concern til now has been what to do for now as was contacted with default notice by welcome and letter from Incasso demanding full payment in 7 days which has passed now.

 

It was a second charge and think it was for around 20k.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

And no all advice welcome peter.

Its been so long since any contact with welcome(til recently) and cant seem to find the paperwork, so no one has had a chance to check anything.

 

My main concern til now has been what to do for now as was contacted with default notice by welcome and letter from Incasso demanding full payment in 7 days which has passed now.

 

It was a second charge and think it was for around 20k.

 

I would put in a CCA request under section 77 of the 1974 Consunmer credit act it will cost you £1 they should respond within 12 days their is a template on here.

 

Better if you could locate your orriginal and post it on here.

 

I thnk it is reasonable to sugget that you must be able to check the validity of the sums requested particularily if it has been so long since you signed the agreement.

 

I would tel them this and that you are awaiting documentaion requested under the above in order to verify the debt and untill this is recieved they should consider the debt to be in dispute.

Also add that they should refrain from any further action untill this is resolved.

 

You can quote the relevant OFT guidlines if it comes to it, but i think as said, a reasonable request and if you dont need to get heavy, i dont think it is always the best approach.

 

Peter

.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I need to send that to Incasso as their letter states all correspondance to go to them?

 

Yes i would send it recorded. Are they the legal owners of the debt ? Or are they a DCA i am not familliar with the name.

It doesnt really matter as far as the request is concerned as they are obliged to pass it on to whoever is the creditor by the act.

 

Pete

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

as in post 21 time to ignore them.

the receiver has no int in the house

incasso aer just chancing their arm they can fleece you

the debt is well statute barred

 

i'd SAR welcome

get the info on payments..

 

maybe do some reclaiming too.

 

poss be that the default was registered after the SB date too

if thats the case it must be removed.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...