Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DVLA : Is it time for a Sorn ?


London000
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4765 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning.

I have a really quick question...

If the road tax is expriring how long do you have after the expiration until you have to tax it again? Is it a week??? Or is it necesary to do it strght away...

Could I keep it on private land for let's say a week and then tax it from the day expired???

 

Many thanks,

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say, strictly legally, no, but in the real world, a week ( but no more ) would probally be ok, so long as you do not use the vehicle on the road and the retax is from the "expiry" date. Even the hounds of hell from DVLA wouldnt work that quickly.

 

Technically, there is officially no leeway on date of expiry to date of retax/declaration of SORN

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no official leaway from your expiry of the old disk until you display your new one. Whilst you may "get away with it" for a few days, just bear in mind that if you get caught thy can bring a mountain of fines down on you.

 

Fine 1 - Failure to display

Fine 2 - Using a untaxed vehicle on the public road

Fine 3 - Vehicle seized, with associated costs/fines of surity (until taxed) plus towing/storage fees.

 

The only official exception is where you have taxed it online within the last few days of the month. In these circumstances you are allowed to carry on using the vehicle for the first 5 days to allow for postage of your new disk.

Edited by crem
Link to post
Share on other sites

The legislation actually allows 28 days between expiry and a SORN application look it up your self. The DVLA and their cohotrs may tell you different.

 

The DVLA cannot fine you they apply a penalty charge that can only be recovered through the courts.

 

It is not a "fine" only the courts can Fine you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The requirement is that a mechanically propelled vehicle registered under the Vehicles Excise & Registration Act 1994 is licensed. - s.1 of the Act.

There is no grace period for that, there is a 5 day 'grace' period for displaying the licence if a new one is applied for by phone or on-line before the old licence or SORN declaration expires.

 

If the vehicle is not used or kept on a public road a declaration under s.22 (1D) of the same act (SORN) may be made instead of a licence, there is no 'grace' period or 28 days allowance for a SORN declaration. A new licence must be taken out, or SORN declaration made on or before the expiry of the old licence or SORN declaration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

These regulations are made under powers in section 7A of the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994, as amended by the Finance Act 2002. The amendments cover continuous registration and the power to enforce directly from the record, and create a new criminal offence of being the registered keeper of an unlicensed vehicle. They give specific powers to the Secretary of State to levy an automatic supplement on those keepers who fail to license their vehicles on time.

 

The regulations set the level of the new penalty for those who are served with notices following their failure to license their vehicles on time, or to make a statutory off-road notification if they intend to take a vehicle off the road. The proposed penalty is £80, reduced to £40 if paid within 28 days of the notice being served. That penalty will apply if a keeper fails to license a vehicle or to make a statutory off-road notification within a month of the expiry of the previous licence or statutory off-road notification.

 

The regulations also prescribe that the registered keeper of the vehicle shall be liable to pay the penalty.

 

This is taken directly from the explanatory notes to parliament.

Edited by Big Bill
added last para
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Late Licensing Penalty - s.7A Vehicles Excise & Registration Act 1994 - is £80, reduced to £40 if paid within 28 days of the Late Licence Penalty notice being served.

 

The offence of being the registered keeper of an un-licensed vehicle - s.31A, Vehicles Excise & Registration Act 1994 - is committed if a new licence is not obtained, or SORN declaration made, on or before expiry of the old one - there is no time allowance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Bill im sure an Affidavit of truth sworn in front of an officer for the courts along with a Dunn & Bradstreet print off showing a "registered" company trading for PROFIT along with a copy of formal notice to DVLA stating you "conditionally£ accept the fee asked of you providing DVLA swears under penalty of perjury on their full commercial liability that THEY ARE NOT a company trading for profit. Will you then pay them what they ask. Dont expect them to accept this for they wont. Bottom line.... You now have lawful excuse as stated in the rd traffic act. Laqful excuse because the party requesting of you refuses to sacrifice the "MEASURE OF THEIR CREDIBILITY" !!!

Legal Maxim: He who does not sacrifice the measure of the credibility has no claim cannot claim injury and have no claim of Athority.

So where does that leave us.....

NO ONE RULE IF NO ONE OBEYS8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks,

 

It has been sorted somehow a while ago.

I must thank you for all the answers received although there is too much info to take in....

Why can't we have a pure and simple laws to little things like that....

I am still finding myself puzzled by the fact that exactly how many days after the roadtax expired anyone is entitled to until the next one is displayed...

What I am trying to say is that when you have paid for the new roadtax you could backdate it from the time when the expired one ended...so in all you will still be ok?!

 

DD:roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

In theory, a new licence must be taken out on or before expiry of the old one. There is a 5 days grace for displaying the new one if it is ordered by phone or on line - as long as it was ordered before expiry of the old one.

 

In practice, if you are a few days late and the new one runs from the expiry of the old one, I don't think DVLA worry too much, but failure to display could cause problems, depending on the circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...