Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hot news for anyone who has suffered mortgage arrears charges, irresponsible lending or other unfair lender conduct


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4592 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml

 

 

It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.

 

Furthermore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.

 

Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.

 

You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.

 

Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.

We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.

 

It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.

 

You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.

 

However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.

 

Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.

 

If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.

 

You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.

 

You must not make any complain through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.

You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

 

but what about mortgages non regulated i.e over 25K ??? I thought that the CCA 2006 was retrospective on unfair terms and treatment of customers regardless of regulated on non regulated, thought I saw a thread also on that?

Edited by maybelline
wrong year for regs oops??

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

maybelline please stay calm - do not accept the answer of the fos - say you want it looked

at again - these things take time so be prepared. Go to CAB - are you eligible for legal aid

you probably are and a good specialist law firm will help. Make a payment proposal for the

arrears 50 pounds on top of your normal insatlment should do it. Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

already asked fos to look again, they still say same, then cant go above them to independent if you just 'disagree with their findngs' its a shambles, folk have NO WHERE to go when they get shafted by the likes of GE, the govt removed the funding for legal help, have you tried the cls, talk to you over the phone, thats it!! how is that any help, i had to correct them, some of the stuff they advised was just wrong, its a mess, lots of people are gonna be losing their homes thanks to the govt, and the banks and financial institutions that are just robbing me of my money, they had their money but want me to pay till i die

 

yeah not calm very angry

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a level of unfairness that is becoming totally apparent - it wont be long

before the dam breaks because the banks have really torn it this time

however back to you how far down the repossession track are you.

 

please explain do you only have the one mortgage on the property?

really if you own one property and are not bringing in much money then

legal aid is possible. On what grounds are you denied it.

 

Also put your home up for sale yourself and take control of this situation.

I know that you are in hell right now - but calm down and accept that

you will have to help yourself. Please state arrears amount if it is 2 to 3

thousand you can offer 50 per month. It all depends how long you have

been paying - how long is left. Is it interest or repayment.

 

Get it all out here you have nothing to lose and more heads are better

than one. STAY CALM AND PRAY FOR CLARITY AND TO KEEP YOUR

HEAD. There is a way !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks, so tired of it all now, -

i have tried veryhard to deal with this unlawful pratices and so on but truth is that legal aid is not about the income you have but also if you can demonstrate your strength of case, using a barrister of course, whowants paying of course, cos the folk deciding the strenght of your case is not your solicitor but the jolly old folk at legal aid office, so much for rights, believe it is complex, it is all about the lenders, look at securitisation, secret commissions, the ordianry person has no chance, like i said, thousands put out of their homes to these vultures. i accept your advice.

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly banging on about unlawful practices is getting us all

nowhere. The main thing is to deal with your own situation.

If there is a way to communicate privately I am happy to talk

you through a systematic course through this. Your biggest

problem right now is your high anxiety - see the doc if you must

but there are actions you must do nice and steady - IT IS

DO-ABLE

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS make sure you have a good breakfast and 8 hours

sleep - you need to be fit for this, If you are drained then

nap to catch up on the lost rest through adrenal exhaustion.

See it as happening to someone else it helps to keep

the mind thinking clearly

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybelline,

 

You haven't been back to your other thread. Have you got your papers together? You must do your defence for tomorrow or you will get repossessed and probably be given two weeks to move out of your home. Have you done your N244? You can download it from the internet if you haven't already.

 

You can't just go along and moan about them, you must have all your evidence to present to the judge, and your statement must say that this why you have stopped payments, if that is the reason.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry, been on the PM side of it:) yes got my paperwork sorted, will update tomorrow.

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Maybelline - I always thought that a repo action from a lender was answered on a form N11M that is sent for defence purposes - at least that is what I had to deal with when GMAC took us into court - (repo suspended) - we went to court and asked the DJ for an adjournment in order to get our full defence in place and legal aid etc - i certainly didnt pay a fee as it was the lenders action not mine - I note that others have mentioned the N244 - does anyone know the definitive answer please??? Good Luck for tomorrow - it sounds like you have had very little notice and cannot see any reason why you would be forced to defend it all right now - that would go against the CPR and the courts remit etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The N11M defence form is used to respond to a claim for possession and is included in the pack sent out from the court advising of the date of the repossession hearing (this is the first stage of repo action)

If you are responding on an N11M you can state your case at section 27 of the form - i.e. give your reasons why possession should not be granted to the lender i.e. your offer to pay arrears in installments, or ask for an adjournement pending receipt of further information vital to your defence.

 

However, if you have already had a repossession hearing and a suspended possession order was granted but you fail to pay in accordance with the order, then the lender may apply for an eviction warrant. In that case an N244 is used to request a hearing in front of a judge to have the eviction stopped.You state your case in section 10 of the form.

 

(N244 is also used to ask for a hearing for other debt related cases i.e. set-aside of CCJ etc)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ellen your pm is full i think? can you clear?

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

ellen your pm is full i think? can you clear?
sorry my mistake

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hi We are have just sent the LBA off to acenden and now preparing the court papers.On the p.o.c part 6.The defendent,s also levied further interest upon the said unlawful charges of £*****.Do i mention the interest on arrears charges in this bit? regards angnnig

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...