Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Credit/Debit Processing Fees - Which? Super Complaint to the OFT


Michael Browne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4816 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Stop 'rip off' charges Pledge your support

 

Which? is issuing a super complaint to the Office of Fair Trading over the fees retailers charge consumers for paying by credit or debit card. Low cost airlines are amongst the worst offenders. We want upfront costs, fair charges and for retailers to absorb the cost of the fee to process a debit card payment.

 

Add your name to our pledge. Please ask your friends and family to do the same. The more support we have, the stronger our case.

 

Pledge your support here:

http://www.which.co.uk/campaigns/personal-finance/card-surcharges/pledge-your-support/

 

 

 

Consumers are increasingly facing high fees – known as surcharges – when purchasing goods and services when paying by credit and debit cards.

 

Which? accept that retailers face some costs when processing card payments. However, these charges are usually above and beyond what it costs the retailer. We think this is unfair so we're issuing a super complaint to the Office of Fair Trading (OFT).

 

Low-cost airlines are among the worst offenders, with some charging a fee per passenger, per leg of the journey, in spite of the fact that they only have to process one transaction.

 

What is the real cost of using different cards and payment methods?

When paying by debit card, the retailer pays pence not pounds to process the payment. A fairer cost would be 10-20p.

 

The cost of a credit card charge to a retailer is calculated as a percentage of the value. We think the real cost of processing a credit card transaction is no more than two percent of the value of the purchase. Retailers often charge a fixed value – so you could end paying more than the true cost.

Read more: http://www.which.co.uk/campaigns/personal-finance/card-surcharges/about-the-surcharge-super-complaint/
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sneaky' card charges to face OFT probe

 

 

11 February 2011

Sneaky charges imposed by budget airlines and other companies for card payments may be outlawed after a 'super-complaint' by consumer group Which?

 

Transaction booking fees are defended by companies, like Ryanair and other budget airlines, due to the administration fee associated with the cost of booking.

 

However, Which? argues that the cost of processing a payment is a fraction of the transaction fee imposed on customers.

The consumer group said that on average it costs 20p per debit card payment and no more than 2% of the total value for a credit card transaction.

Which? claims that low-cost airlines are among the worst offenders, with some charging a fee per passenger, per leg of the journey, in spite of the fact they only have to process one transaction.

 

Read more: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/bargains-and-rip-offs/article.html?in_article_id=522706&in_page_id=5#ixzz1DeKyUemq

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello all,

 

Thanks for your support! I work for Which? and we've been so pleased with the reaction to this campaign - it seems most people have noticed these charges and want to do something about it. If you haven't pledged yet, please click on the link in the OP - the more support we receive the more likely we are to make a difference.

 

For those who have pledged - just wanted to say a HUGE thank you! We've had over 8000 people sign the pledge so far, which just goes to show that these charges have been annoying people (including me - I always try and get the cheapest flights possible!) for far too long.

 

Nikki Whiteman (WhichAction - we're the online campaigning arm of Which?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having never been on a plane in my life this is not something I have come across. However, after reading up on it I signed the pledge. This sort of unscrupulous behaviour should be fought wherever it is found!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...