Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
    • Thanks for your interest dx100. Didn’t reach a hearing. Although they filed court papers, they withdrew a few days beforehand, and admitted it was statute barred and I have it in writing that they say the matter is now closed. Once again, many thanks for all your help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

claiming jsa but offered work - happyhamr other half


happyhamr
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4800 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I am currently claiming JSA and have been offered a part time job on a 6 week contract.

The hours are 18.45 per week.

 

Do i need to sign off of JSA ?

 

Any advice would be helpfull.

 

Thanks

 

hammies other half:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you take that job on those hours, then yes you will need to sign off JSA. You can work up to, but not including 16 hours a week. The week in question is based on your signing day, so if you sign on a thursday, your week runs thursday to wednesday.

 

If you are a single parent, then this probably makes good sense. and working extra hours above this will probably not benefit you much, especially if you have child care costs.

 

However, if you want to work full time, are on contribution based JSA and do not have a claim for housing benefit / council tax benefit and your new employer is able to be flexible then ask if you are able to do 15.5 hours a week, as then you will be able to sign on. You will have to continue to look for full time work, and sign on etc.. They cannot sanction you for this because you are signing on looking for full time work and the job was for less than 30 hours a week, and you are showing your willingness to work whilst looking for a full time job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any work you do has to be declared, you can work as Ptol says, up to and including 15hrs and 59 minutes in one benefit week. Any earnings you get will reduce your JSA pound for pound after a small disregard (£5 for single people without dependants £10 for couples and £20 for couple parents or single parents etc).

 

Your benefit week does depend on your signing day, the example Ptol gave is the wrong way round, as JSA is paid fortnightly in arrears, your benefit week ends on your signing day so the example given is if you sign on a Thursday, your benefit week runs from Friday to Thursday.

 

If you work 16hrs or more in a benefit week, then the rules are that you are working too many hours to qualify for JSA, if you are a lone parent, disabled or have disabled children then working tax credits may be an option to top up your earnings however that again depends on the hours worked and personal circumstances, you would be well advised to check out what you may or may not be entitled to on the benefits website on www.direct.gov.uk.

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your benefit week does depend on your signing day, the example Ptol gave is the wrong way round, as JSA is paid fortnightly in arrears, your benefit week ends on your signing day so the example given is if you sign on a Thursday, your benefit week runs from Friday to Thursday.

That is not right, in that situation if you sign on at thursday 10am, you would be asked to declare that you have not worked that afternoon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry but the information I have given is correct, your signing day is denoted by the last two numbers in your national insurance number and the signing day you are asigned is the last day of the benefit week. If you sign on Monday, your benefit week runs from Tuesday to Monday and so on.

 

When you sign your fortnightly declaration you are saying that you havent done any undeclared work and have been actively seeking work during that fortnight. Your declaration implies that this also includes all of your signing day.

 

The only instance where you may sign for a different period of time on a different day is if there are too many people in your area with the same last two digits in their national insurance number. In that instance you will for example sign on a Wednesday to declare no undeclared work done and that you were actively seeking work for a fortnight ending on the Monday or Tuesday but this is very rare and usually only done for a short period of time as soon as a spot on your correct signing day becomes available.

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The source of the information was the "Back to work" meeting I attended earlier this week. As part of that meeting they go through what is required of you, and they spent 5 minutes on the signing part, and what you are signing to say.

 

However, it is not possible to sign at 10 in the morning declaring that you have not done any work later that afternoon. I agree for many JSA claimants that is not particularly likely but in the case of people who are company directors, it is quite possible that an event occurs later that day that requires you to work for 30 minutes, and that would put you in conflict with the declaration that you had already made. that cannot be right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can assure you that I have given the correct information, for people who have the opportunity to work on their signing days, they still have to declare any work done or are expecting to do on that day as well as the last 13 days. The B7 declaration forms they complete shows the hours and earnings worked and earned in that benefit week and the one before it. They are averaged and this is then applied to the next fortnight, when the actual wageslips are recieved they are checked for accuracy and adjustments made for weeks in the future so anything missed is captured eventually.

 

I base my information on 11 years experience working with Jobseekers.

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not work in a Jobcentre. My experience comes from supporting Jobseekers and advising them in an official capacity I therefore have to have a good knowledge of how claims are made up and what the regulations are.

 

I suggest you speak to your advisor again when you next attend and just get them to confirm that your signing day is the last day of your benefit week.

 

People who make threads on here asking for help need accurate information and I wouldnt post unless I knew that the information I was giving was based in fact.

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the information. I am even more confused now. I will speak to the employer on Monday to see if they can be more flexible with my hours.

 

Thanks again

 

Happyhmr other half.

 

 

I am sorry for your confusion, to be honest as the contract you would have is for 6 weeks and is for more than 15hrs and 59 mins a week it is a moot point. The hours are over the limit and its for six weeks so under those circumstances, yes you would have to sign off.

 

If your employer wanted to reduce the hours to below the limit then obviously you would have to sort out your benefit weeks, declare wages etc.

 

People who post information on here do it with the best intentions but sometimes are not armed with the correct information, it is always best to see a consensus of replies or contacting the jobcentre direct before making decisions based on it but I can catagorically confirm that your benefit week ends on the day that you sign on.

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya,

 

I agree with Monx, the confusion we caused was very much a side show and regrettable. If your hours are identical each week, then the exact day your benefit week is calculated really would not matter.

 

As always on the internet, it is you, the reader who has to decide who and what advice you wish to follow if you indeed do follow it, and in this case, both of us have stated where our information is coming from which should help you understand its risks. There is a difference, and whilst I am certain of what I was told in the back to work session on Monday by job centre staff this week, Monx is just as certain too. You can be certain of one thing, One or both of us has been misinformed.

 

All the best, Ptol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks for all your advise.

 

I have another query, I started work 2 weeks ago and I am doing 15.45 hours per week.

I have just been to Jobcentrre to sign on and to see an advisor as i have been signing on for more than 13 weeks.

 

My net pay is £112.40 per week and I have just phoned jobseekers allowance number to find out what deductions will be taken out.

 

They stated that as I am earining £112.00 per week that my jsa will be deducted from this amount.In other words THEY will be paying nothing.

 

Why is it they say you can work less than 16 hours and they then stop the money.?

 

My travel is costing me £30.00 per week and once this amount is paid out I am actualy working for £3.50 per day, What is the point. Apart from them wanting you not to sign on it is very misleading stating that you can work for 16.00 per week but they then stop your jsa.(65.45 per weeek)

Although they have given me the form for travel reductions I have still had to pay this out for the last 2and half wweeks.

 

Is this the correct information that i have been given?

 

If it is I might as well not go to work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi happyhamr here:-)

just wanted to clear up , "little confusion".

 

my girlfriend got the job , originally for 18 hours 45 minutes , but came to an agreement to work 15 hours 45 minutes so that she would be under the16 hours a week limit:-)(hope this clarifies)

as she says is it worth her going to work:roll:

 

£112.40 - £64,40(jsa)-£30.00(travel) =£18 pound a week, "whats the point":roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats the point indeed...., I did a few days IT Contract work and had to notify the JC and yes its not worth it financially, I only did it for a few days and it was worth it to put a bit more experience on my CV, of course the new coalition government has promised to always make sure that any work pay but the figures they give are only a tiny improvement on the current system,. I assume though that if you worked for less than 16 hourts and still signed on you would still be elligible for some other benefits even if your JSA was cut. (Mortgage help, Council tax, etc)

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any work you do has to be declared, you can work as Ptol says, up to and including 15hrs and 59 minutes in one benefit week. Any earnings you get will reduce your JSA pound for pound after a small disregard (£5 for single people without dependants £10 for couples and £20 for couple parents or single parents etc).

 

[/url].

 

I did say this in my first post, wages are taken into consideration pound for pound after the small disregard (dependant on circumstances). The reason why you need to be working less than 16hrs per week is to keep your claim live and to accrue your national insurance credits as you are not earning enough to pay them through your wages.

 

Housing benefit and tax credits can also be paid if you are on what is considered a low wage.

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...