Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Honest opinon needed please


bp
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6432 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I've asked this elsewhere but no answer.

 

On Fri, i was played a recording of my loan application in Jan. This is after i complained that i was missold my PPI.

 

In all of the 20mins recording, i am not told i HAVE to take out PPI in order to qualify for the loan (Yet i am certain i was told this). the other strange thing is , the conversation goes from her recommending PPI, explaining its benefit and then telling me how much it comes to per month, the APR and the fact that it includes PPI. At no point am i asked "do you want PPI?" nor is there a direct agreement from me stating that i am going to purchase PPI.

 

The conversation ends with "we'll send you out the agreement, please read it carefully and make sure you tick box 4 and 5 for the PPI or it will delay your application"

My question is , IS IT POSSIBLE THAT PART OF THE CONVERSATION WAS REMOVED?

 

I need to know this because i have to write to my bank and send some kind of appropriate answer after listening to the recording.

 

Am i barking up the wrong tree here?

 

Please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for quick reply, even when i heard the PPI part of the recording, it just felt weird as if something was missing.

 

And Yes, to anyone else out there, i KNOW i've spelt opinion wrong!

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless they give you an original copy, then it's not proof of what happened as it could have been docotored. Unfortunately, you'll probably never know what is an original and what is a copy. However, I'd say IMHO that if there's nothing saying 'do you want PPI' then you never bought it.

BoS:- D P A sent 09/06 Prelim. request 29/06 £1755 plus interest

1st claim Filed 5/10/06 SETTLED 19/10 £747.80 plus £534.31 interest

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got your copy of the loan agreement? If so, have a look and see if the PPI premium was added before the interest calculation. If so, you have them by the sphericals.

 

As they have refused to supply you with a copy of the conversation, perhaps you could ask them to play it again and record it at your end. From the way you describe it, it sounds fishy. For example, why would failure to tick boxes 4 and 5 delay your application???

 

Elsinore

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi elsinore, The loan reads:

 

Amount of loan:£7000.00

Amount of payment protection insurance premium:£1652.42

Total amount we are lending you:£8652.42

Period for which this agreement lasts:48

 

It then goes on to tell me the total amount for the loan, for payment protection and the full total i must pay.

oh, and the interest on the payment protection is £618.94

 

Are they not meant to add the premium before interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry elsinore, forgot to answer your other question. Box 4 and 5 were for the PPI and when i received the agreement, i forgot to sign that section by mistake. A few days later, they contacted me and said that the agreement was back on its way to me because i hadn't completed all sections and that once they were signed, the money would be transferred into my account.

 

I have also asked for a copy of the letter they sent to me when they realised i hadn't signed all the bits and they've refused saying that it was just a standard letter.

 

Also, having looked at the letter they sent confirming the approval of my loan, they have re-enforced the importance of PPI by stating "tick the box indicating you wish to purchase PPI and sign again next to the tick box"

 

I mean, if this is not pressure to purchase PPI, what is?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are obliged, under the DPA, to provide a copy of the recording, or a transcript. I'm not sure if playing it down the phone meets the DPA requirements, so I would investigate whether, if you made a formal DPA SAR you could obtain a tape or CD of the call. I would also ask them to provide details as to the exact time of the start, and end of the call, and then compare these details, and the length of the recording, to the call details on your phone bill, if you have it.

 

I don't believe they would edit the call in all honesty. Certainly the bank I work for would not even have the facility to do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...