NoToMob: Fighting revenue driven enforcement

[Esinem]

We are a campaign group dedicated to regaining the voice of the individual.

 

Initially we are taking on the so called parking “industry” but our remit will not stop there.

 

We want to open the public's eyes to the likes of the oppression we have already encountered at local and central government level, and will explore in an open forum any lawful ways of fighting oppression, greed and corruption at all levels of business and government.

 

We will do this by direct action.

 

We need an army of volunteers, armchair or otherwise, to join us and stand as one to simply say ENOUGH!

 

People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.

 

 

 

Here is one recent exposing underhand revenue driven tactics, that will save motorists up to £500,000 per annum in fines for complying with the law!

Edited January 18, 2011 by Esinem
removed wording subject to misinterpretation

[MARTIN3030]

This site is in favour of pro active campaign and discussions against those who flout or deny consumers rights.

However,we cannot embrace nor be supportive of or to,any measures or actions that are unlawful,or can be seen to be promoting civil disobedience that could give rise to prosecution.

Additionally,please read site posting rules on links.

Thanks for your understanding.

[Esinem]

All our actions are entirely within the law, unlike the bodies we oppose. However, we will lawfully and peacefully resist those who attempt to apply their own rules without legal sanction. I have removed the reference "civil disobedience" to avoid any confusion with any unlawful or violent action. This is not, nor has ever been, part of our remit and we have always retained to high moral ground. In fact, we have had tremendous support from the Metropolitan Police for our volunteers assistance to ensure that council CCTV cars are acting as a "visible deterrent" and contributing to the statutory aim of "100% compliance without penalties", rather than robbing motorists at the expense of road safety.

 

I have checked the rules re links and I can't see a problem. I am not the owner of the site, nor is it commercial/profit making nor does it contain/refer to any banned material. Please let me know if there's anything I missed.

Edited January 18, 2011 by Esinem

[MARTIN3030]

Ok thanks for clarifying that.

 

If you believe your links and logos should be allowed then feel free to request this from [email protected]

 

In the absence of any permissions meantime,links and images with associated links,will be unapproved.

 

Thanks for understanding-but these are the site rules.

[Esinem]

Wilco!