Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sky multiroom and telephone line - worried about engineer's remark.


ErikaPNP
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4689 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Finally have my sky fixed, and got multiroom installed. Just a query about something the engineer did. He appeared extremely stressed and kept whining about having no time because he had a lot of booked jobs and that he had to cancel a few already. One of the things he had "no time" for was to properly fit a cable to my main telephone line; i.e tidily tack it along the walls of my house.

 

So, to set up the sky box in the kids room, he had a line running from the bedroom, down the stairs, over the lower banister and across the hall floor (loosely) to plug it into my telephone line. I said to him I wasn't happy about that because it was a severe trip hazard in three places - I don't fancy me or my kids taking a tumble down the stairs.

 

He said not to worry about it because once he'd installed it, he'd unplug that line and I could put it away behind the TV, and I'd only ever need to plug it back in if sky asked questions. He said as long as the line from the box in my living room remained plugged in (which isn't a problem as it's neatly installed), it wouldn't be an issue.

 

I don't know but that doesn't sit right with me, particulary as he mentioned Sky "asking questions". I didn't have it plugged in when I had the one Sky box, but I hear for multiroom that both the boxes need to be plugged in at all times.

 

Can someone please clarify - is he taking me for a ride? I don't want to end up with either the kids losing their viewing or me being slapped with charges because he had accepted more jobs than he could cope with and as a result, didn't have the time to fit the telephone line properly. If he is trying to pull a fast one, what should I do? Phone Sky and tell them?

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you signed a contracct with sky and as a result they have to honour their part of the contract

 

it is unexceptable that you have wires hanging loose with kids, do your own risk assesmant and call sky back.

 

be polite to begin with but use the stick of breach of contract and request an engineer to come back and do the job to your satisfaction.

 

i believe sky sub contract installs

 

does not ell-enn work for sky

 

send her a pm

Link to post
Share on other sites

does not ell-enn work for sky

 

send her a pm

 

Could be IdaInFife :wink:

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't have our second box plugged into a phone, and that's a multi-room subscription.

Just means i can't go interactive but that doesn't bother me.

 

They only use it to check up on how you use it in case you've had box office movies, pay per view

sports etc and they would go through your main box anyway so i wouldn't worry bout that part of it

However if you are worried that someone has not done a job that they have been paid to do

(and phonelines aren't part of the installation unless you've paid extra for it) then get them back in to

do the job properly

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had exactly the same thing happen with us regarding a straight forward installation. The guy slung the cable over the apex of the roof, tacked it onto the wall with some cheap cable staples. I took pictures of the work and sent them to a sky email address i got off CAG complaining about poor workmanship and insisted I would only accept a fully trained engineer employed by Sky to resolve the issue.

I got contacted by Sky within 24 hours and one of their engineers came around who stated that he had never seen such shoddy workmanship. He re-routed the cable through the ceiling without the need to staple down the cable. Also had to adjust the dish due to signal not being maximum strength. Sky then gave us 3 months free subscription.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought it was so sky could keep eye on where other box and sky card were cos you colld pay multiroom and then set it up in someone elses house.

 

See - that's what I have heard, and is what worries me. It's unplugged at the moment - he took it out before he left, as it couldn't be left the way it was, it was downright dangerous. It was agreed over the phone, and I was informed that I'd need a phone line for the installation; I advised the gent at the time there was no phone line in the bedroom and he said that the engineer would see to all of that - but he hasn't! I don't need a new socket installed, just needed the cables fitted properly.

 

So I'm not sure if it is just that I need the line for installation only or if what I have heard is correct.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tHE GUY THAT FITTED MINE SAID BOTH BOXES NEEDED PHONE LINE COS I COULD TAKE ONE BOX AND ONE CARD UP THE ROAD AND SHARE COST OF MULTIROOM WHICH IS A LOT LESS THAN TWO SUBSCRIPTIONS AND TO STOP THIS HAPPENING SKY COULD MONITOR IT BY HAVING BOTH BOXES PLUGGED IN TO TELEPHONE LINE. I HAVE HEARD OTHERS SAY THIS IS NOT RIGHT . BUT I THINK THAT MAKES SENSE OTHER WISE ITS OPEN TO ABUSE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got multiroom and the box in my son's bedroom hasn't been plugged into the phone line since the day after it was installed - 3 years ago! (only because the phone point is on the wrong side of the bedroom) Sky have never asked about it :)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've found terms and conditions on the back of the letter they sent with my new viewing card; it says both lines have to be connected. So rang Sky about it and spoke to a lovely lady who is absolutely horrified at what the engineer did. I informed her that when I agreed to the multiroom, I made clear on the phone when the telephone line was mentioned, that my children's room did not have a phone socket and was told that the engineer would see to all of that for me.

 

The woman I spoke to just now has advised that they (Sky) do monthly call backs from the box to check that it is installed in my home - she exlpained that it's basically a measure to stop fraud because multiroom get discounted subscriptions, but if the box isn't connected it could be the case that someone else is using it and getting a full sub for next to nothing. If a call back is done and it's found that my box isn't connected, they can either terminate my multiroom with 7 days notice or charge me full subs for both boxes (eek!).

 

She said it's unacceptable what the engineer did and that he should never have left me in that position. She's contacting the engineer's team manager about it, and will arrange for another engineer to finish the job properly. She's going to give me a ring back with a date for this to be done. I explained that due to work I cannot be home during the day except weekends so she said she'll place a note on my account about the problem so that if they do a call back, they'll see that I haven't deliberately removed the line from the socket.

 

She was an absolute star.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there a quite a few threads in here about the extra charges:

 

for multiroom:

 

sky send a message to all your viewing cards once a month via the phone line - if the viewing card does not respond i.e. if line is not connected then with the terms and conditions of multiroom you argree to pay the full price of subs for EACH box.

 

 

so yes Erika it was better to get it sorted now than later.

 

sometimes the system can delay in picking up missed callbacks from your viewing cards but they eventually will catch up

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Ida. I've had Sky back on the phone. The lady said the engineers company would call me directly, which they now have - they'll have an engineer round tomorrow. I felt a bit awkward raising it, because in doing so it meant that I dropped the engineer right in the deep stuff. I don't like doing that to people.

 

Five stars to Sky, though - the lady I spoke to was so helpful, and not only that but she had a really pleasant manner about her. She was genuine, not robotic like so many other companies are.

 

The engineer's company were not so customer focussed when they phoned. They weren't rude or anything, but I could almost picture her rolling her eyes as she was talking to me - if you see what I mean! Perhaps the Sky lady could give her a few tips on communication :wink:

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Great to see you got sorted out so easily ErikaPNP. Nice to see you again postggi hows the knees?

Perhaps you can answer a question for me Postggi. I have had sky since 2001 only in the main room. 2 years ago my son wanted sky in his room. I relented and phoned sky they sent an engineer put in a box for him. We did have a telephone line to it but not trusting my kids to rack up a bill with the interactive services I removed it.

 

I noticed last month that since March i have been charged £104.00 instead of usual payment to them of £62.25. I rang them to ask why and was told my sky boxes where not connected to a telephone. So i went out brought new extentions and new connectors for the boxes and rang again and they checked they were connected. They did say they had sent me 3 warning letters since January which I have never recieved. (don't know where they sending them but it's not here)

 

They told me they would fully refund me. Great. Checked this months statement and once again they have overcharged me. I rang yesterday and they say phone lines are still coming up not connected. They going to ping them again I am to ring them sometime this evening. Think this may be because we have a withheld number which apparently causes a problem.

 

My question to you postggi is this. I have never have had a multiroom contract just the engineer coming to fit box and put new cable to satalitte. In my contract that I do have from 2001 it states. Telephone line to be connected to the sky box for 12 month period. The only communication I have had off sky through the post was the additional sky card for the new box in 2009.

 

If I have never had a new contract and we have had the new multi room box for 2 years + now then they can not overcharge me because I haven't broken my contract and I am entitled to take out the telephone line from the back of the box as the 12 month period is over.

 

What do you think Postggi I know you are a wizz with contractual law your thoughts will be greatly appreiciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zodiac,

 

you do have a multiroom contract - the viewing card for the multirrom box was attached to the terms and conditions and when you insert and activate the card you agree to them.

 

This contract stiputlates that ALL boxes must be plugged in to receive the multiroom discount.

 

If it due to witheld number then you need to add prefix of 1470 into your telephone settings on the boxes.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The viewing card was on a piece of carboard and only had instructions how to insert it and activate it. Which the engineer did when he fitted the box. There were no t&c with it at all and certainly no contract which I had to sign and send back. So therefore I would say the original 2001 and one and only contract is the lawful contract.

 

This aside it just annoys me so much how Sky have such a monopoly and the billions the company earn their customer service and communication is (french word here ).Besides the multi room I haven't had any communiction from them since 2003. I am glad I don't run my business like them I would be bankrupt by now. For people who live in the sticks such as myself we have no choice but to use their service. Free view is useless to us even with the most up to date box and ariel we can only recieve 10 channels and dab radio well that's a joke 4 stations and one of them is bird song! Luckily I can get many on sky to listen to whilst I do my ironing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sky do not send out cardboard, they have always sent out cards with the activation details but the multiroom ones also have the t and c's on them. Sky do not use written contracts that need signed and haven't done so for quite some years. It's all about the viewing being attached to the activation letter and t and c's and your acceptance of them activating the card.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...