Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

cabot /morgan Claimform CITICARD-last year had a Wright Hassle SD attempt too!!


dillon21
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3233 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

cca's for what sorry?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them to whoever owns the debt, if Moorcrofts have bought it then send it to them if they are acting for Citi then send it to Citi.

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them to whoever owns the debt, if Moorcrofts have bought it then send it to them if they are acting for Citi then send it to Citi.

 

No - you send the CCA to however is demanding money from you, they are then obliged to provide it themselves if they own the account, or forward it the account owner if not.

 

With a CCA you are asking several questions.

 

(a) Does the agreement still exist?

 

(b) If it does, is it likely to be enforceable?

 

© Does this company that has shown up out of the blue demanding money actually have any authority whatsoever to collect this debt? They are obliged in law to produce an enforceable CCA, (or get it from the creditor), if they can't - tell them to sod off.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

then if the little darlins from moorcrap bother you again tell em to sod off..if they want to collect on the debt then they need to supply the paperwork...dont waste the price of the stamp just wait for 12 +2 days to be up and send them the you have failed to supply an agreement and the account is now in default letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

recevied postalorder and my letter requesting a cca back today telling me to send acca to citi cards as they will hold the information

 

Well write back to the idiots quoting

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR).

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity.

 

Remember the 12+2 working days are still running from the time of your first request, so if the time is up send the account indispute letter also. then leave the ball in there court. do not send any further letters until the comply or issue court papers, which is hardly unlikely

Link to post
Share on other sites

recevied postalorder and my letter requesting a cca back today telling me to send acca to citi cards as they will hold the information

 

Not an uncommon reaction from a DCA in trying to avoid their responsibilies and pass the buck.

 

Send it back to Moorcroft pointing out that as appointed agents for Citi, they are duty bound to forward the request to Citi and is in fact their legal responsibility to do so.

 

They have 12 + 2 days, (from when they 1st received your request), to produce the documents. When that period expires forward the Account in Dispute letter.

 

What it boils down to is, if they can't produce an enforceable CCA, then they have no standing to demand money from you.

 

In my own case, on various accounts I have dealt with and got rid of Moorcroft on three occassions. Frankly they're pratts.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

THe 12+2 days is up so now do i send the in dipute letter even thou they have sent everything back to me also had the same thing from rw is there a template for a accont in dispute letter

 

There you go

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/571-failiure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale

Link to post
Share on other sites

THe 12+2 days is up so now do i send the in dipute letter even thou they have sent everything back to me also had the same thing from rw is there a template for a accont in dispute letter

Yep, as Alf pointed out, they've run out of time and........errr options.

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

This morning i have eceived papers from Northamptom cc from cabot on behalf of morgan solicitors for a credit card amount for4985.62

 

 

i have been through this process before

 

 

but what ever i did last time was incorrect

 

 

so please can someone jog my memory of what i should do

 

 

i dont think i have sent of for ane info so

 

 

how do i stop or hold up the court process

 

 

sorry to be a bit dim for people who have helped me before

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh god this as all gone over my head and

 

i now relise why I propably got a judgement against me in Dec

 

Im way out of my depth

 

can you please tell me how to get the extension

 

do i ask the claimeant or the court

 

do I phone the claimant

 

this goes against all ive been told about engaging in conversation with them.

 

i received my papers Friday so

 

whats my first step

 

i need to acknowledge the papers

 

HELP PLEASE

 

i have already messed up once

 

and still have no idea what I did wrong

 

Please can somone help

i have not acknowledge the papers received last week

 

 

im very confused what my first step must be after losing the last case time is running out your help would be very helpful to buy n=me some more time

 

Help anyone please

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi dillon,

 

perhaps the reason you are not recieving any responses, is because you haven't given any information about the claim.

 

1st step, acknowledge the claim online.

You then have 14 days to file a defence.

Are you disputing the amount ? Do you have a copy of your credit agreement ? Who was the original Creditor ? Have you been recieving statements ?

Depending on what documents you have or have not, and previous requests will determine the next step.

 

Debs

Link to post
Share on other sites

when i ackowledge

 

 

what parts do i fill in

 

 

I have kow credit agreement

 

 

the oruginal creditor was citicard

 

 

no statements

 

 

just letters from debt recovery

 

 

i do not know how to file a defence

Link to post
Share on other sites

What debbsy said was going to be my next points. However, the fact that you haven't communicated with Cabot before getting the claim form gives you a strong defence regardless of anything else.

 

As debbsy said you need to acknowledge service and say that you will be be defending the full amount.

 

Can you please type up the particulars of claim as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...