Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Job taken whilst on maternity leave. And more issues.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4805 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I found this forum so useful when I had issues at work and won my case thanks to the info!! Thanks for that:wink:

 

Now my partner has problems. She is currently on maternity leave. In Aug last year whilst on leave, another employee of the same company said she had been promoted to Deputy Manger which is my partners position. I told her this was not allowed, and cannot be done. She spoke to her employer who told her this was a temporary thing.

 

However, there has been a new owner of the company. The other employee has now been promoted to Manager, and another girl has took the Deputy Manager/my partners job!

 

My partner now has no job to go back to! And to add more fuel to the fire has not been paid her holiday money, or received wage slips since the new owner took over.

 

The saga does not just stop there......

 

Apparently, the new owner has now ran off with the money, and the actual sale/transfer of the company did not complete! Now she is being told the old company owner is responcable for her wages and employment issues. This seems very strange to me how a person can take over a company, take the money, take on new employees and then disappear leaving the previos owner to deal with it.

 

What can she do? Her job position has been taken, she has not been paid, and now feels she cannot go back to her job of 8 years!

 

Any advise would be great!

 

Many Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yuck. This is messy - and pretty rare. I have to be honest - I am not sure that the previous owner is responsible (and it's pretty rare that I am not sure too!). Even if this is a TUPE transfer (and it isn't clear how the transfer of the company took place, so we don't know that) the legal provisions don't allow for the new owner running away with the cash! I think that it is probably correct that if the sale did not complete, then the old owner is still the owner - possibly for what it is worth, which will probably be very little if she has run off with the money! On the question of her position - then what she has been told is correct. The employer can certainly put someone in the place temporarily and if she has not yet retuurned there is no case unless she returns to no job. So the employer does have to sort that out when she is returning. Assuming there are any jobs to return to because this may well be the death knell for the company if, as I suspect, it is small (because nobody large would be stupid enough to let the new owner near the cash until after completion!). So she must take it up with the owner (what you decsribed as the previous owner - but since completion of the sale did not happen they are still the owner). God, what a mess! Do that and then come back when you have some answers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SarE, thanks for the reply. My partner does want to go back to work now, but there is nowhere for her to go. And the fact that nobody has been paid due to the new owner doing a runner, doesn't feel like she can go back with the financial issues.

 

It is a real mess!! But we really do not know what to do for the best. She loves her job, but she does not know what to do for the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the route SarEl has advised you to take is right, trying to ascertain who is responsible. Is she in an occupation that's regulated?

 

Last time we had something similar, the staff all worked together to try and resolve what was happening. Is your OH in touch with her colleagues? It sounds tough for all concerned.

 

Sadly, I don't think we heard the outcome of the other thread, which is always disappointing.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bottom line is that she must return to work - then sort it out (assuming she is due to return now - if not try to sort it out now anyway). The law is on her side, but it really is so incredibly messy so if this has bankrupted the employer it may be moot. But this isn't her problem so she must just try to do what she can - and do what she must (like return to work). See what happens, but don't leave it too long - and I think this will need legal advice because of the mess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Everyone,

 

Well, so far it appears I am being told lies on lies, and getting nowhere. My partner is owed £1500, and we need it now.

 

The story we are being told now, is that the business was taken over fraudulantly and therefore the transfer did not take place. However, according to the previous owner, she cannot take this money out of the business as she does not own it even though the transaction did not complete?? Surely this is just crap? The previous owner P45'd my partner whilst on maternity leave, (which my partner did not know about! It was hidden in some paperwork!) so says she is not responcible for the money. Is this wrongful dismissal?

 

The women who apparently frauded the solicitor, is still involved? Surely she should of been arrested?

 

I have told my partner to contact acas. Any advise would be great!!

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...