Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft chasing Lloyds loan now sold to 1st credit


intend
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1962 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks. If it was me, BB, I would probably stop paying, but fear my daughter would not sleep if it was just up in the air.

 

Will probably CCA Crabot. Do not believe sufficient proof of debt sale with a dodgy letterhead. Will tell them not paying until CCA supplied and have confirmation of debt sale direct from Lloyds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 395
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

dodgeletterhead is ok

it can be sent by the debt buyer on a copy of there paperwork

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers DX - really just annoyed they sold it and then did not write to me directly, 4 months after the sale. Never disputed the debt - Lloyds terminated the CC and I successfully reclaimed the interest they charged after termination and have paid then on the dot every month.

 

Will probably have to bite the bullet and just carry on paying . Still minded to write to them and complain, asking them to justify the sale.

 

About to look at the loan which could be much more of an issue - will summarize the situation and post up details later.

 

Thanks as ever

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now for details on the loan which is more worrying

 

Last payment made Oct 2010 - sent CCA request but unable to supply to account in dispute - various DCA involved, none successful. Notice of Assignment from Lloyds date Nov 2013 to 1st Credit. No acknowledgment to them.

 

Then out of the blue, letter last week, from 1st Credit, saying the account has been now been reassigned back to Lloyds. As yet nothing from Lloyds.

 

Should I be worried??

 

The loan has PPI on it, which I have held back claiming for( success for son-in-law on another loan and his CC) and about to try to reclaim for packaged account believe to be mis-sold (started awhile ago but health issues slowed me down a little and all was quite and the family living happliy in poverty thanks to CAG rather than the daily hassle of dealing with debt issues)

 

Any advice welcome. Is it usual for debts to be bought back like this - could they have located the agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers BB - not sure my daughter sees it quite like you, I,m not too worried as sure we can manage it. Guess will just have to wait and see what turns up. Still puzzled why they would take it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be something in the sale of the portfolio, if they fail to make a profit out of the debtor, then they flog it back to the OC.

 

As I never deal with DCA's and have always informed the OC's that I will ONLY pay them direct, some keep hold of it, others flog it on

and payments stop.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabot must be really felling those trees - another letter thanking for maintaining the repayment plan. Strange - not paid them a penny yet - all payments been to Lloyds - next due end next week - inclined to pay in a Lloyds as usual.

 

Cabot say good opportunity to update current situation and that they have a responsibility to make sure the plan is affordable and fair!! Just wanting contact I guess.

 

Well I will decide what is affrodable, as for fair, in this industry not a word I would use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't pay them a penny either!

 

If Royds are taking payments then let sleeping dogs lie IMO.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well - walked into local Lloyds branch - handed over the cash and the paying in slip - gladly accepting my coins of the realm. Lets wait and see.

 

Nothing heard from Lloyds about the loan since buy-back. Lets wait and see - ppi claim ready to go as soon as it kicks off serious, until then hope to reach SB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing heard from Lloyds about the loan since buy-back. Lets wait and see - ppi claim ready to go as soon as it kicks off serious, until then hope to reach SB.

 

Certainly, make them wish they'd never attempted to rattle your cage.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am much more confident in my dealing with all those involved in this industry.

 

It's truly shocking that until you are forced into a corner by these outfits, that we blindly accept the way they treat us,

only when we learn the rules of the game, can we beat them and turn the tables.

 

You are ALWAYS in the driving seat and ALWAYS have control, they just don't want anyone to educate themselves and learn

just how terribly we're being treated.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shakespeare's Shylock was more ethical, at least he was open and honest about his "pound of flesh"

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Another meaningless missive from Cabot, given I have continued to pay Lloyds, thanking me for maintaining my payment plan. Yes I will continue MY payment plan and ignore the assignment/sale of my debt to these sharks and I shall continue to walk up to my local branch and pay the money in cash.

 

Just noticed on the letter that it says the current creditor is MFS Portfolio Limited - a new name to me. Guess I need to check them out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did get a notice of assignment but on principle still paying Lloyds direct with no trouble. If they refuse payemnt will probably stop paying until "new" owner can prove i owe the debt.

 

I was in an agreement with them on which I never defaulted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

marlins financial services.

 

 

aka CABOT

 

 

Cabot Credit Management acquired rival Marlin Financial Group april 2014

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Hello all - not posted for a very long time - reason - waiting for the loan to become statue barred.

 

Well I believe this now to be the case

- Lloyds bought back the loan some time ago but have done nothing.

According to my records last payment was 19th July 2011 and not acknowledged debt.

Hopefully daughter and son-in-law can sleep a bit easier now.

 

Still paying the CC at £5, but will look to reduce that

- they sold it long ago but still paid them

- nothing for a couple of years so now time to action, along with reclaiming packaged fees.

 

Feel confident to go after them now the loan is statute barred.

 

Thanks to all who have helped

 

Some advice needed re loan

 

Son-in-law had PPI imposed on this loan. Given it is SB, should I put in a claim??

 

Regards

 

Intend

Link to post
Share on other sites

AFAIK, PPI is completely separate to the loan, or should be?? SO don't think there should be any harm in reclaiming it??

But wait for others to guide you first!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers BB, nice know you are still around with sound advice.

 

Like you say I would reclaim, but not for myself so have to take in wishes of daughter.

 

Lloyds still suck so likely to go after them and a packaged account reclaim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...