Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I can only speak from personal experience. But a similar thing happened to me. Seriously dented door.  I made the other insurance pay. They regarded it as a write off. Took the money, replaced the door. Never heard anything more about it.    Except clearly someone sold my details to claims company, because I got loads of calls in bad English for a few month's 
    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The Wicked Witch From Wickes!


col348
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4814 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

 

I recently purchased flooring packs from Wickes that totalled £545. I paid £460 with wickes vouchers and £85 on my Visa. I returned 3 packs yesterday, which equated to a £90 refund. The Manageress of the store would only pay me my refund in vouchers. I argued the fact that they had £85 of my 'money' on Visa and that I would only accept £85 back on my card and would accept a £5 voucher. She would not budge. After much arguments I gave up as I was loosing the will to live.

 

Does anyone know if I'm entitled to my 'money' back as opposed to vouchers? I feel they have 'stolen' my original £85 visa payment. I have no need for £90 Wickes vouchers and would like the cash back in my account.

 

Any help appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi col

 

Welcome to CAG

 

You could contact your credit card company and request a Chargeback. http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/sale-of-goods/your-rights-when-paying-by-credit-card/chargeback-on-credit-and-debit-cards/ Explain exactly whats happen and that you requested a refund to your card. Keep the vouchers safe to return later. Obviously keep £5 voucher thats yours.

 

Basically they want you to spend your money in Wickes, so stupid, it's put you off dealing with Wickes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure if you are even entitled to any sort of refund. Are they responsible for an over measurement? do they say they will refund on an over purchase or is it just goodwill that they have?

 

You need to check that out before getting too involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Conniff

 

Most retailers are happy to refund products that have been returned in a Resaleable condition, some even encourage the practise, especially DIY Stores, unless it's carpet thats been cut to size.

 

I'm not sure if you are even entitled to any sort of refund. Are they responsible for an over measurement? do they say they will refund on an over purchase or is it just goodwill that they have?

 

You need to check that out before getting too involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to all for the replies. Contacted Wickes customer services today and they said they'd try to resolve the issue. 2 hours later I received a call from the store manager (aka WWW) :-) . She basically said the till 'decides' on how customers are refunded. Pay majority with vouchers then till will only refund in vouchers. I asked if I'd paid the minority in vouchers, what would the till say then. There was a silence...... 'don't know' was the answer! In a nutshell, if the computer says no, the manager of the store cannot override this. This beggars belief!

 

Guess I'll be spending my vouchers soon! :sad:

 

Thanks again for the replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi col

 

You could ask her where it says that in there terms and conditions. It's o.k. telling you that after the facts, but where could you find that information before you purchased. They've basically made a choice that suits them, but not you the customer.

Plus these things can be overidden.

 

If you want to, you can send a Formal Letter of Complaint to Chief Executive : Geoff Cooper, heres his E-mail address [email protected]

Include as much detail as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would of thought they would (should ?) refund you perecentage wise, (i.e..if you paid 90% in vouchers and 10% cash then the refund should be the same pro-rata) would seem the fairest option to me, of course this would mean you'd still get the majority of the refund in vouchers.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Conniff here.

They don't have to refund you anything, the fact they have offered you vouchers is a goodwill gesture.

Many people are under the illusion that shops must refund you when you change your mind/buy to much. There is no such law (excluding DSR), they do it out of good will for their customers not because they have to. They could tell you to sling your hook and there is nothing you can do about it.

Take the vouchers and move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even Wickes say they will Refund products returned within a specified timescale, so it isn't a matter of goodwill. They encourage people to buy from them on that basis, it's not goodwill. The refund isn't the problem, it's the form of the Refund that is in question.

 

I agree with Conniff here.

They don't have to refund you anything, the fact they have offered you vouchers is a goodwill gesture.

Many people are under the illusion that shops must refund you when you change your mind/buy to much. There is no such law (excluding DSR), they do it out of good will for their customers not because they have to. They could tell you to sling your hook and there is nothing you can do about it.

Take the vouchers and move on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

WICKES lady is lying to you, i used to work for them.

they CAN refund to your card/cash if they so wish, what shes actually saying is she doesnt want the refund on her bottom line for affecting her profit and loss.

 

if she refunds you in vouchers it comes on a different budget, id approach head office with that information and make sure they understand shes giving you the run around.

 

granted the others are correct they DONT have to refund you, but it is their policy to do so, as with B&Q and the others.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...