Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • PCN Charge  - NTK received on 26th January for, “illegal” parking on the  Nicol Street Car Park for 11 minutes on 19th January, (having done so on the understanding that the car parks had been made free due to the COVID-19). I noticed a similar event and correspondence regarding the same car park in June last year and the advice given was to ignore the, “fine”. However I can’t find the correspondence again and wondered if the advice was followed and how it turned out?     
    • just tell them the truth surely, it wasn't purposefully does and as you insurance company say, technically you were insured and so was the vehicle. it's not as if there was no insurance whatsoever and you were purposefully driving without ever taking out any.    
    • PCN Charge  - NTK received on 26th January for, “illegal” parking on the  Nicol Street Car Park for 11 minutes on 19th January, (having done so on the understanding that the car parks had been made free due to the COVID-19). I noticed a similar event and correspondence regarding the same car park in June last year and the advice given was to ignore the, “fine”. However I can’t find the correspondence again and wondered if the advice was followed and how it turned out?    Nicol Street Car Park Again - Private Land Parking Enforcement - Consumer Action Group
    • As per my old and new posts all correspondences have now ceased from all parties hence me raising issue again.   If defaulted in January 2018, surely I should have been notified?    
    • Hi   I received a NIP for traveling 39mph in a 30 zone (mobile speed camera) in December 2020. As it is my offence, the police sent a letter requesting to know who was driving with three possible outcomes: speed awareness course, 3 points of contest at court. I provided my details and sent the form off.    The police sent me a letter this week asking for confirmation of my insurance... I realised that in October 2020 I removed a private number plate off the vehicle and notified the DVLA and the V5 form but I didn't norify my insurers.    I called the insurance company today and updated my number plate and they said technically I was insured and the vehicle was insured and it depends on how linient the police will be.    I am just concerned as the recent letter states possible prosecution for driving with out insurance with a possible fine and 6 to 8 points.    If they add that to the original 3 I might be given that would be 11 for a first offence.    Has anyone got any experience on this or any advice as I am pretty worried!    Thanks 
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3677 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts


I have just received a NIP which says that either my wife or me had jumped a red light in our car

The letter was dated 16th December 2010 for an offense dated 13th December 2010.

As i was the driver my wife will be returning the form by record delivery on the 15th January [27 days after the nip was issued.

So far so good.

However we are about to go abroad for in my case until July 2011 [8 Months] and we intend to put a letter in the NIP telling them that

Given that they have to prosecute these things with 6 months of then being committed, by my warning them I am going away does that stop the clock? Or will the time expire because I am not in the UK

I have to write to let them know as there will be nobody here to receive any letters they send us.

So fa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re-arranging the facts slightly, in an effort to avoid doubt, I suspect the following is actually the case. I doubt that the NIP alleged that either you or your wife were driving but was simply addressed to the registered keeper of the vehicle - seemingly your wife. The s.172 requirement (which forms an integral part of the NIP) has obliged her to identify the driver at the time (you, the OP) within 28 days of the service of the requirement/NIP. Your wife will duly supply that info to reach the issuer on Day 27.


Subsequently, a further NIP will be issued to the OP for him to identify himself as the driver at the time and this information must be supplied within 28 days of the receipt of the s.172/NIP.


There are four basic scenarios into one of which matters will fall contingent upon the OP replying to his own s.172/NIP. Firstly, dependant upon which area the offence occurred a driver improvement/awareness course may be offered. A fee is payable to attend but there are no points attached to it and there are other conditions that must be satisfied in order to be eligible to take up such an offer (such as having not attended a similar course in the last 3 years).


Secondly, and probably the most likely, the OP will receive a Conditional Offer of Fixed Penalty (COFP). This entails paying £60 and the surrender of the OP's licence for the endorsement of 3 points. On receipt of such an offer the OP will have a further 28 days within which to respond.


Thirdly, a review of circumstances are deemed to be too serious and a summons is issued and the OP will be required to attend court. The same will apply if the DI/AC or COFP process stalls and is not complied with as might happen if this is occurs after the OP's departure abroad. His non-appearance will probably result in the case being heard in his absence and his licence may well then be suspended by DVLA until it is surrendered for endorsement. Such a process will almost certainly result in the imposition of a substantial fine as an assumption will be made as to income rather than relying on information concerning this from the OP himself which he will not be able to supply.


Lastly - and this applies ONLY if the alleged offence occurred in Scotland and NOT in England and Wales. This is known as "going unsigned". You wife replies as soon as possible and - assuming that you will be here to deal with your own s.172/NIP - that you complete it in every respect, identifying yourself as the driver but DO NOT sign the form. The practical application of the law in Scotland differs somewhat from that in E & W in that no one has yet been prosecuted for failure to furnish on the basis that they did not sign the form. However, what will then happen is that the police will call in person at your address and seek to make a verbal s.172 requirement which must be answered on the spot - no 28 days thinking time allowed. Such calls are far more likely to be persistent if you live in the same police area as the alleged offence took place in. However, assuming that you are going abroad imminently, then you will not be in to be required of but once the reply is in you are liable for a call at any time of the day or night.


Given that the OP intends to be absent for 8 months then this will effectively stall the process and no action will result as, in Scotland, matters must progress to pleading diet (plea and directions hearing at lower court) within 6 months not just to the laying of an information (applying for a summons) as in E & W. Without the signed form the authorities cannot proceed against the OP for the offence.


There is a small risk that they might proceed against him for failing to furnish but if they did it would be a first.


In essence, leaving all of this to fester by not attempting to deal with it at all is probably a bad idea.


If the Scottish route does not apply then might I suggest the following: That your wife replies as soon as possible (rather than pushing it to Day 27) and attaches to the response a letter explaining the situation (without giving a forwarding address abroad) and asking that they deal with the matter as expeditiously as possible. Ensure that besides completing the reply form that she writes across it "See Attached Letter". Keep copies of everything you have received and your reply and letter. The next step is very much dependant upon what her replies elicits and how long it takes. In some areas NIP's incorporate a COFP (such as Cumbria) and this would allow you to have the matter dealt with reasonably speedily. In others, however, you may need to arrange for someone to deal with your post and to be briefed on what to do at the next stage.


Overall, my suggestion is that you atempt to deal with the matter now rather than going abroad and having a far more complicated situation to deal with. In many respects I hope the offence is a Scottish one as your circumstances play straight into going unsigned.

Edited by Old Snowy
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...