Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Applied for and awarded by BY in Sept 2020 still not received it yet Comments appreciated
    • Hi Slick   I am not as experienced as you is there any thing in sar that i can identify. It does not state £2.5k debt in sar. It mentions new add ons.
    • So long story short.   I had a number of re-occurring loans with Unclebuck, I made a complaint in regards to my latest one back in 2019, got to an agreement to remove default markings and charges etc and just pay the principal. Didn't pay the outstanding amount due to personal reasons, being put on Furlough was one of them.   Saw that Unclebuck went into administration, made a redress application a couple of weeks ago, got awarded £807 for previous loans (not the latest one). So I contacted the administration to confirm they would pay the redress amount towards my outstanding balance, but they said they cannot do so?   How is that fair? I get they they can't pay me any cash, but surely they should be able to write off the current outstanding amount, it has to work both ways right? This was the latest response I got, so far no reply from their solicitor yet.   "Whilst I note your comments concerning your desire to set off Redress due in respect of unaffordable loans against your current loan that was not eligible for Redress, unfortunately the Administration precludes the position of set off until the Administrator makes a declaration under Rule 14.29 of the Insolvency Rules 2016. This declaration has not been made by the Administrators and will not be made as there is no distribution or intended dividend to be made to creditors in this particular Administration. Whilst I sympathise with your position, you will appreciate that the Administrators are governed by statute and cannot contract out of it.   I promise to speak to our solicitors to see if there is any room for manoeuvre on this matter and will come back to you afterwards, however I feel that it is unlikely. As you will appreciate making an exception for you may open the Administrators to claims from other customers in a similar position to yourself and indeed from other customers that do not have the benefit of another loan to set their Redress off against."   And to further add to it, I got an email today saying they transferred the loan to a collection field agency "Conexus Recovery and Field Services Ltd "  
    • Airline group IAG's call comes as it posts a huge annual loss after the pandemic grounded many flights. View the full article
    • Well as you're implying, UB, you're going to sign a better trade deal with a large economic bloc than with a small one, aren't you?   I don't think there's any chance of any deal based on a 'special relationship' while Biden's in the White House, but as I said I think Trump would have stitched us up in the end anyway.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

If I get sacked for gross misconduct can I claim JSA?


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3710 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I'm about to be sacked for gross misconduct, if I am can I claim JSA and HB (I rent)? Really worried about it as I have no one or no where to turn to for help and no savings. With the job market as it is it could easily be 6 months or a year before I get another job and without benifits i'll end up quite literally living on the streets.

 

This all happened on 24/12/10 and they called me in for the meeting today but I managed to pospone it as I said they have to give me reasonable time to seek advice. I've been to CAB and solicitors today but they are all shut until 4/1/11. If someone could tell me that I will at least get something from benefits to live on it would be a load off my mind. Thank you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

JSA can be sanctioned (payments of the benefit not made) where a person's employment has been terminated owing to misconduct. If sanctioned, it could be anything up to a maximum of 26 weeks. This is not from the date you left employment but from the date the JSA claim is made. A sanction is not definate as each case is dependent on the circumstances, but it is a possibility. In the case of a sanction, some people are successful in securing hardship payments (benefits at a reduced rate) - but again, this is subject to your circumstances. Using the guides below may provide more insight.

 

Sanctions

 

Hardship

 

You can still claim Housing Benefit and Council tax benefit whether your benefit is sanctioned or not, as housing benefit/council tax benefit is assessed on your income and capital, and does not concern itself with the reasons for unemployment.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ErikaPNP,

 

Thank you for your quick reply. I've had a look at the files you listed but to be honest it doesn't make much sense to me. I know it's very difficult to say without all the details facts but would I be right in saying that the most likely out come is that if I claim JSA it will be suspended for a time but as I have no savings or other income I should get a hardship payment? The fact that i'm claiming JSA even if it's suspended means that I can claim HB which I have done before and received and my circumstances haven't changed. If my JSA is reduced or suspended will I still get full HB?

 

As I said I know it's hard to say but i'm just looking for a rough idea. The thought of having no income of any sort especially with the current job market is very frightening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid I can't say. Without knowing the reasons behind a termination I can't even begin to speculate the liklihood of a sanction. There is no direct entitlement to a hardship payment in the event of a sanction. The DWP will consider your case and the circumstances around it but I can't second guess their decision.

 

If your JSA is suspended (and it won't be in the event of a sanction. Sanctions stop payment of the benefit, they don't suspend the benefit entitlement in itself) then HB/CTB can be affected if the claim is a linked claim (paid because you get income based JSA). In this case they are likely to suspend your payments until you make contact with them for a re-assessment based on income. If your JSA is sanctioned, your HB payments won't be any different to what they would normally be.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been accussed of being drunk at work which I wasn't. I was ill and sent home and the next thing I know when i've come into work i've been accussed of drinking at work and they had so called found a bottle of vodka half drunk. Two employees have made statements to say I was drunk and I have obviuosly made a statement saying I wasn't. I haven't had the disciplinary hearing as yet but i'm guessing that i'll get the sack. Too cut a long story short since I started the job i've been forced into doing things which are against the law and i'd had enough and started to refuse hence the false accustaions. It's a nightmare of a situation just what you wanted on christmas eve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the alcohol allegation, DWP will consider both you and your employers version of events. Your employer is unlikely to say anything other than the reason for dismissal. Some do go into more detail but most don't; and some won't say anything more than "misconduct". That part of it boils down to whose version of events they consider carries more weight. Regarding the things you have been asked to do. Again, if this is the reason given for your termination they would consider both versions but if you were being asked to do something unlawful and were terminated for refusing to follow such an instruction, DWP will not sanction JSA. Another thing that the DWP will take into account when deciding a sanction is whether you have appealed the decision of your employers (particularly on the grounds that you did not do what they have accused you of). Though this on its own will not make or break the decision, it is more favourable when a jobseeker has appealed his employers decision to terminate. A person who accepts a termination when they say they did not commit the "offence" the employer states they did, raises questions. On the other hand, a person who appeals against the termination on the grounds that he did not do what he was accused of, is more credible. (which I assume you would be doing)

 

You might want to consider posting on the employment forums for advise on how to put your case across to your employers at this disciplinary, and also for further advice on appealing - if it gets that far.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The problem you have got is that the JCP will have to weigh up the balance of probabilities, ie who do they beleave?

I would tell the JCP that the matter is going to an Employment Tribunal on grounds of unfair dismissal, also if you have somebody who can vouch that you were not drunk enclose a statement from them confirming this.

The DWP are swamped by new claminets, they are supposed to check all claiments for reasons why they are claiming. Chances are they wont in your case [but no guarentees], just putting doubt in their minds might tip the balance in your favour

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi

 

The problem you have got is that the JCP will have to weigh up the balance of probabilities, ie who do they beleave?

I would tell the JCP that the matter is going to an Employment Tribunal on grounds of unfair dismissal, also if you have somebody who can vouch that you were not drunk enclose a statement from them confirming this.

The DWP are swamped by new claminets, they are supposed to check all claiments for reasons why they are claiming. Chances are they wont in your case [but no guarentees], just putting doubt in their minds might tip the balance in your favour

 

Please please please refrain from encouraging people to break the law!!

 

From the OP's post on the Employment Forum (which you have responded to) it is clear that the OP has no chance with an ET as for starters he has insufficient length of service to claim Unfair Dismissal, and secondly, no ET is going to rule that the employer was wrong to dismiss even on the suggestion that the employee was driving after consuming Vodka.

 

To suggest that the OP now perjures himself because the JCP might not check the background of the claim is unbelievably bad advice. Please stick to what you KNOW rather than what you THINK. To do otherwise could not only lend false hope to those who need help, but it also devalues the reputation of the entire site.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

You can also cast a dispersion on the phrase 'there is doubt about your entitlement to the claim' which they will use in their letter when they tell you that you are being investigated [this is a standard letter and should not be read to mean that they are investigating anything]

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...