Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi   I received a NIP for traveling 39mph in a 30 zone (mobile speed camera) in December 2020. As it is my offence, the police sent a letter requesting to know who was driving with three possible outcomes: speed awareness course, 3 points of contest at court. I provided my details and sent the form off.    The police sent me a letter this week asking for confirmation of my insurance... I realised that in October 2020 I removed a private number plate off the vehicle and notified the DVLA and the V5 form but I didn't norify my insurers.    I called the insurance company today and updated my number plate and they said technically I was insured and the vehicle was insured and it depends on how linient the police will be.    I am just concerned as the recent letter states possible prosecution for driving with out insurance with a possible fine and 6 to 8 points.    If they add that to the original 3 I might be given that would be 11 for a first offence.    Has anyone got any experience on this or any advice as I am pretty worried!    Thanks 
    • Tend to agree Hammy, but I think if you have a number of DD's going through every month and the reference/descriptions does not clearly identify what it is for, then many people would not have queried it.   How many people still go through their Bank statements regularly to check every item. ?  I have mobile Banking now and keep an eye on the payments going through, but when I had printed statements sent, i only checked them every few months.   Normally for Insurance refunds in these situation, the Insurers should consider refunds of up to 6 years, if it can be evidenced that the Insurance was of no value.  e.g. the Insurance was for a specific risk which is no longer owned.   The DD was set up over the phone as a variable DD amount and the Insurers should have issued communications about increases to the email or postal address provided for this purpose.  When the DD was set up originally D&G would have had to send confirmation of the DD terms and rights of cancellation etc.  You can try to ask Natwest for a refund under DD scheme, but you may struggle with this.    Ask D&G to look at your refund request again as a complaint and advise that if not settled, you will ask the FOS to review.  D&G would be charged a fee by the FOS if you went that far, so they may try to offer you a refund amount, to avoid this.
    • The state-backed savings giant has been accused of abandoning older customers in its drive to axe prize warrants to save money and paper by only consulting customers with an email about the change. View the full article
    • Savers who put £10,000 in the average tax-free cash Isa ten years ago would now have £9,772, new research shows. This is because inflation has outstripped the interest earned on savings. View the full article
    • I did 3 times and havent received any terms and conditions, im just trying to back up my arguement should it get to court and they produce one, then I can tell well, they 1. Didnt manage to show 1 3 times I asked. 2. they cant even get their dates right on the paperwork so why should this be nay different to this paperwork.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Court Date for alledged speeding fine!

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3678 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi all,


Out of the blue I have recieved a court summons for an alledged speeding offence back in June, the paperwork was sent to my old address. The car itself I no longer own so naturally I did not have to inform DVLA of a new address.


Anyway. I have recieved 3 photos of the back end of my former car (no photo of the driver) and I have been given 3 options. Plead gulity by post, pleady guilty at court, or not guilty.


The court date is the 11th so dont have much time as I have only just recieved the letter. Both myself & my partner were insured on the car at the time so I do not honestly know who was driving it over six months ago!


Surely they have to prove who was the driver to convict someone? It seems they are taking the approach of its your car so unless you tell me different it is you we are going after.


The offense was for doing 35mph....


My license is completely clean so far.


I would appreciate any help someone can give me on how ro respond.



Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you notify the dvla of the change of registered keeper or sale of the vehicle at the time?


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did you notify the dvla of the change of registered keeper or sale of the vehicle at the time?


The car was repossessed early July and the DVLA were informed of the change of owner. I moved out roughly the same time and have not recieved anything before this. I cannot say nothing was sent, but I did not recieve it. Naturally I did not inform DVLA of a change of address as I do not own a car anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you sure that the summons is for the alleged speeding or is it in relation to having failed to furnish details of the driver at the time?


To me it reads as both. I have to tick whether I pleade gulity or not guilty to each offense. Not providing info ( did not recieve a letter so how can I?) and driving over the limit (might have been me, might have been my partner, we do not honestly know, it was six months ago and we always shared the driving)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its also an offense not to notify the DVLA of a chnage of address to your driving license


No it is not.


The address you provide to the DVLA only has to be an address at which you can be reached. This can be your parents address, a friend's, or even your pet hampster's (as long as the hampster knows how to let you know their is a letter there for you :) )

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...