Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA appeal and involvment of your Member of Parliament - Does it help?


stalin's dead
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4838 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if anyone, following a failed ESA medical, requested support from their MP? Did it have a positive effect and did it in anyway influence the DWP in anyway? Is it worth getting your MP involved to lobby the DWP on your behalf?

 

Just wondering if anyone has personal experience of this?

 

Kindest regards

 

SD

Link to post
Share on other sites

It can be worth it but it doesn't influence the decision, no as they have to make the decision in accordance with the legislation set. To be frank, most MP's know zip about benefits - and some don't bother to research it. I'll give you an example. I had a lady come to me because she had been refused for a Social Fund Maternity Grant on the grounds that she was not in receipt of a qualifying benefit. She received Incapacity Benefit and Disability Living Allowance. She got nothing else as her partner was a high earner and his salary was way above the threshold for any means tested benefits. She had already contacted her MP who was apparently "outraged" about this and was going to contact DWP and insist they pay her without further delay. I had to very gently explain to her the DWP's decision was correct and that her MP would not be sucessful in securing a payment. She was quite upset and not willing to accept this, even when I showed her the legislation that sets out what a "qualifying benefit" is and it doesn't include IB or DLA. All the MP had to do was get his staff to look into what a qualifying benefit was, but he didn't - he just went in there all guns blazing, giving false hope to this poor lady in the process. Needless to say she didn't get her grant. But if she had been getting something else which was a qualifying benefit and DWP hadn't considered that then the MP's involvement would have had a more positive outcome for her.

 

What they will do is send an outline of your communication to DWP, and this will result in them falling over themselves to look at your case and make sure they have done everything correctly. A response is then sent to your MP who will in turn respond to you. The most that will happen is you will get a result sooner and your case will be scrutinised within an inch of its life, to make sure they have done everything they are supposed to do. If they have done anything incorrectly then it's more likely to be addressed with MP's involvement. If they have made the right decision though in terms of applying the law to the facts then nothing will change because an MP cannot insist DWP ignore the law or the facts and cannot put pressure on the department to come to a specific outcome.

 

So in a nutshell: it is worth it if the decision is wrong and they won't budge. It's not worth it if the decision is correct. If you are not sure whether or not it is correct, it certainly can't do any harm. DWP move quickly when an MP is involved.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You too, my love.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then perhaps you need to remind him of that!

 

Always worth a try, and may even put you in touch with somebody better able to help...

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

No i recon that the DWP and the government have got it in for me anyway. I'm the guy whose FOI action caused the DWP millions to put right the cock up they made

Besides which as you might have guessed my MP is a tory. The Tory answer to the unemployed is Concentration Camps

But thanks anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fwiw it's worth, some people on the forum have involved their MP and had a good result. Often things start moving much faster. As sidewinder says, you might as well try, and it doesn't cost much at all. You can email an MP via the Houses of Parliament. I have a vague recollection of the title 'They work for you'.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote to my MP about Incapacity Benefit, Atos and ESA.

 

He wrote back, "Whilst there may be concerns about DLA I can assure you it will be fair..... etc etc"

 

He's a Tory so his reply was as expected.

 

They don't actually listen.

 

- dj

 

(Tories, I mean)

Benefits rules are complex, and although I do try to inform and support people, I may get it wrong because the rules apply to individual claimants and their particular circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just saw this - I got my (Tory) MP involved on the advice of the Stroke Association (I had a bleed on the brain last Feb). The outcome is I got an APOLOGY from Atos!! Yes I did. And they said they were sorry the medical had been carried out "wrong" and didn't take into account my cognitive and fatigue problems; and they would "offer further training" to the doctor who carried out the medical. And they apologised for the long wait I had, when the nurse who was supposed to carry it out realised I should be seen by a (more qualifed??!) doctor.

 

That was end of last year. I have just this week had the decision revised in my favour and been paid back pay. In my case, they have agreed that I have "limited capability for work" and as such I'm entitled to ESA.

 

Very stressful but a good outcome. Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...