Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is response to CPR rules you sent me - my observations are   1)they havent stated under what law/legislation they make a claim, they have mentioned document they rely on but didnt serve it with application as above   2)they didnt serve application or evidence on me ever! court knows this    3)this is a telephone hearing where no oral evidence is to be given , do we do skeleton arguments or court bundle , when do we give to court - order is to only submit evidence in response 7 days before hearing   4) there are /is a document which gives complete defence to the claim, disclosable at trial , so they shouldnt have sought summary judgement a)i have an email from them ,  a deed of guarantee and indemnity (DOGI) was required for guarantee, pre condition to lending b)i have a docusign email sending request to sign this  DOGI document (not attached it was a docusign login) , c)they dont have a copy of it and havent provided under SAR or specific request.  d) anyone who does a DOGI, is not defined as a 'Guarantor' in the agreement, which is not signed in a personal capacity anyway, e)so in the application they rely on loan agreement having a self contained gurantor section, and the fact my name is next to word guarantor (but not signed personally, no statute of frauds anyways)   their definition of a guarantor-"person named in offer letter who enters into this loan agreement to provide a personal guarantee and indemnity. this definition excludes any third party guarantor who enters into a seperate DOGI"
    • Hi Anney.   Let's give this a bit longer. With the best will in the world, altosbestos hasn't been here very long and we don't know much about them. It would be good to know what forum regulars think about what altos is advising.   HB  
    • thanks for that very helpful, ill make some points on it in a minute just wanted to say they never served me application against CPR, i had to obtain off court a copy. They refer in wtiness st - marked as what they rely to support application a paginated bundle PR1 which apparently accompanies the statement, i can see from the references and amount of pages it should be the loan offer and loan agreement, as you would expect.   so i asked court can i have copy of PR1 so i can check, they just got back and said  claimant has never either in electronic database or in paper, served a bundle PR1 with the application,    there said it was claimants job to serve everyone and me- so ask them      i was about to and i had a thought, they havent submitted any evidence in support of their application why remind them !   in theory judge will get to hearing and go where is your evidence of this agreement?   and for the record they are very sloppy and do make major mistakes in their paperwork, so this isnt unusual
    • You can draft the letter before action yourself and send it against the individual that's not giving you clear responses. No need to involve solicitors at this stage.   I would recommend you do it today, start maintaining a paper trail. 
    • Obviously the real proof will come when the contract is revealed.   In the meantime you could write to the DVLA asking who applied for your data back in 2017. And show them the signage where both companies are listed and ask in view of who asked for your details, did the right one apply and what is their view on both companies showing on the sign.   Is this legal and explain that you are in the middle of a Court case and they may be called.
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies

Great Universal Charging Goods Extended Terms Instead Of BNPL


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3427 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I purchased a load of goods for my kitchen November 2009 from the catalogue on buy now pay later paid them off but noticed the cooker and freezer were not showing queried this eventually when they could make head or tale of it they said they had been put on extended terms and that they had already been charging me for them, I argued that I had asked for all goods to be on buy now pay later why would I choose not to place 2 of the items on this.

 

I signed no credit agreement but they are insistent that this stands they have sent me a statement and terms of these 2 items as required by law yet they sent them only when I queried everything by law it said i should have got the details every 12 months got them 14 months after

 

I have requested a copy of the signed credit agreement what will they do now as I never signed one as didn`t want terms wanted to pay them off when the buy now pay later date was due

 

Where do I stand as they have added no end of interestlink3.gif at 29.9% cooker was £959 cash added £439.04 and freezer was £223.50 interest added is £66.45 started paying these on 21st November 2010

 

Any advice appreciated as I`m so annoyed wanted to pay the cash prices along with all the other items they put my fridge on the buy now pay later but not the freezer!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did you place the order? If you have written confirmation of it that the BNPL applied to all items then you've got them by the short and danglies, although from my own recollection I think they force you to call if buying BNPL (how convenient for them eh?).

 

As for a CCA I believe that after a certain point in I think 2007 that ticking the box to say you agree to the T&C's online can stand as a valid CCA with a catalogue company.

 

Sorry I can't help much further but I hope you get some answers.

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

re cca - 31/12/2004 for online agreements

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ordered over phone statements have become complicated to be fair even the staff can`t explain things too well over the phone. I recall getting a cca to sign but never signed or sent it back as I didn`t intend to accept the 29% interest I always put money aside for the end of bnpl and pay it off

 

I have nothing in writing showing the 2 items were not on added with rest of items as what they do is they just list your order as a bulk order in value terms you have no idea what is what till nearer the end of bnpl when I rang up about the 2 items not showing on the list to pay goods off I were told they were placed on extended terms instead of bnpl I ordered them all together so cannot make head or tale why 2 items escaped the bnpl my fridge got put on bnpl but my freezer as been put on extended terms

 

I have requested a signed credit agreement for the extended term goods but no idea how I go about this as I know I have not signed for credit

Link to post
Share on other sites
re cca - 31/12/2004 for online agreements

 

Hi can I do anything about the interest being added to these 2 items without my knowledge? they won`t be able to show me any agreement signed as I have not signed for extended terms they had no rights to place these items on extended terms I never requested they did I wanted all items on bnpl so how thse 2 items were allocated different to rest of appliances I ordered as annoyed me

Link to post
Share on other sites
I have requested a signed credit agreement for the extended term goods but no idea how I go about this as I know I have not signed for credit

 

As far as I know simply opening an account with these types of companies means that you have been given some form of credit, if you decide to use it or not. they have obviously been underhand if as you say they have decided to put items on credit terms rather then BNPL, possibly an error by the operator or maybe a way for them to make some commission I have no idea. Sorry I can't be of any more help, it seems they are a law unto themselves.

Ex CAG helper ^_^

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going to ring trading standards ask their advice no idea if Great Universal are obliged to send me a copy of signed crdit agreement as I have requested one but I know for sure they will be unable to do this as I never signed one yes it doesn`t seem right that they can place 2 of the appliances on extended credit terms when I didn`t want to pay interest and have paid the other items off

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trading Standards put me onto Consumer Direct they said Great Universal is in breach of contract placing a couple of the goods ordered in a bulk order with interest added to them of which I did not agree to or sign a credit agreement for they said I should resend copies of letter sent requesting copy of the credit agreement I signed and state they have 14 days to do so they won`t be able to send it as never signed or agreed to interest being added be interesting to see what if anything happens as my last letter was nearly a month ago and of course I have had no response to it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand no signature is required. You were sent the form, received the goods and then starter to make repayments. They will rake this as an acceptance if the terms as you neither returned the form saying you rejected those terms, nor queried this until long after the goods were in use.

 

Now I agree this sucks, but the court will only look at the transaction as a whole, and your lack of rejection. Since you knew their APR, why did you not challenge or reject it? It is this you will fight hard to justify.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never knew that the 2 items out the bulk order had escaped the BNPL till it came to pay them off the total they gave was wrong not one of the Indian callers who dealt with me could offer an explanation to this I`d had not received any credit agreement to reject?

 

I kept ringing back till eventually some one was able to tell me 2 of the items had been placed on extended terms

 

I have never had goods on interest added I put them on calendar when they due to be paid off and I pay them off with money set aside

 

Strange that you don`t have to be sent a credit agreement if your agreeing to credit

Link to post
Share on other sites

Historically (and I'm happy to be corrected) these 'catalogue clubs' were an exception and it has to be said, they were also the starting point for the main CRAs because they retained the payment status of their 'agents' to ensure they only used those who had an established track record.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to go on what people tell me as I don`t know any different but consumer direct said they have to send you a credit agreement which you sign and agree to which I haven`t so they say they are in breach of contract? I will wait and see what they do after I have given them 14 days to respond

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately CD often get it wrong more often than they get it right (from what we see on here). Nothing is black and White. You should have pushed for some additional answers, like - since they have no contract, can I stop paying? Will they be able to default me on my credit report? Will you assist me should they take me to court?

 

The answer to the last one will be "No".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that strangeley enough CD suggested inmy last line of communication to GU that I say failure to respond within 14 days will result in legal action being taken I always find that CAB not much use so now I learn CD about the same I get more help and accurate advice on CAG that`s why I come on here thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

They mean well, but CAG is better for real-world outcomes than theory. The requirement to respond in 14 days is unreasonable, and just what will the 'legal action' be, and whose paying for it? There is little point hurtling to the courts if you cannot afford to and and unsure of the risk of doing so!

 

Let them take 45 days to respond, it makes their treatment of your complaint look reprehensible, and without threats they might even agree to a suitable compromise without too much trouble. Take things easy, don't get riled or painted into a corner, but make them do all the running - that way, you're the one in control and never make false threats. Imply that you might take 'further action' no need to specify what that might be. If you decide the time is ripe to teach them a lesson, send an LBA stating your grievance, what you want done, and a timeframe to do it in (28 days is reasonable). If they don't, lodge the papers. Never threaten if you don't plan to follow it through!

Link to post
Share on other sites

All took on board however I never make a threat I`m not willing to carry out took a case on against HMRC for a relative it was a complex case help and advice was given on here was awarded compensation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would a Subject Access Request to GU, unearth any information regarding this ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Trading Standards threatning action against Great Universal they supplied a credit card agreement eventually which does not have my account number on, date, address etc Great Universal state they should be allowed to charge me interest on goods despite me stating that I never ordered goods on extended terms nor signed a credit agreement, it was a bulk order 2 of the items they singled out and added interest I have been complaining about this for over a year.

 

I have gone to make an order this evening and it says my order as been declined I have a large available credit and have always paid the bill on time so looks like they declined me because I took them to the Trading Standards can they do this to me, I was within my rights to ask them to remove this interest they added to my goods why now decline me as a customer

Edited by Laura Cooke
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rang the catalogue today said all future orders are to be rejected off me for bringing an "Outside body in" to dispute my credit agreement she said I am regarded as I`m not paying for goods even though I have always paid on time have lots of credit left, only thing I`m disputing is having interest added to 2 items that were part of a bulk order. Woman on phone snotty and said interest would have only been added because I didn`t pay for goods at end of the buy now pay later told her I always pay goods off it`s just that 2 of the items were eliminated off the buy now and put on extended terms and I have said if I asked for this to happen where is the credit agreement that I signed agreeing to this. Of course they have been unable to produce my credit agreement as I never signed for goods on extended terms. They now choose to treat me as someone who intends not to pay for goods I have already had which is nonsense

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

I am still paying for them they put them on weekly from the day they arrived not known to me as the statements are not transparent rest of the order I paid for it when the buy now pay later ran out in October 2010 crazy as the fridge went through on the buy now but the freezer didn`t it was a bulk order of electrical appliances for the kitchen they probably think I am not going to finish paying for my goods now they have not been able to produce a credit agreement but nothing could be further from the truth I wouldn`t risk a very good credit record

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...