Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In August 2018, I took out a 2 year contract with Virgin-pay monthly with handset included and payment by DD.   Everything went fine until February 2020 when a new second DD appeared for £6 with a number that I did not recognize-as it was clearly a mistake, Virgin refunded the £6, I cancelled the DD.   In March 2020 the DD amount had been added onto my main account as a second line with handset. There were now also details of a loan in the amount of £204 for purchase of the handset. I asked for details of this handset-what type it was, where it had been sold, any evidence that I had purchased it, any documents with my signature on. Virgin's reply was that 'I had bought it at my local store'(they couldn't specify which one) and that the fact I had a handset(I have not received anything) was proof that I had signed to this.   In April I put in a SAR request for any documents showing that I was responsible for this. It took until June for a reply(I was generous with them because of the coronavirus) when files were sent, but there was no password included to actually access the files.  Repeated requests for it got nowhere and in August the contract terminated and I moved to 3. However, Virgin still had me registered as a customer on a second line and are attempting to take money out via DD which is now showing as a failed payment. They also have a default on my credit report for the £204.   I repeatedly requested the password but this was not supplied, Virgin stating that they had fulfilled the SAR by sending the files, whether or not they could actually be accessed.    Finally on 29/9 I was promised the password would be sent to me by text message within 3-5 working days. When that didn't arrive, I was told once again that they had fulfilled the SAR and that if I kept asking for the password, the SAR would be rejected as 'repetitive demands'. Then I was told they would supply the password, but it would take up to 30 days.    Today I have been told that my SAR has been rejected(no reason given) and that they only have to supply data from the last 3 months.    I am desperate to get this removed from my credit file, Virgin have provided no evidence, refusing SAR requests(sent by email and mail) and are now in breach of GDPR for failing to provide the data in a timely manner.   Any help on what my next step is to proceed will  be muchly appreciated!     
    • Even Bernard Jenkin of all people is saying that Dido should go, that was quite a surprise this morning in the Guardian.
    • Over 832k signatures on End child food poverty - no child should be going hungry Gov petition   https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/554276
    • Send the SAR again registered post they have to reply. If they don't a Solicitor's letter will be the quickest way to remedy that. Glad you got the apology letter, keep safe with your Swift paperwork. A Solicitor will be able to point you in the right direction during this process of how best you can tackle Swift. Please come back to update.
    • hi.  i think they will be able to say manifest error that the markets stipulated some interest payment.  but the amount depends on central banks / libor rate ect and the amount of currency held and the length of time held. but they have deducted far too much so i am just wandering what sort of breaches i could write in the poc   thank you
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

In reply to my CCA request HSBC quoting Carey v HSBC 2009 what now?


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 3421 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

We have got in to difficulty repaying my wife's credit card after I had a back operation and then had a heart attact . We are now surving on disabilty benefits.

 

We have been making token payments regularly. HSBC had agreed to these payments albeit saying that normal collections procedures will continue. This was after I had wrote asking for the debt to be written off and following that suppied them with a budget statement

 

She was then issued with a default notice, I took advice from the forum and asked for the original credit card agreement

 

HSBC replied that they did not have original but sent reconstituted copy, T&Cs, variation and statement of account . I then sent another letter asking them to confirm that they did not have the original signed agreement

 

They sent me back a letter saying they had complied with Section 78 by supplying copies and in light of the recent High Court decision in Carey v HSBC 2009 they had satified my request and they see no merit in my continued insistence that the documents supplied are in breach of the CCA

 

They have now passed my wifes case to Metropolitan and she has recieved their standard recovery letter and the 1st phone call

 

How does she stand at the moment in the light of the Carey v HSBC letter and what is her (our) next step

 

We understand that we owe this money and have always in the last 25 years paid the amount due on the card, but with me now out of work and my wife caring for me we cannot afford their payments

 

Any advice would be gratefully received

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can do this to satisfy a s.78 request but they still need the original at court, Also you could put them to strict proof that these are the correct terms and conditions that would have been in place at that time.....

 

I would like to know how they would do that.

 

If they have stated that they may take you to court - you can then send a CPR 31.16 letter asking for all info on which they intend to rely upon - you cant send these willy nilly so wait for the threat....

 

 

Civil Procedure Rules (31.16)

 

(1)This rule applies where an application is made to the court under any Act for disclosure before proceedings have started1.

 

(2)The application must be supported by evidence. (Hence - wait for the threat)

 

(3)The court may make an order under this rule only where –

 

(a)the respondent is likely to be a party to subsequent proceedings;

 

(b)the applicant is also likely to be a party to those proceedings;

 

©if proceedings had started, the respondent’s duty by way of standard disclosure, set out in rule 31.6, would extend to the documents or classes of documents of which the applicant seeks disclosure; and

 

(d)disclosure before proceedings have started is desirable in order to –

 

(i)dispose fairly of the anticipated proceedings;

 

(ii)assist the dispute to be resolved without proceedings; or

 

(iii)save costs.

 

(4)An order under this rule must –

 

(a)specify the documents or the classes of documents which the respondent must disclose; and

 

(b)require him, when making disclosure, to specify any of those documents –

 

(i)which are no longer in his control; or

 

(ii)in respect of which he claims a right or duty to withhold inspection.

 

(5)Such an order may –

 

(a)require the respondent to indicate what has happened to any documents which are no longer in his control; and

 

(b)specify the time and place for disclosure and inspection.

Edited by rdm2006

HTH (Hope This Helps) RDM2006

 

THE FORCE (OF CAG) IS WITH YOU

;)

 

We've Helped You To Claim - Now Help Us Remain

A live Site - Make a Donation

 

All advice and opinions given by people on this site are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, please seek qualified professional legal Help.

 

However, if you have found any advice you have been given helpful.

Why not show your gratitude And

Click the * on the post you found helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mick

 

What they didn't tell you, was that it also stated in Carey v HSBC (2009) that if the agreement has been 'Varied' i.e. the interest rate has been increased by the creditor, then the creditor has to provide a Copy of the Original Agreement as well as T&C at the time of request.

 

http://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/markup.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2009/3417.html

 

Theres a summary at the bottom, but it might be an idea to go through the lot. 234 (4).

 

HSBC like to 'Cherry Pick'.

 

No doubt the interest rate has been 'Varied' many times.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rdm2006 and rebel11

 

Thank you both for your reply's.

 

rdm2006, so if they need the original for a court appearance and do not seem to have it, I presume they are playing games and trying to put pressure on?

 

rebel11, I started to read through the whole of the case but got bogged and lost the thread of it, but read and understood 234 (4)

 

What do you suggest that I do now? Would it be wise to reply to HSBC quoting 234 (4) and asking for the original CCA to be sent?

 

Also, is my case "in dispute"? If so can I reply to Metropolitan requesting them to cease contact as it is in dispute and HSBC cannot pass the case on to DCA

 

I would like to get to the stage where a firm offer of repayments or a full and final amount is reached. We have been paying a nominal sum each month (this is all we can afford) which HSBC are now rejecting by passing it over to Metropolitan

 

Look forward to your reply

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi rebel1

 

Received a reply from HSBC as per scan below, nothing yet from Metro. I do think there is any need for a reply to this, do you agree?

 

Regards

 

Mike

 

HSBC rely to letter 30th dec.jpg

 

Hope you can see this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rebel11

 

Any thoughts on post No 10? It is a reply from HSBC after sending the letter you suggested in the following post

 

Thanks, Mike

 

 

 

Hi Mick

 

I'm inclined to send HSBC, the following letter :- http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?436-Failure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale.

 

I'm inclined to send Met, the following letter :- http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?426-A-letter-when-the-account-has-been-passed-to-another-debt-collection-agency

 

Try not to get into paper tennis with these companies.

Send the letters Recorded.

Link to post
Share on other sites

File it, wait to see if you get something different from the room along the corridor (metro).

 

The ball is in there court at present, you have shown youre not to be hoodwinked by their use of their test case Carey vs HSBC :-)

 

S.

Are You as Anonymous on CAG as You Think You Are? *Link*

 

The CAG is a free help site,should you be offered help that requires payment,please report it to site team.

 

Deal with your debts:

STEP ONE - Dont Panic! | STEP TWO - Priority & Non Priority Debts | STEP THREE - Personal Budget Sheet | STEP FOUR - A SAFE bank Account | STEP FIVE - Dealing with Priority Debts | STEP SIX - Non-priority Debts | STEP SEVEN - Non-Priority Debt-Repayment Opt1 | STEP EIGHT - Non-Priority Debt-Repayment Opt2 | STEP NINE - Perils of Consolidation | STEP TEN - RE-Evaluate Frequently

 

***** SERIOUSLY IN DEBT, DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO, TRY NationalDebtLine's MoneySteps *****

 

 

IMPORTANT: Please take my advice in the spirit it is given and on the basis that I am expressing my opinion, These opinions are not endorsed by CAG in anyway and are offered informally without prejudice or warranty of any kind. These opinions are solely based upon the knowledge I've gained from this fantastic site and life in general. I have NO legal training.

Link to post
Share on other sites
File it, wait to see if you get something different from the room along the corridor (metro).

 

The ball is in there court at present, you have shown youre not to be hoodwinked by their use of their test case Carey vs HSBC :-)

 

S.

Hi Shadow

Thanks for the reply will wait around to see what happens

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Shadow

 

Sent off the 2 letters one to Metro and one to HSBC as you suggested and have received from Metro the following letters:- http://i936.photobucket.com/albums/ad204/mcork/Metroscans12.jpg and http://i936.photobucket.com/albums/ad204/mcork/Metroscans.jpg

 

Can I CCA Metro to either get them off my back or to push them further or just ignore?

 

My wife is still paying a token payment each month.She would like to continue this to show she is not running away from her debts, but is just not in a position to pay the minimum payment, is this ok to continue?

 

Look forward to your reply

 

Mike

Edited by mickthespur
Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Shadow

 

Sent off the 2 letters one to Metro and one to HSBC as you suggested and have received from Metro the following letters:- http://i936.photobucket.com/albums/ad204/mcork/Metroscans12.jpg and http://i936.photobucket.com/albums/ad204/mcork/Metroscans.jpg

 

Can I CCA Metro to either get them off my back or to push them further or just ignore?

 

My wife is still paying a token payment each month.She would like to continue this to show she is not running away from her debts, but is just not in a position to pay the minimum payment, is this ok to continue?

 

Look forward to your reply

 

Mike

 

Personally i think its at a standstill, they have "noted" your arguments but wont counter them :-D so they think they can continue to carry on regardless. as to token payments...I've had same letter from metro and ignored it and carried on paying token amounts and still am.

 

S.

Are You as Anonymous on CAG as You Think You Are? *Link*

 

The CAG is a free help site,should you be offered help that requires payment,please report it to site team.

 

Deal with your debts:

STEP ONE - Dont Panic! | STEP TWO - Priority & Non Priority Debts | STEP THREE - Personal Budget Sheet | STEP FOUR - A SAFE bank Account | STEP FIVE - Dealing with Priority Debts | STEP SIX - Non-priority Debts | STEP SEVEN - Non-Priority Debt-Repayment Opt1 | STEP EIGHT - Non-Priority Debt-Repayment Opt2 | STEP NINE - Perils of Consolidation | STEP TEN - RE-Evaluate Frequently

 

***** SERIOUSLY IN DEBT, DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO, TRY NationalDebtLine's MoneySteps *****

 

 

IMPORTANT: Please take my advice in the spirit it is given and on the basis that I am expressing my opinion, These opinions are not endorsed by CAG in anyway and are offered informally without prejudice or warranty of any kind. These opinions are solely based upon the knowledge I've gained from this fantastic site and life in general. I have NO legal training.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shadow

 

Thank you for the very quick reply. Will carry on with the token payments and wait for the next stage, I imagine will be DG, will let you know as and when things develop, once again thanks

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Shadow

 

Thank you for the very quick reply. Will carry on with the token payments and wait for the next stage, I imagine will be DG, will let you know as and when things develop, once again thanks

 

Mike

 

Yep had a letter from them too... just sent them the same offer as I'm paying and carried on paying... 3 months down the line now :-D

 

S.

Are You as Anonymous on CAG as You Think You Are? *Link*

 

The CAG is a free help site,should you be offered help that requires payment,please report it to site team.

 

Deal with your debts:

STEP ONE - Dont Panic! | STEP TWO - Priority & Non Priority Debts | STEP THREE - Personal Budget Sheet | STEP FOUR - A SAFE bank Account | STEP FIVE - Dealing with Priority Debts | STEP SIX - Non-priority Debts | STEP SEVEN - Non-Priority Debt-Repayment Opt1 | STEP EIGHT - Non-Priority Debt-Repayment Opt2 | STEP NINE - Perils of Consolidation | STEP TEN - RE-Evaluate Frequently

 

***** SERIOUSLY IN DEBT, DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO, TRY NationalDebtLine's MoneySteps *****

 

 

IMPORTANT: Please take my advice in the spirit it is given and on the basis that I am expressing my opinion, These opinions are not endorsed by CAG in anyway and are offered informally without prejudice or warranty of any kind. These opinions are solely based upon the knowledge I've gained from this fantastic site and life in general. I have NO legal training.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Just a follow up for those interested 3 months or so on now and my wife is still paying token payments. She had one letter from Metro asking her to set up a agreement with them to pay token payment each month by a certain date etc.

 

This we ignored and have carried on with token payments, no more so far has been heard.

 

Would really like them to respond with an offer to clear the debt, but will not hold our breath

 

Thanks to Shadow and others for their advice will update if any thing else arises

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Yes obviously because you are acknowledging the debt each time you pay however you will clear the debt and it will be done with.. if you look at the results from court reports recently not having the agreement is not always a bar to getting a judgement and its certainly no bar on someone taking you to court. I'd rather settle outside of court and possible costs if it was me.

 

S.

Are You as Anonymous on CAG as You Think You Are? *Link*

 

The CAG is a free help site,should you be offered help that requires payment,please report it to site team.

 

Deal with your debts:

STEP ONE - Dont Panic! | STEP TWO - Priority & Non Priority Debts | STEP THREE - Personal Budget Sheet | STEP FOUR - A SAFE bank Account | STEP FIVE - Dealing with Priority Debts | STEP SIX - Non-priority Debts | STEP SEVEN - Non-Priority Debt-Repayment Opt1 | STEP EIGHT - Non-Priority Debt-Repayment Opt2 | STEP NINE - Perils of Consolidation | STEP TEN - RE-Evaluate Frequently

 

***** SERIOUSLY IN DEBT, DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO, TRY NationalDebtLine's MoneySteps *****

 

 

IMPORTANT: Please take my advice in the spirit it is given and on the basis that I am expressing my opinion, These opinions are not endorsed by CAG in anyway and are offered informally without prejudice or warranty of any kind. These opinions are solely based upon the knowledge I've gained from this fantastic site and life in general. I have NO legal training.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...