Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • MANUKI12742
      Advise on debt I currently hold

      By MANUKI12742 · Posted

      okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • Alfy
      Ovo Energy Bill is way too high - faulty smart meter

      By Alfy · Posted

      I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • Badtimes123
      LC Asset/Link/Kearns Claim Form #2 - MBNA CC

      By Badtimes123 · Posted

      To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • Lorenz
      MCOL help not being paid for job

      By Lorenz · Posted

      No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Badtimes123
      LC Asset/Link/Kearns Claim Form #1 - Halifax CC

      By Badtimes123 · Posted

      Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

PCN Time Limits Advice **CANCELLED**

taylorit
 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4784 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

taylorit

taylorit

Posted
Posted

Hi

 

I need some advice I received a PCN on 86 on 14 August 2010,

Made an Informal challenge on 20 August 2010 which was rejected,

Notice to Owner Received on 21 October 2010

Formal Challenge made on 02 November 2010

Charge Notice Received on 21 November 2010

Formal Challenge Rejected on 16 December 2010

 

Can you tell me if the council is in the wrong and where I can go with this? I was parked in an area not operated by the council car park which is attached, but parked outside my partners flat.

 

I have requested from the council to supply me with a detailed map showing the location for which the Parking Place Order relates and they have ignored but did supply me with a copy with the PPO which does not specify the boundaries of the car park which is adjoined by private land on which I was parked, belongs to Sainsbury and the residents of the flats.

 

Also if the PCN number has the CEO badge number incorrect does this render the PCN invalid? ie Badge Number is AB0012 but shown on PCN as AB012 missing a leading 0.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jamberson

Jamberson

Posted
Posted

Charge Notice Received on 21 November 2010

Formal Challenge Rejected on 16 December 2010

 

This is incorrect. The Council has fouled up. You could try applying for a tribunal hearing with PATAS alleging impropriety. They may resign the case rather than contest it at a hearing. Alternatively, you could write to the council and point out their mistake and ask them to cancel now - there's a chance they will. (Incidentally, the "Charge Notice" is in fact a Charge Certificate, right?)

 

I have requested from the council to supply me with a detailed map showing the location for which the Parking Place Order relates and they have ignored but did supply me with a copy with the PPO which does not specify the boundaries of the car park which is adjoined by private land on which I was parked, belongs to Sainsbury and the residents of the flats.

 

Also if the PCN number has the CEO badge number incorrect does this render the PCN invalid? ie Badge Number is AB0012 but shown on PCN as AB012 missing a leading 0.

 

No it does not, and to be honest, asking for documents in an appeal is pretty pointless. If you want them, ask for them in a seperate letter - it won't help your appeal to include a request there. If you have reasonable doubts about the car park boundary, this might be worth pursuing anyway, with a view to going to a tribunal with that as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
taylorit

taylorit

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Documents uploaded to http://www.mattuk.net/pcn/gc2

 

PCN, NOR, NTO, Charge Certificate x 2, Informal Rejection Response.

 

Have just realised that the Charge Certifice has been issued TWICE ones dated thee 18th November the other 19th November and Notice of Rejection arrived today dated 15th December.

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites
f.in.debt

f.in.debt

Posted
Posted

The next step for the council will be northhampton county court, And you will be able to make you representation there, if your right you will win!

 

I have been through this, not the same - the council would not acknoledge my appeals, so at court won by default. But good look

"Don't give in to astonishment", which is exactly what you want to do. You want to go nuts with how crazy this is! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
f.in.debt

f.in.debt

Posted
Posted

Just to add

 

If the coucil did not follow procedure, you will win.

 

ie not there zone, not the right picture, they lost the cat

"Don't give in to astonishment", which is exactly what you want to do. You want to go nuts with how crazy this is! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jamberson

Jamberson

Posted
Posted

For clarification, with reference to the above two posts:

 

The next step would normally be for the Council to register the debt with Northampton County Court, but as the Council has just issued you with a Notice of Rejection, you can take the case to adjudication instead. That's your call. It will stop the case progressing if you do. (You can't make representations via Northampton County Court, and nor do you need to.)

 

If the council did not follow procedure, you will not necessarily win, but it will be a line of argument you can pursue. It depends how the adjudicator sees it, whether it is deemed relevant to the case.

 

If the picture is not right (I guess that means if the CEO photographs do not prove the case), then this is largely immaterial.

Link to post
Share on other sites
green_and_mean

green_and_mean

Posted
Posted
The next step for the council will be northhampton county court, And you will be able to make you representation there, if your right you will win!

 

I have been through this, not the same - the council would not acknoledge my appeals, so at court won by default. But good look

 

 

You CANNOT appeal a PCN at County Court, you cannot win by default, stop giving stupid advice!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
f.in.debt

f.in.debt

Posted
Posted

So you either wait for the council to apply to the court, in my case they did write to me and ask for my side! then after you can go to the TPT

 

Or you go to the TPT, would proberly not give an increase in penalty if you are not sucessful, but may be the last chance, but not sure on this! As mine was canceled here.

 

Or take GnM advise and send the money in a chritmas card.

"Don't give in to astonishment", which is exactly what you want to do. You want to go nuts with how crazy this is! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Jamberson

Jamberson

Posted
Posted
So you either wait for the council to apply to the court, in my case they did write to me and ask for my side! then after you can go to the TPT

 

Or you go to the TPT, would proberly not give an increase in penalty if you are not sucessful, but may be the last chance, but not sure on this! As mine was canceled here.

 

Or take GnM advise and send the money in a chritmas card.

 

Look, you don't know how the system works, G&M does. You came here for advice because you don't understand how to deal with your own PCNs. Stop giving bogus advice out.

Link to post
Share on other sites
honeybee13

honeybee13

Posted
Posted

Taylorit, obviously it's up to you whose advice you take. I won't insult you by telling you how to check someone's history on CAG [but post again if you don't happen to know], but having hung around the forum learning for a little while, I'd rather take the advice of someone who's consistently advised on parking than a cagger who's been on the forum for 10 minutes with their own [as yet unresolved] query.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
green_and_mean

green_and_mean

Posted
Posted

You should ring the Council and request the current staus of the case it should be on hold awaiting reps to the notice of rejection to TPT, if its at charge certificate stage ask why as you have only just had the NOR. Conplete the TPT forms and state 'no contravention took place' as you were not in the car park and include evidence to this fact. In addition state 'impropriety' as you got the CC whilst awaiting a NOR.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...