Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court papers Safeloan UK


donnahaywood
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4877 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took out a payday loan with Safeloans Ltd, which I defaulted on.

I owe them £248.23.

 

At the end of October I received court papers from NorthHampton court.

 

I was unable to pay the full amount so I filled in the form and gave my budget, as instructed, and stated that I would be able to pay £5 a month.

 

10 days later I received a letter from Safeloans accepting my offer and setting up a standing order.

 

I paid the £5 in Novemebr, as agreed, but today I have received new court papers stating that I "have not replied to the claim form" and that I must pay £268.23 within the next month. I'm very confused and worried.

 

Any advice would be great!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is why! Sneaky trick on their behalf. There are a couple of options open to you.

 

1 - you could apply for Set Aside in which case if you succeed the case goes back to the stage where the Claim was started. Downside to this is that sometimes the Court is looking for payment to made available or a good proportion paid off. If you were able to pay off what you owe then the CCJ would be wiped.

 

2 - possible the best route if you cannot afford to pay it all is to apply for a Variation Order - you will be able to pay as you have suggested but you will stay with the CCJ for the next 6 years.

 

In both above there is a Fee to pay for the application but if on certain Benefits or a low wage you may be able to apply for Fee Remission. Whatever you do make your decision quickly.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent the forms back to Safeloans.....court froms said not to send the papers to the court but to the claimanant's address.

 

I'm particularly concerned by this statement.

 

"court froms said not to send the papers to the court but to the claimanant's address"

 

Do you have a copy of this form telling you to return the defence to the claimant by any chance?

As of 03/03/12 please do not under any circumstances wait for my further input or guidance on any current thread or defence of a court claim I might have been involved in on or through Cag.

Jasper1965

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent the forms back to Safeloans.....court froms said not to send the papers to the court but to the claimanant's address.

 

I'm particularly concerned by this statement.

 

"court froms said not to send the papers to the court but to the claimanant's address"

 

Do you have a copy of this form telling you to return the defence to the claimant by any chance?

 

And is it stamped by the court?

Edited by Jasper1965

As of 03/03/12 please do not under any circumstances wait for my further input or guidance on any current thread or defence of a court claim I might have been involved in on or through Cag.

Jasper1965

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you'll find the confusion is on the N1 where it first says "Claimant" underneath this the next box states "address for sending Documents and Payments" if different.....

 

Unfortunately Donna you've probably misread the form, a genuine mistake, but in saying that admitting the debt having offered Safeloans £5 per month and making the payment in November a judgement would have been awarded against you regardless.

 

You've done nothing wrong, although Safeloan if they were being honest should have returned the form to you explaining the form needed to be sent to the court, not them.

 

I would write to the court just stating you acknowdegd the debt and unkowningly sent the completed N1 form with your offer to repay the outsatnding balance to the claimant Safeloan Limited, the claimant accepted your proposal of £5 per month and the first payment was made November.

 

In the meantime continue to pay Safeloan the £5 per month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice guys. The form definitely said to send it back to the creditor and says in the the court (Northhampton) advice notes not to send a copy to the courts. The claimant's address and the address for the documents are the same. Anyway, spoke to the CCCS today (setting up a DMP) and I'm going to write directly to the courts asking for re-determination & time to pay it in installments. If not then I'll have to pay a fee and take it further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

donna

looks like you admitted the claim with a request for time to pay re instalments, and they accepted? if so, you are correct 'The defendant may admit the claim by returning to the claimant an admission in the relevant practice form'. 'If the defendant wishes to make an admission in respect of the whole of a claim for a specified amount of money, the admission form or other written notice of the admission should be completed and returned to the claimant within 14 days of service of the particulars of claim'. Civil Procedure Rules 14.4, 14.9, Practice Direction 14; paras 3.1, 4.2 for eg would apply. they then should've made a request for judgement accordingly, notifying the court of their acceptance of the instalments. looks like they may have made an error in their request for judgement.(or may not have done the request)? maybe give the court a call and explain that they have messed up? also, bear in mind that if you are, by any chance, able to pay the whole amount off within a month then you will avoid a registered CCJ.

imo.

Edited by Ford
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...