Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sorting girl friends life out


kommisar89
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4903 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

Help please. i have tried reading the forums and i have a limited grasp on whats going on but as they say, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

 

I am trying to sort my Gf's financial mess out. (she screwed over by ex husband)

 

I recently sent off CCA requests to Barclaycard and HSBC (no replies yet).

 

BC have responded stating they accept that as they are unable to provide a copy of the CCA they are unable to enforce the agreement. They quote Carey v HSBC as to why they believe that their rights continue and she should carry on paying. They reserve the right to report to credit reference companies without telling them its unenforceable and instructing 3rd parties to demand payment. They refer to McGuffick v RBS 2009 to prove that these steps dont count as enforcement!!

 

Worth noting that her statements show a 'payment break plan' that she has no idea about. She doesnt recall ever agreeing to this. £24.95pm!!!! Could this be mis -selling?

 

So now what? Any help would be more than welcome

 

Thanks in anticipation

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should have pointed out that BC included a copy of a 'reply card' alledgedly signed by my gf going back over 10 years ago. The copy forms part of a larger document but they have not copied the rest of it, just the bottom section.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kommisar,

 

As BC have admitted they don't have the Credit Agreement, they should be unable to have the debt enforced in court - ie get a CCJ for the a/c balance.

 

However, they will still seek payment and place adverse credit markers with the CRA's.

 

The only way this would be tested in court would be if BC or their DCA takes court action, which is rare. You would be unwise to seek a ruling of unenforceability as the Claimant or Applicant in court proceedings after the Carey case.

 

Have you checked for penalty charges on the a/c as these can be reclaimed in full with compound interest.

 

Re the Pay't Break Plan, £25 a month is a lot. Do you think this was added to the a/c without your GF's knowledge by BC. If so, write to them and ask for proof that your GF asked for, or agreed, to this. If they have no such proof, seek a full refund of this item.

 

Do you have all the old statements for the a/c going back at least 6 years. If not, get them using the SAR from the Bank Templates Library.

 

8)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

She has no knowledge of asking for this cover so I will request proof. Do they have a time limit to respond to this? I will request the full statements as I can only find 18 months or so. My gf has tried to keep paying on time so I dont know if there are any penalties. Would they be for missed payments etc? Thank you for taking the time to respond

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the delay but I have many threads which I work my way through in the evening.

 

BC Penalty Charges are made for late payment fees, missed payment fees and over-limit fees. They were £15 to £20 until they reduced to £12 in recent years. The penalties are reclaimable in full plus interest.

 

If you write asking for evidence that your GF consented to the Pay't Break Plan, there is no time limit by which they must respond. However, ask for their response within 14 days, then send a reminder. If they fail to respond adequately proving YGF consented to the PBP charges, you can take court action to recover the charges plus interest.

 

If you send them a SAR to get the a/c statements, they have 40 days to respond.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a nuisance and apologies if this appears stupid. The Barclaycard debt appears to be unenforceable and we intend to ignore any requests to pay up.

Does this mean we should not attempt to claim back the 'payment break insurance' premiums my gf has been paying on this card, which we believe to have been mis-sold? I.e the agreement is unenforceable on both sides

Thanks in anticipation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kommisar - your Q's are neither a nuisance nor stupid. :-)

 

How you deal with the moral issue about the BC a/c is your prerogative. Just be aware that BC could still take court action or sell the debt, particularly if they find the credit agreement.

 

You are fully entitled to claim back the Pay't Break Ins'ce and any penalty charges, plus interest on both. If you take court action to do this, you may get the pay't made to you direct. Or you could choose to have they refunds set against the a/c balance to reduce the debt.

 

If you claim interest in restitution compounded at the bank's contractual rate, BC will not normally repay this, forcing you to take court action if you want it.

 

If BC agree to refund any amounts voluntarily, they will set such refunds against the outstanding a/c balance.

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...